Watchtower Study - July 15

by hippikon 5 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • hippikon
    hippikon

    "IF GOD IS FOR US,WHO WILL BE AGAINST US?”

    “What, then, shall we say to these things? If God is for us who will be against us?” – Romans 8:31

    WHEN the Israelites headed for freedom after spending 215 years in Egypt, much of that time in slavery, “a vast mixed company also went up with them.” (Exodus 12:38) These non-Israelites had experienced ten awesome plagues that wrought havoc upon Egypt and made a laughingstock of its false gods. At the same time, they had observed—especially from the fourth plague onward—Jehovah’s ability to protect his people. (Exodus 8:23, 24) Although limited in their knowledge of Jehovah’s purposes, they were sure of one thing: The gods of Egypt had failed to protect the Egyptians, whereas Jehovah had proved himself strong in behalf of the Israelites.

    1.Who left Egypt with the Israelites, and what led them to do so?

    Forty years later, just before the Israelites entered the Promised land, Moses’ successor, Joshua, sent two men to spy out the land. There they met Rahab, an inhabit-ant of Jericho. From what she had heard about Jehovah’s powerful acts to protect the Israelites during the 40 years since their leaving Egypt, she knew that if she wanted God’s blessing, she must support his people. Because of her wise decision, she and her household were spared de-struction when the Israelites later captured the city. The miraculous way in which they were saved was in itself unmistakable evidence that God was with them. Thus, Rahab’s confidence in the God of the Israelites was not misplaced.—Joshua2:1, 9-13; 6:15-17, 25.

    2.Why did Rahab support the Israelite spies, and why was her confidence in their God not misplaced?

    Fifteen centuries later, Jesus Christ healed a blind beggar near the rebuilt city of Jericho. (Mark 10:46-52; Luke 18:35-43) This man begged Jesus to show him mer-cy, indicating that he recognized that Jesus had God’s backing. The Jewish religious lead-ers and their followers, on the other hand, generally refused to accept the miracles Jesus performed as proof that he was doing God’s work. Instead, they found fault with him. (Mark 2:15, 16; 3:1-6; Luke 7:31-35) Even when confronted with the fact that Jesus was resurrected after they had put him to death, they were unwilling to admit that this was of God’s doing. Rather, they took the lead in persecuting Jesus’ followers, trying to hinder their work of “declaring the good news of the Lord Jesus.” But some Jews, and later many non-Jews, took note of these events and eval-uated them correctly. To them it was obvious that God had rejected the self-righteous Jew-ish leaders and was backing the humble fol-lowers of Jesus Christ.—Acts 11:19-21.

    3.(a) What miracle did Jesus perform near the rebuilt city of Jer-icho, and how did the Jewish clergy react? (b) What did some Jews, and later many non-Jews, come to realize?

    Who Today Have God’s Backing?

    On the question of true religion, one clergyman said in a recent TV interview: “I would insist a religion is true if it makes a person a better person when he or she lives by it.” Granted, true religion does make people better. But does the fact that a religion pro-duces better people in itself prove that it has God’s backing? Is that the sole criterion for determining if a religion is true?

    4, 5. (a) How do some people feel about choosing a religion? (b) When identifying the true religion, what is the pivotal question?

    Everyone appreciates being able to make personal choices, including the choice of re-ligious affiliation. But having the freedom to choose does not guarantee that a person will make the right choice. Some people, for ex-ample, choose a religion on the basis of its size, wealth, ceremonial pageantry, or their family ties. None of these things are in any way decisive in determining whether a reli-gion is the true one or not. The pivotal ques-tion in this matter is: Which religion urges its followers to do God’s will and gives solid evi-dence of divine backing, so that its adherents can say with confidence, “God is for us”? 6Jesus laid down the rule for distinguish-ing true worship from false when he said: “Be on the watch for the false prophets that come to you in sheep’s covering, but inside they are ravenous wolves. By their fruits you will recog-nize them.” (Matthew 7:15, 16; Malachi 3:18) Let us review some of the “fruits,” or identi-fying marks, of true religion so that we in all honesty can determine who today has divine backing.

    6.What words of Jesus shed light on the matter of true and false religion?

    Identifying Marks of Those Having God’s Backing

    They base their teachings on the Bible. Je-sus said: “What I teach is not mine, but be-longs to him that sent me. If anyone desires to do His will, he will know concerning the teaching whether it is from God or I speak of my own originality.” And also: “He that is from God listens to the sayings of God.” (John 7:16, 17; 8:47) Logically, to enjoy God’s backing, one must teach only what God re-veals in his Word and reject teachings based on human wisdom or tradition.—Isaiah 29:13; Matthew 15:3-9; Colossians 2:8.

    7.What does it mean to teach only what is based on the Bible?

    They use and publicize God’s name, Jeho-vah. Isaiah foretold: “In that day you will cer-tainly say: ‘Give thanks to Jehovah, you peo-ple! Call upon his name. Make known among the peoples his dealings. Make men-tion that his name is put on high. Make mel-ody to Jehovah, for he has done surpassingly. This is made known in all the earth.’” (Isaiah 12:4, 5) Jesus taught his followers to pray: “Our Father in the heavens, let your name be sanctified.” (Matthew 6:9) Therefore, wheth-er Jew or non-Jew, Christians were to serve as “a people for [God’sj name.” (Acts 15:14) God is obviously pleased to back those who are proud to be “a people for his name.”

    8.Why is it important to use God’s name in wor-ship?

    They reflect God’s joyfulpersonaIitj~ As au-thor of “good news,” Jehovah is “the hap-py God.” (1 Timothy 1:11) So how could his worshipers be unhappy or persistently pes-simistic? Despite world distress and person-al problems, true Christians maintain a joy-ful spirit because they regularly feast on rich spiritual food. Isaiah contrasts them with those practicing false religion: “This is what the Sovereign Lord Jehovah has said: ‘Look! My own servants will eat, but you your-selves will go hungry. Look! My own servants will drink, but you yourselves will go thirsty. Look! My own servants will rejoice, but you yourselves will suffer shame. Look! My own servants will cry out joyfully because of the good condition of the heart, but you your-selves will make outcries because of the pain of heart and you will howl because of sheer breakdown of spirit.’ “—Isaiah 65:13, 14.

    9.(a) Why does joy characterize members of the true religion? (b) How does Isaiah contrast true reli-gion with false?

    They base their conduct and their de-cisions on Bible principles. “Trust in Jehovah with all your heart and do not lean upon your own understanding,” the writer of Prov-erbs advises us, “in all your ways take notice of him, and he himself will make your paths straight.” (Proverbs 3:5, 6) God backs those who look to him for direction rather than to the contradictory theories of humans who ignore godly wisdom. To the extent that a person is willing to pattern his life after God’s Word, he will avoid having to learn by trial and error.—Psalm 119:33; 1 Corinthians 1:19-21.

    10.How do those having the true religion avoid having to learn by trial and error?

    They are organized in the manner of the first-century Christian congregation. Jesus set out the principle: “Do not you be called Rab-bi, for one is your teacher, whereas all you are brothers. Moreover, do not call anyone your father on earth, for one is your Father, the heavenly One. Neither be called ‘leaders,’ for your Leader is one, the Christ. But the great-est one among you must be your minister.” (Matthew 23:8-11) A congregation of broth-ers precludes having a proud clergy class that honors itself with high-sounding titles and elevates itself above a laity. (Job 32:21, 22) Those shepherding the flock of God are told to do so “not under compulsion, but willing-ly; neither for love of dishonest gain, but ea-gerly; neither as lording it over those who are God’s inheritance, but becoming examples to the flock.” (1 Peter 5:2, 3) Genuine Chris- tian shepherds refrain from trying to make themselves masters over the faith of others. As fellow workers in God’s service, they sim-ply strive to set a fine example.—2 Corinthi-ans 1:24.

    11.(a) Why can members of the true religion not be divided into a clergy and a laity class? (b) What example are those taking the lead among God’s people to set for the flock?

    They are submissive to human govern-ments and yet remain neutral. He who fails to be “in subjection to the superior authori-ties” cannot expect to have God’s backing. Why? Because “the existing authorities stand placed in their relative positions by God. Therefore he who opposes the authority has taken a stand against the arrangement of God.” (Romans 13:1, 2) However, Jesus rec-ognized the possibility of a conflict of interests when he said: “Pay back Caesar’s things to Caesar, but God’s things to God.” (Mark 12:17) Those desiring to have God’s backing must “keep on. . . seeking first the kingdom Lof God] and his righteousness,” while at the same time obeying the laws of the land that are compatible with their higher responsibil-ities to God. (Matthew 6:33; Acts 5:29) Jesus stressed neutrality when he said of his disci-ples: “They are no part of the world, just as I am no part of the world.” He later added: “My kingdom is no part of this world.” —John17:16; 18:36.

    12.What balanced position regarding human gov-ernments does God require of those desiring to have his backing?

    They are impartial in working “what is good toward all.” (Galatians 6:10) Christian love knows no partiality, accepting all peo-ple regardless of their skin color, economic or educational status, nationality, or language. The working of what is good toward all and especially toward those related to them in the faith helps to identify those having God’s backing. Jesus said: “By this all will know that you are my disciples, if you have love among yourselves.”—John 13:35; Acts 10:34, 35.

    13.What part does love play in identifying God’s people?

    They are willing to suffer persecution for doing God’s will. Jesus forewarned his follow-ers: “If they have persecuted me, they will persecute you also; if they have observed my word, they will observe yours also.” (John 15:20; Matthew 5:11, 12; 2 Timothy 3:12) Those having God’s backing have always been un-popular, as was Noah, who condemned the world through his faith. (Hebrews 11:7) To-day, those desiring God’s backing dare not water down God’s word or compromise god-ly principles so as to avoid persecution. As long as they faithfully serve God, they know that people will be “puzzled and go on speak-ing abusively” of them.—1 Peter 2:12; 3:16; 4:4.

    14.Do people having God’s approval necessarily find universal acceptance? Explain.

    Time to Evaluate the Facts

    Ask yourself, ‘What religious group is noted for sticking closely to God’s Word, even when its teachings differ from the beliefs of most people? Who stress the importance of God’s personal name, even using it to identi-fy themselves? Who optimistically point to God’s Kingdom as the only solution to all hu-man problems? Who uphold Bible standards of conduct, at the risk of being considered old-fashioned? What group is noted for hav-ing no paid clergy, all of its members be-ing preachers? Who are praised for being law-abiding citizens, even though they refrain from taking part in politics? Who lovingly spend time and money in helping others to learn about God and his purposes? And de-spite all of these positive things, who are still looked down on, ridiculed, and persecuted?’

    Millions of people throughout the world have evaluated the facts and have become convinced thatJehovah’s Witnesses alone are practicing the true religion. They have reached this conclusion on the basis of what Jehovah’s Witnesses teach and how they con-duct themselves, as well as on the basis of the benefits their religion has brought. (Isaiah 48:17) Millions are, in effect, saying, as foretold at Zechariah 8:23: “We will go with you people, for we have heard that God is with you people.”

    15, 16. (a) What questions will help us identi-fy the religious group that enjoys God’s back-ing? (b) What conclusion have millions of people reached, and why?

    Is it presumptuous of Jehovah’s Witness-es to point out that they alone have God’s backing? Actually, no more so than when the Israelites in Egypt claimed to have God’s backing in spite of the Egyptians’ belief, or when first-century Christians claimed to have God’s backing to the exclusion of Jewish reli-gionists. The facts speak for themselves. In 235 lands Jehovah’s Witnesses are doing the work Jesus foretold that his true followers would be doing in the time of the end: “This good news of the kingdom will be preached in all the inhabited earth for a witness to all the nations; and then the end will come.”—Matthew 24:14.

    17.Why is it not presumptuous of Jehovah’s Wit-nesses to point out that they have the true religion?

    Jehovah’s Witnesses will continue to car-ry out this commission, never allowing perse-cution or opposition to impede their activity. Jehovah’s work must and will be done. Every attempt others have made during the past century to hinder the Witnesses from accom-plishing God’s work has ended in ultimate failure, for Jehovah promised: “Any weapon whatever that will be formed against you will have no success, and any tongue at all that will rise up against you in the judgment you will condemn. This is the hereditary posses-sion of the servants of Jehovah, and their righteousness is from me.”—Isaiah 54:17. That Jehovah’s Witnesses are stronger and more active now than ever before—and this in the face of worldwide opposition—is proof that Jehovah finds pleasure in what they are doing. King David said: “By this I do know that you have found delight in me, be-cause my enemy does not shout in triumph over me.” (Psalm 41:11; 56:9, 11) Never will God’s enemies be able to shout in triumph over Jehovah’s people, for their Leader, Jesus Christ, is moving ahead to final victory!

    18, 19. (a) Why is there no reason for Jehovah’s Witnesses to desist from doing their preaching work, even though they are opposed? (b) How does Psalm 41:11 support the fact that the Witnesses have God’s backing7

    Can You Answer?

    •What are some ancient examples of people having God’s backing?

    •What are some identifying marks of the true religion?

    •Why are you personally convinced that Jehovah’s Witnesses have God’s backing?.

  • Gozz
    Gozz

    It is no more a wonder why the WTB&TS seeks to justify it's position. The situation is not much different from that of children who, finding themselves in a dark alley, sing loudly. The motivation of such is to instill some measure of confidence against the fear within. Every now and then, a feel-good article emerges on the pages of the Watchtower. The Society would engage blow it's feeble trumpet, producing discordant tones, and hurting itself.

    ****"They use and publicize God’s name, Jeho-vah".
    To this day, the WTB&TS has not been able to provide any proof that Jesus ever pronounced the name of his Father. In all of Jesus' recorded verbal communication in the bible, he always referred to God as "Father" "My Father" and such titles. How can Jesus Christ be wrong? What about Yahweh? Nobody knows what the actual pronounciation of God's name was.

    ********"How do those having the true religion avoid having to learn by trial and error?"
    A carefully worded question. Yet, the WTB&TS have learnt by trial and error. The changes (not adjustments) in the blood doctrine along with its inconsistencies, the reversal of the policy on transplantations, pyramidiology, Beth Sarim, Beth Shan, the war against medicine, the several end-of-the-world dates (1914, 1925,1975, and 1999/2000) have thrown up the Society (not God) as having miscalculated, and more surprising, they have failed to own-up to their own mistakes.

    ****"They are organized in the manner of the first-century Christian congregation."
    Frequently, material in WTB&TS publications would villify Christendom for the Clergy/Laity situation. This has been the flagship reasoning in the campaign agaist Christendom in general and Catholicism in particular. The Society continues to deny the existence of a similar practice in the JW fold. But what about the District Overseer (DO), Circuit Overseer (CO) Branch Committee, etc etc designations? Are individual JWs expected to give these a measure of 'respect' beyond the normal? The answer is a resounding YES. It's a case of the kettle saying the pot is black. There should be a shedding of that unfitting garb of superiority.

    "Is it presumptuous of Jehovah’s Witness-es to point out that they alone have God’s backing?"
    ****Of course, it may not necessarily be presumptuous for Jehovah's Witnesses to claim they have God's backing. They have the right to. But to do that and claim in addition that others do not have God's backing is going beyond the realm of reason. It is definitely presumptuous for any religion to claim that it alone have God's backing.

    In these and similar statements, the writer or writers of this article express their own opinion. The opinions are, amongst other things, designed on the selfish aim of making rank and file Jehovah's Witnesses, humble and teachable people, many of whom know not "their left from their right" believe they are good and others are bad. They definitely would not be presuming to be speaking the mind of God. And they are not.

  • MacHislopp
    MacHislopp

    Hello Hippikon,

    thanks again for your effort,

    and to Gozz: logical and TRUE comments.

    Greetings, J.C.MacHislopp

  • gsark
    gsark

    as always, thanks a million hippi.

    point #1: It amazes me the the GB assumes in fact and in its publications that a 'faithful and discreet slave' would be provided in the last days, and that appointment would be irrevocable and indefinite no matter what that 'slave' did from that day forward. I wonder what scriptures they base this on. Adam had God's approval untill he boo-bood, then approval was removed. How many times did the Israelites have God's approval until they screwed up enough to have it removed? How about uncountable (by me anyway) Israelite Kings, and priests. I don't see why God couldn't take approval away from the Bible students, say when Rutherford took over, and given his approval to someone else. Don't ask me who, I honestly wouldn't know. And if that wasn't enough, some faithful and discreet slave it is who decides with 'new light' to forbid lifesaving medical blood transfusions to innocent children, in direct conflict with Jeremiah 7:31: "to burn their sons and their daughters in the fire, a thing that I had not commanded and that had not come up into my heart."

    point #2 Jesus specifically said that his followers would be persecuted for his name. The GB says that as evidence of divine backing, they were persecuted for refusing ALTERNATIVE military service, for refusing lifesaving medical treatment for their children, for refusing to pay a 25 cent tax in Malawi, for shunning, for going to people's doors and asking for money, and the list goes on and on. And ,I ask, what does this have to do with JESUS! Nothing, I say. But you be the judge.

    point #3: Jesus said we would know his followers by their love for one another. I fail to see how building an empire on the backs of mostly their women, then denying them equal share in the decision-making process; denying their children life saving medical treatment, shunning family members, protecting child abusers in their midst and then punishing the abused children for telling about it; disfellowshipping their women for being raped and not screaming up untill 1993, and on and on can be described as 'love for one another.'
    I'll have to ask the next JW that comes to my door what hatred is if they call that 'love.'

    point #4 "Be patient and wait on Jehovah and don't run ahead of the organization." If the GB didn't open its collective mouth with all this 'new light' there'd be nothing to 'run ahead of.' Aaaargh!

    Thanks for listening,

    By this all will know that you are my disciples, if you have love among yourselves.

  • somebody
    somebody

    hippikon,

    wow! This is great! I thank you along with the others who have. I hope you can keep posting the articles. I've read this one and next weeks. I'm printing them out to look over and read again. Thanks again!

    Gozz and gsark, those were great points you both made. I pray hope all the lurkers out here think about those points.

    peace,
    somebody

  • Lindy
    Lindy

    "Is it presumptuous of Jehovah’s Witness-es to point out that they alone have God’s backing? Actually, no more so than when the Israelites in Egypt claimed to have God’s backing in spite of the Egyptians’ belief, or when first-century Christians claimed to have God’s backing to the exclusion of Jewish reli-gionists. The facts speak for themselves"

    Now, this is interesting. If you look back, yes, each of these groups did have God's backing, but each group either left God, or God left them. So, if the Bible is an example for us today, then does that mean, given all the examples thus far that the ones claiming to be God's people today, would also fail? I think that the answer would be "Yes". Their track record speaks for itself. They just needed enough time for the "untruths" to show up without question.
    Lindy

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit