INFIDELITY

by philo 3 Replies latest jw friends

  • philo
    philo

    ‘It is necessary to the happiness of man that he be mentally faithful to himself. Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving, it consists in professing to believe what one does not believe.’ (Tom Paine)

    It is impossible to say how many Jehovah’s Witnesses profess to believe what they do not believe. All religions must have an element of their memberships which only ‘profess’ belief. But questions that can be looked at are: to what extent is this dissonant mentality produced by Watchtower doctrines, and how far is this encouraged by Watchtower congregational policies?

    Armageddon example:

    At the start of this 21st Century, here is little question that the dark clouds of Armageddon are further off than they have ever been in the minds of JWs. Yet they still need to transmit a sense of urgency to people about Armageddon to get them into the 'truth'. They feel good about saving people, they enjoy their status of mentor, and they gain respect from the congregation when they bring new ones along at meetings. Knowing that 'if the trumpet sounds an indistinct call nobody will get ready for battle' they, expediently, often exaggerate their own sense of the imminence of Armageddon. They are taught that their personal beliefs are not important, or are at least subordinate, so this expediency does not bother them greatly because they are leading people to the bigger 'truth' as they see it. In this way, truth is displaced by Truth As Paine would have it, this is infidelity, which makes people unhappy.

    Would anyone like to give other examples?

    philo

    "It is an absurdity to believe that the Deity has human passions, and one of the lowest of human passions, a restless appetite for applause." [David Hume]

  • philo
    philo

    Assembly prophecies example:

    The Revelation Climax! book is filled with intricate, secondary fulfilments of scripture. Few JWs I knew had taken these to heart, and a few were even so bold as to express real doubt about them privately; at times in Climax!the Cedar Point, Ohio convention in 1919 (or whenever) comes across as the universal centre, temporal and spatial. Here, thinking dubs will shrug, and call it a nice bit of prophetic guesswork, but no more.

    And yet, in the intimacy of the group's book study, when people's comments can bear little relation to the questions asked, or the material at hand, and when a grateful conductor will permit much latitude, they will still 'answer up' giving the appearance that they agree with even the most outlandish prophetic guesses.

    So what's in it for them? They are saying things they don't believe to sustain the meeting and prevent awkward silences. Sometimes, the only part of the week's material requiring any intellectual effort is that very answer - so they speak up to relieve the tedium. Personally, I used to home-in on the craziest material just for fun.

    Philo

  • MacHislopp
    MacHislopp

    Hello Philo,

    a good one, but wait for the latest

    " light that shines forth, brighter and brighter

    for ALL the loyal ones.."

    Greetings, J.C.MacHislopp

  • philo
    philo

    Mac,

    You mean the way dubs SAY "all this wonderful spiritual food" when they are thinking "here we go again". Or, "the progressive organisation" when they really feel, "why couldn't they get it right the first time" Perhaps?

    philo

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit