Wow! "Scholar" has finally come over to the dark side.
I've consistently shown that the Watchtower Society often misrepresents source references, and "scholar" now agrees. He now states that "the Society misleads readers by its improper use of souces" and "the Society can only be accused of misrepresentation". With respect to its distortion of the views of scholar Edwin Thiele, he nows states that "the Society misrepresented Thiele's notaion". And now, he even admits that "the canon of Ptolemy may be used as a historical guide with the fullest confidence".
Tell me, "scholar", just what caused this huge change in your view of the Watchtower Society?
AlanF