B.C. cancer patient still seeking care in U.S.

by ezekiel3 8 Replies latest watchtower medical

  • ezekiel3
    ezekiel3
    Source: http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/1115906797052_19/?hub=Canada
    B.C. cancer patient still seeking care in U.S.

    CTV.ca News Staff

    The 14-year-old cancer patient from British Columbia who's refusing a blood transfusion is still hoping to go to the U.S. this week to begin an alternative treatment.

    The teen -- who can't be named because of a publication ban -- is a Jehovah's Witness and says the Bible forbids her from receiving blood products.

    She has been undergoing chemotherapy after having a cancerous tumour removed from her leg last fall. The chemo has stripped her blood of red blood cells, prompting her doctors to recommend a transfusion.

    While the girl has tried to refuse a transfusion, under B.C. law, only those 19 and older can refuse medical treatment.

    Her family has arranged for her to be treated at Schneider Children's Hospital in New York which has a "bloodless" cancer treatment program. But earlier this week, after the girl and her family fled to Ontario, a judge there refused to hear her arguments and ordered her home to B.C. to start treatment immediately.

    The judge said entertaining other treatment options at this late stage represented a delay and threatened her life.

    Dr. Michael LaCorte, the director of the bloodless medicine program at Schneider Hospital, told Canada AM Thursday that his team is hopeful that a hearing can be held quickly so that the girl can be flown to his hospital today.

    "We're pretty optimistic we can start treatment as early as tomorrow," he said.

    LaCorte believes the teen is a good candidate forýthe alternativeýprogram at his hospital's oncology department.

    The treatment at Schneider's is based on a philosophy of conserving a patient's blood by limiting blood draws. It would also see her given medication to stimulate her bone marrow to keep her blood levels as high as possible.

    "The major thing in a case like this is allowing her blood counts to go below levels that traditional medicine may dictate," he says. "In our program, we watch the child very, very carefully. We allow the hemoglobin to drop below traditional levels. We believe it's safe and there are many centres like this around the country that believe it's safe.

    "We only transfuse if there's indication that the individual really, really requires blood."

    LaCorte says that the patient and her family realize that there is still a possibility that a transfusion may at some point be the only way to keep her alive but she has still signed on to the treatment.

    "Since they're aware of the fact that we've done this before, and that we use all the techniques that we possibly can, they understand that their child may, at an extreme instance, need blood. And they have accepted that, as has the child.

    "That's really the difference is the trust between the team and the family, that we will do everything in our power, and we have had experience, and we will consult with anybody today they ask us to for any methods that could protect her from getting a transfusion."

    LaCorte says his hospital and the patient's family have worked out an agreement so that the costs of the treatment will be shared by the hospital, by various charities and by the family.

    He adds that because she's had such excellent care from her hospital in British Columbia and is nearing the end of her treatment, he believes the girl has a good prognosis.

  • SixofNine
    SixofNine

    Fascinating! The girl has already agreed to a blood transfusion, "they understand that their child may, at an extreme instance, need blood. And they have accepted that, as has the child".

    Now they really are just haggling over at what point a human in this situation will most likely die w/out a transfusion, and how much level of risk (in time and various treatment options) is acceptable to take before allowing a doctor to decide that that point has arrived.

  • EvilForce
    EvilForce

    I bet they are trying to get into the US so they can then avoid the power of the Canadian courts and misleading the Candian courts about what they would do once in the US. But once they are in the US then the Candian justice system would be stymied.

  • kwintestal
    kwintestal

    Very disappointing.

    Kwin

  • johnny cip
    johnny cip

    WHAT CHARITIES ARE GOING TO PAY FOR HER TREATMENT? THE RED CROSS? SURELY NOT THE WTBTS THAT IS REGESTERIED AS A CHARITY. AND U.S. CITIZENS COULD HELP PAY ? FROM THE TAX $$$$$$$$$$$$ THESE HOSPITALS GET FROM THE U.S. GOV'T !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHAT A LINE OF $&IT THE WT COMES UP WITH . I HATE TO SAY THIS . BUT I HOPE . ALL THE JW'S THAT ARE TRYING TO KILL THIS GIRL DIE ON THE FLIGHT TO N.Y.C AND THE GIRL LIVES. TO BE 99.

  • talesin
    talesin

    No, johnny cip. The province (insurer) would most likely pay. If it is the only life-saving treatment available, they will pay for the person to get it in another province (eg, Sick Children's in TO) or the US (eg, Mayo clinic). It usually only happens in cases of rare diseases. This could be part of the reason why the judge is ordering her to stay in BC -- there is no need to send her to NYC for treatment, and it is a waste of the taxpayer's money.

    Six, I had exactly the same thoughts about that as you. Perhaps they are trying to 'appear' more reasonable on the blood stance, and oh-so-slowly allowing some 'new light' to 'shine'. *puke* This is one issue that gets Canadians really riled, what with our 'holy' socialized medicine.

    t

  • Marvin Shilmer
    Marvin Shilmer

    Earlier, from the JW lawyer:

    "She does not want a blood transfusion, but she wants to live," said Brady. "She wants the best medical treatment, but she wants treatment by those who have given this type of treatment without blood transfusions. It's a matter of choice."

    Then, from the teen JW patient:

    "I don't want it," she said, of the blood transfusion doctors will administer if they believe it's warranted. "It's based on God's word. He told us to abstain from blood and we need to obey his commandments."

    "He created us and that's the least I can do for Him," she said of her desire to follow the biblical directive refusing blood.

    Now, from the US doctor:

    LaCorte says that the patient and her family realize that there is still a possibility that a transfusion may at some point be the only way to keep her alive but she has still signed on to the treatment.

    So much refusing treatment that could include blood transfusion! So much for supposedly obeying God?s commandments! So much for doing the least one can for Jehovah!

    If the above information is not sufficient for officials to see how this little girl has been manipulated by WTS legal eagles, then they are blind!

    Marvin Shilmer

  • rebel8
    rebel8

    I wonder how much her health has declined and the risk of death has increased just because of all these delays.

  • BluesBrother
    BluesBrother

    Very interesting.. If the good Dr La Corte is right about the agreement, then she and her family has agreed to a blood transfusion if it is necessary to sustain her life. A reasonable stance that many of us would take, but totally against the teachings of The Watchtower.

    Q] Will the Borg continue to support her?

    Will they take action against the family if they stand in court and repeat that agreement?

    Have they caved in. or were they perhaps going to that clinic in the belief that their non blood stand would be respected?? Watch this space.....

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit