Considering the manner of the "company men" in the org., would things be worse without it - generally that is, not individually. Without the fear and rules generated by literal understandings of the spiritual writings, would these same folk be simply out of control in the wider society ? Fundamentalism may well control and restrain people who would otherwise be running amock.
Could it generally limit the amount of abusive behaviour that the wider population of meek peple are generally subjected to; this imagined fear of punishment that is part and parcel of literal style fundamentalism ? Is there an argument there ?