Dan,
I question your reasonings on several points. I dont believe you can take the Bible in whole. You will have to either add to it in some form or wind up emblelishing scripture to shore up your doctrine.
This has been my point all along. You clearly stated in one of your first posts'... "Baptism is a must"
I refute that claim with the thief on the cross. He gets a promise before he dies. Hence no baptism.
Your only defense is this notion of a "vicarious action" that implys that a human can seal ones fate by his or her actions in behalf of another while here on earth. Which totally erodes Jesus words where he states emphatically "I am the way the truth the life"
Mt. 28:19 Jesus tells the apostles to baptize in the name of the Father and of the Son and the Holy spirit, and no where does Jesus indicate that if this isnt done, do it by proxy after they die.
Dan, Ive asked you serval times to fortify this teaching of your church and other examples of vicarious actions you claim that are in the Bible, this Bible word of God you claim to enjoy reading. If you love to read about the Jewish traditions and early Christian "ways" why cant you produce these other vicarious actions you speak of?
Your the one who threw out the challenge that "I will be seriously outmatched" by your Bible wit.
If God wanted us to "baptize the dead" he would convey this through his word.
If God wanted us in the flesh to "ordain the dead" he would have taught us how.
E.