A couple of questions come to my mind.
Why are they so loath to put any GB members on the stand?
And what is in those documents (tendered in the hearing yesterday by Stewart) that WT lawyers don't want made public?
http://www.jw-archive.org/post/125844213823/geoffrey-jackson-declines-to-appear-before#at_pco=cfd-1.0&at_ab=per-15&at_pos=0&at_tot=14&at_si=55c27690475c6bb3
A couple of questions come to my mind.
Why are they so loath to put any GB members on the stand?
And what is in those documents (tendered in the hearing yesterday by Stewart) that WT lawyers don't want made public?
if you have heard g. jackson speak you can tell that he is smooth.
he is a good speaker with a commanding voice.
i think the gb knew this was going to happen and prepped him to testify.
It seemed obvious to me that all the elders that appeared were all coached.
They all tried to avoid the same questions about The GB, the role of the Aus branch, they all had the same spiel re always encourging victims to report to authorities, same memory gaps, same prevarication, circular arguements. Oh I have no doubt they were coached and if Jackson does appear he will be as well.
i actually started clapping at that point, as his honour explained to the wt type creep sycophantic slithery lawyer that........" i understand that we all have issues to face in life and .....that is a part of life...........however it has become obvious that this man ....is in such a position to assist with this investigation.....".
it boils down to the fact that stewart outright accused the latest witness of misleading the royal commission and this lead to some document searches which led his honour to conclude that they had been protecting mr jackson.
this was a warm and fluffy moment folks.................brilliant stuff!!!!!
wednesday 5 , day 7 live hearing.
case study 29, july 2015, sydney.
wednesday 5 , day 7 live hearing.
case study 29, july 2015, sydney.
Their only consistency is being inconsistent and evasive.
They do not want to admit they recieve instuctions from mother.
wednesday 5 , day 7 live hearing.
case study 29, july 2015, sydney.
I wish the Commission employed wrestlers to get to the truth.
wednesday 5 , day 7 live hearing.
case study 29, july 2015, sydney.
Toole says of victims..."They are not stopped in anyway , shape or form to do what is in their best interests"
Yeah right, except when it comes to blood transfusions.
wednesday 5 , day 7 live hearing.
case study 29, july 2015, sydney.
God, what bethel crypt did this vampire crawl out of?
Odious man!
wednesday 5 , day 7 live hearing.
case study 29, july 2015, sydney.
http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/aug/04/jehovahs-witness-church-says-it-will-comply-with-mandatory-reporting-of-child-abuse.
august 4, 2015. australian associated press .
the jehovahs witness church says it will comply with mandatory reporting obligations when they learn about sexual abuse crimes against children in their congregation.. a royal commission into institutional responses to child sexual abuse has heard that the theocratic church records more than one child abuse allegation every month yet in 60 years has never reported them to police.. in the second week of a hearing into the churchs handling of abuse incidents, the head of the communitys service desk, rodney spinks, acknowledged they dealt with matters internally and did not encourage reporting to police.. the service desk under the auspices of the churchs legal entity, the watchtower bible and tract society australia, is the first point of contact for elders looking for advice on how to deal with child abuse reports.. spinks said the first issue addressed is the safety of the child, and elders are referred to watchtower publications on the matter.. they are also given generic advice based on a handbook that says they should never suggest not reporting the allegation to police.. spinks acknowledged they had not had a practice, against the wishes of the victim or otherwise, to directly report to police.. the commission chair, peter mcclellan, pointed out there were mandatory reporting obligations when a crime had been committed.. spinks said he had been made aware of this in these hearings and the church would accept and comply with mandatory reporting, regardless of our strongly held religious belief that individuals should have the right to decide what is done with that information.. he said when there were mandatory reporting requirements with some sort of uniformity across the country we will happily and willingly comply.. mcclellan pointed out that uniform laws were not yet in place and they would differ from state to state but they would impose a criminal sanction on a person who knows [about an abuse crime] and does not report.. spinks said he understood that.. mcclellan said the church needed to have a very good look maybe with the help of the churchs lawyers at what the law provides.. the commissioner also pointed out that what the jehovahs witnesses were doing was different to what other churches might be doing because you might be taking allegations and resolving, as you see it, the truth of the allegation by reason of your process.. the commission has heard that the jehovahs witness process is based on a biblical rule that the wrongdoing is only proven when there are two witnesses, and expect the abuse victim to confront the abuser..
The thing is Rodney Spinks is not in a postion to speak for the GB or Aus Branch for that matter.
Any changes to WT practice and procedure or ammendments to the flockbook will come via HQ not Spinks.