Whether we should address God using terms such as it, He, She or not matters not.
Sorry to disagree with you Venus but it's the heart of the matter. As soon as you give any attribute to God, beyond being a non-interventionist creator who set reality in motion and then took no further part, then you enter the realm of extraordinary claims, for which there is no evidence,
You state that God is a he and that he "silently enjoys" providing humans with things. What is your proof that this is the case?
What if God is a she and she hates humanity because they insist on committing acts of destruction and not acts of creation?
What if God is a capricious child who created the universe by accident and then threw it away?
The fact is there is equal evidence to prove these propositions, including yours, i.e.: none.
The fact is that there are an infinite number of possibilities once you propose a creator God so the only logical position is to assume they are all false until there is any evidence to narrow the field.