cofty 4 minutes ago
I am still waiting to to to explain how the babies were a threat to human salvation. Could your god not protect the bloodline without murdering innocent babies wholesale?
I already answered:
If after 400 years they were still enemies, they'd be a high chance that the babies of the time would still grow up and continue to be enemies.
I never once said purity. I said it was about protecting the bloodline. By stopping threats to it which could have damaged it beyond repaid. Therefore your point about Ruth is irrelevant.cofty
You were very explicit earlier that it had to do with protecting the purity of the bloodline.
I don't believe there are contradictions in the Bible, but there are things that are hard to understand. Also around creation etc I do believe a lot of what is detailed in the Bible is symbolism, so who knows how much of it actually happened. E.g. I am a firm believer in evolution.