blondie: OC: Still haven't read the links have you?
haha - a rhetorical question because we already know the answer
http://theconversation.com/blood-transfusion-refusals-why-new-guidelines-arent-up-to-scratch-70237.
blood transfusion refusals – why new guidelines aren’t up to scratch .
february 22, 2017. blood transfusions are a common and often lifesaving procedure.
blondie: OC: Still haven't read the links have you?
haha - a rhetorical question because we already know the answer
http://theconversation.com/blood-transfusion-refusals-why-new-guidelines-arent-up-to-scratch-70237.
blood transfusion refusals – why new guidelines aren’t up to scratch .
february 22, 2017. blood transfusions are a common and often lifesaving procedure.
As your three posts indicate such an interest in this matter, I suggest you contact the article's author directly as ask him
His contact details are here: https://theconversation.com/profiles/clayton-oneill-322395
His email is: clayton.oneill @ ntu.ac.uk
His twitter is: https://twitter.com/ONeillClay
His phone number is listed here: https://www4.ntu.ac.uk/apps/staff_profiles/staff_directory/ddefc48e-36df-4f8a-b79d-ccd3071be943-0/26/profile.aspx?deptcode=NLS&deptTitle=Nottingham%20Law%20School&page=6
http://theconversation.com/blood-transfusion-refusals-why-new-guidelines-arent-up-to-scratch-70237.
blood transfusion refusals – why new guidelines aren’t up to scratch .
february 22, 2017. blood transfusions are a common and often lifesaving procedure.
OrphanCrow: This opening sentence misleads the reader right from the start by implying that the JWs are just one of others who also follow the same practice. There are no others.
Christian Scientists
http://www.fox13memphis.com/top-stories/mlgw-sued-for-religious-discrimination-harassment-retaliation/496547868.
news video included.
mlgw sued for religious discrimination, harassment & retaliation.
kpop: Everything WingCommander said!
hmmm
MLGW - Board of Light, Gas and Water Commissioners
Meeting Minutes - 6 February 2014
Mr. Jason Small addressed the Board noting he has been employed at MLGW for seventeen years and had not received any reprimands or discipline. He stated in the last four years he has undergone three wrist surgeries due to an injury on the job. After the last surgery, he was given a letter stating that he would not be able to work in his position due to a permanent restriction of heavy lifting. He stated he took the letter to the MLGW employee health nurse and was told he must leave immediately and would be contacted by Human Resources. He stated after three weeks he had not received a call from the HR Department, so he contacted them. During the call he stated he was told he had twelve months to find a job within the company for which he was qualified. He contacted HR regarding an open position for an Inspector in Revenue Protection. He stated he was told it was not MLGW policy or procedure to place bargaining unit employees in those type positions. He was later placed in a position which he described as stressful and is addressing the Board to make them aware of his situation. He noted he is knowledgeable in many areas of MLGW's business and wants to continue working at MLGW.
http://www.mlgw.com/images/content/files/board_meeting/SignedApprovedMinutes002014.pdf
And actually it just looks like he's asking for a job with similiar work hours / shift patterns as his original job - as MLGW is a large company they should be able to find him suitable employment, but according to him they haven't.
And the OP story states that the Department of Justice has already reviewed the case and believes it has merit to proceed: “Small has the right to institute a civil action under the Civil Rights Act of 1964."
http://theconversation.com/blood-transfusion-refusals-why-new-guidelines-arent-up-to-scratch-70237.
blood transfusion refusals – why new guidelines aren’t up to scratch .
february 22, 2017. blood transfusions are a common and often lifesaving procedure.
greetings, guys:.
all of us -- men and women -- should keep our medical appointments.
i address this post to guys, however, given my own reluctance to go to the doctor.
It's a big problem, missed appointments - both with the local GP/Doctor and at the Hospital.
One problem I think is when you get appointments months and months in advance for a six-monthly or annual check-up.
I think one way that it is being dealt with is by sending reminder SMS's to the patient's cell phone - but what should the message actually say??
A zero cost way to reduce missed hospital appointments
Published 4 January 2016
Around 1 in 10 hospital outpatient appointments are missed every year in England. Missed appointments can lead to worse patient care and waste NHS resources. Many hospitals send patients a text message reminder before their appointment. These reminders are effective and cheap, but there is no evidence about what they should contain in order to minimise missed appointments.
A randomised controlled trial tested the content of appointment reminders. The best form of words, which told the patients the specific waste to the NHS of not attending, reduced missed appointments by 23% compared to the standard message.
This is an easy innovation for the NHS to apply. Cutting missed appointments at this rate across England’s hospitals could increase NHS productivity.
please note - this is in italian!.
an italian movie - hat tip to room 2015. worldly girl (2016)la ragazza del mondo (original title).
1h 41min, drama romance9 november 2016 (italy).
Looks like this film is being released in France in early April 2017 under the title L’affranchie
fyi - don't think this has been posted here before.
in november 2016 the royal college of surgeons of england issued the following 40 page booklet:.
https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/library-and-publications/college-publications/docs/caring-for-patients-who-refuse-blood/.
FYI - don't think this has been posted here before
In November 2016 The Royal College of Surgeons of England issued the following 40 page booklet:
Caring for patients who refuse blood - a guide to good practice
This document provides guidance on the surgical management of Jehovah’s Witnesses and other patients who withhold consent to blood transfusion. It takes into account and expands on the principles set out in Good Surgical Practice (RCS, 2014), Consent: Supported Decision-Making – A Guide to Good Practice (RCS, 2016) as well as guidance from the GMC and NICE, to enable surgeons and their teams to provide high-quality care to Jehovah’s Witness and other patients who refuse blood transfusion while respecting their right to make autonomous decisions about treatment.
It offers information on the current requirements for patient communication and supported decision-making and practical advice to support surgeons in complying with their legal, ethical and regulatory obligations.
Although this guide has been developed primarily for surgeons, most of its recommendations are applicable to other medical specialties.
Clayton O'Neill comments on these guidelines in the article below from February 2017 (Clayton O'Neill is a Lecturer at the UK's Nottingham Trent University. His research interests are in medical law and human rights, particularly the relationship between medical law and the manifestation of religious belief.)
https://theconversation.com/blood-transfusion-refusals-why-new-guidelines-arent-up-to-scratch-70237
Blood transfusion refusals – why new guidelines aren’t up to scratch
Blood transfusions are a common and often lifesaving procedure. However, some groups, such as Jehovah’s Witnesses, forbid blood transfusions on religious grounds. Recently, the Royal College of Surgeons issued new guidelines on what to do when a person rejects a transfusion based on religious belief. However, these guidelines need further clarification to make it easier for surgeons to act fully in line with developments in English law when it comes to children.
In recent years, there has been a move away from paternalistic medicine, where the doctor always knows best, and a move towards “shared-decision making” – a process that is enshrined in English law. This means that the patient is informed of all the risks and, together with the doctor, they make an informed decision.
The issue of transfusion refusals is becoming increasingly important because the population of Jehovah’s Witnesses is growing, as well as people who refuse blood transfusions for reasons unrelated to religion. And the guidelines make a good attempt to give direction to surgeons who have to grapple with potentially life-threatening situations involving the refusal of blood transfusions using a patient-focused approach.
READ MORE: https://theconversation.com/blood-transfusion-refusals-why-new-guidelines-arent-up-to-scratch-70237
Slightly off-topic, not sure if this has been posted here before, so thought I'd just tag it on the bottom here.... rather old and two versions of the same document
The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland have the following 32 page booklet:
Management of Anaesthesia for Jehovah's Witnesses
The first edition of this guidance was published in March 1999 and was received by the members of both the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland (the Association) and the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Britain (the official organisation for British Jehovah’s Witnesses) with some acclaim.
Since then there has been a continuing debate surrounding the ethical and practical consequences of consent for medicine as well as developments in the areas of ‘Oxygen Therapeutics’, blood transfusion medicine and alternative blood sparing technologies.
In his Report for 2003 entitled On the State of Public Health, the UK Department of Health’s Chief Medical Officer, Professor Liam Donaldson, stated that he believed too many unnecessary blood transfusions were being given in England. He added, “The gift of blood is too often squandered by unnecessary and inappropriate use”, and expressed concern at the fall in the donor pool (down by one fifth in 4 years). He further suggested that transfusion is unnecessary unless the haemoglobin falls below 7 g/dl, and proposed that only consultants, and not junior staff, should be allowed to order blood and blood products.
READ MORE - 2005 version: https://www.aagbi.org/sites/default/files/Jehovah's%20Witnesses_0.pdf
READ MORE - 1999 version: https://www.aagbi.org/sites/default/files/Jehovah's%20Witness%201999.pdf
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/feb/16/australian-catholic-church-has-paid-276m-to-abuse-victims-so-far-inquiry-shows.
royal commission into institutional responses to child sexual abuse releases data showing 4,445 have come forward.
australian associated press.
FYI the original information for the OP's Guardian web article is available to read in full here:
The monetary aspects are fully explained in both -
Transcripts: Ms Gail Furness opening words from Day 250 - 16 February 2017
and
Themes: Data Introduction
http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/documents/case-studies/cs50/20170216-cs50-introduction-4-data-%281%29
For those that prefer to watch and listen rather than read - then please watch the below video (from 30 seconds in, ie: right at the start)
.
kingdom hall south dakota live stream.....i found this video on youtube.com.
it reminds me of my old kingdom hall where hardly anyone is sitting in the front rows and doesn't seem like they have a large membership.most kingdom halls sit around 200 people at the most and seem to have a hard time filling the seats.. my old congregation had around 45 members when i left 4 years ago.we always seemed to have a hard time meeting the monthly expenses.some months,i was told that some elders would contribute extra money so the congregation would not be in the negative for the month.. how many members did your congregation have while you were still attending and did meet its expenses for the month?.
RULES & REGULATIONS: Here is your typical Kingdom Hall of Jehovah'w Witnesses attendance!
TBH, I hear what you're saying but remember....
the picture is from Thursday 29 December 2016 - which is the strange time between Xmas and New Year, not really a typical time?
also
the picture is from South Dakota which had blizzard conditions just a few days
beforehand - travelling on the roads in the evening may not have been
such a good idea, so probably not really a typical time?
UnshackleTheChains: It's funny how the front seats are empty in a lot of halls. It's the same at our hall. Empty seats middle front. Everyone preferring to sit towards back and sides.
haha too true
joe134cd: Some body is onto it. The site has been blocked.
You need to click through to watch the video on YouTube - playback on other websites has been disabled by the video owner (that's quite common nowsdays)