David_Jay wrote
Another example of people who are ready to argue but not ready to read your comments and realize that they just agreed with you.
Another example of people who use a straw-man argument when they read your comments and realize that they were wrong.
I was purely making the factual comment that a website could handle 1.2 billion visits - therefore if the Catholic Church or Youtube or whoever wanted a website to cater for 1.2 billion people it is possible - there was no comment regarding the need or requirement or anything else - purely that it is technically possible.
Therefore the reason why the Catholic Church does not have 'one' website is NOT because of an issue with the technology - it is for another reason - but do NOT blame the lack of technology as being the reason!
I had already written:
Could one website handle the traffic of 1.2 billion plus people?
I believe youtube gets 20.5 billion visits-per-month - videos are not exactly 'light-weight' traffic
So, yes, it is likely that one website could handle the traffic of 1.2 billion plus people.