It is indeed. Kirkby congregation. Im told Kirkby was the mother of a lot of congregations that would pop up in later years.
Unfortunately not the best Kirkby headline on the front page of the Guardian's website today
jw wedding early 1980s and where they are now.... .
It is indeed. Kirkby congregation. Im told Kirkby was the mother of a lot of congregations that would pop up in later years.
Unfortunately not the best Kirkby headline on the front page of the Guardian's website today
http://www.jah-jireh.org/.
they have care homes in england and wales: wigan, leyland, blackpool, methyr.and one in canada http://www.jah-jireh.on.ca/.
these are not funded or subsidized by watchtower.
konceptual99: when they are advertised then they cannot be discriminatory
It seems they can, though maybe not for all job-roles within the care home. By asking the 'JW question' they could say they're simply finding out what the most appropriate job-role for somebody would be in relation to the care home's 'religious ethos'
The following link is interesting - below is just a snippet...
The Equality Act 2010 does potentially allow for religious organisations to require workers to be a member of a particular faith if they are able to show that, having regard to the nature and the context of the work, such a requirement is a genuine (general) ‘occupational requirement’ for the role. In order to satisfy the legislation, the occupational requirement to be of a particular religion or belief is a ‘proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim’, taking into account the religious ethos of the organisation and the type of employment the worker is to undertake.
READ MORE: http://www.lesteraldridge.com/employees-faith-based-requirements/
http://www.jah-jireh.org/.
they have care homes in england and wales: wigan, leyland, blackpool, methyr.and one in canada http://www.jah-jireh.on.ca/.
these are not funded or subsidized by watchtower.
on the balance of probability--i would think the majority of elderly dubs in the UK are "poor"---just getting by on the state pension. so--when they go into care--its most likely the care home fees will be paid by the local authority ( the council ). so--in the case of these jah jireh homes--yes--a very profitable business
Err no - actually I think that it's the OPPOSITE...
The Guardian, 22 August 2017
There is now compelling evidence that self-funded residents are paying higher fees and effectively subsidising state-funded residents sharing the same home, and that without this much of the social care market would not be viable
just wanted to share with you some good news i'm really excited about.
i have been accepted for university to study psychology and counseling.
my goal is to become a counselor and, in time, to specialize on treating those who have left high control relationships/groups like we all did.. it'll take a few years before im qualified but studying in university has been a dream of mine since i was 12, which was systematically dashed to pieces by watchtower.. .
When does your course start?
What happens to your child support payments?
https://www.gov.uk/how-child-maintenance-is-worked-out/rates-used-by-the-child-support-agency
jw wedding early 1980s and where they are now.... .
FWIW - link to slightly larger (and better quality) picture:
https://img.jehovahs-witness.com/image/9076e719a8bfc9dae151e8610c8b7d5d
http://www.jah-jireh.org/.
they have care homes in england and wales: wigan, leyland, blackpool, methyr.and one in canada http://www.jah-jireh.on.ca/.
these are not funded or subsidized by watchtower.
smiddy: Isnt this discriminatory? only having JW`s and no other faiths? that other faiths are exluded? is that legal?Citizens Advice: Religious organisations and charities - when discrimination is allowed in the provision of goods or services
The law which says you mustn't be discriminated against is called the Equality Act 2010. Discrimination which is against the Act is unlawful. But there are some situations where discrimination is allowed. Sometimes religious organisations and charities are allowed to discriminate against you when they provide services.
konceptual99: What is questionable is the question on the employment application form about being a JW. It's illegal to discriminate on the basis of religion and strictly speaking, it's not even permissible to ask someone about their religion in an interview.
I think that would be the issue - but interestingly what about actually advertising job vacancies? - you could almost 'pre-select' people by the newspaper/outlet you decided to advertise in? An advert in a Catholic newspaper or a gay magazine is going to generally attract a certain applicant in the first place...
for *australian* exjws who have stories of domestic violence, use email in this story to share.
(link: http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-18/shattering-silence-surviving-domestic-violence-in-church/8788902) .
Hmm - see also the OP's other topic/thread here:
for *australian* exjws who have stories of domestic violence, use email in this story to share.
(link: http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-18/shattering-silence-surviving-domestic-violence-in-church/8788902) mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-1.
This appears to originate with Julia Baird's ABC 7.30 Report that was broadcast in July 2017
Here she is discussing the programme:
for *australian* exjws who have stories of domestic violence, use email in this story to share.
(link: http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-18/shattering-silence-surviving-domestic-violence-in-church/8788902) .
That link doesn't seem to work
Try this instead : http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-18/shattering-silence-surviving-domestic-violence-in-church/8788902
fyihouston woman convicted of murder in husband's brutal stabbing.
wednesday, august 23, 2017jurors discount her claim that intruder was responsiblemelgar maintained her innocence in the dec. 22, 2012 killing, which occurred the day before the couple's 32nd wedding anniversary.http://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/houston-woman-convicted-of-murder-in-husband-s-11954131.php.
sandra melgar guilty of killing husband, faking home invasion on houston couple's anniversary night.
UPDATE:
Woman gets 27 years in stabbing death of husband
Thursday, August 24, 2017
Sandra Melgar was sentenced Thursday to 27 years and a $10,000 fine for killing her husband.
An hour earlier, prosecutors said she manipulated her family, her church friends and even her lawyers, in closing arguments of the punishment phase of the 57-year-old's trial for murder.
"They drank the Kool-Aid," prosecutor Colleen Barnett told jurors. "The devil is in the details. When you put together all the little details, it all adds up to guilty."
The housewife was facing a punishment ranging from five years to life in prison after being convicted Wednesday of murder in the 2012 stabbing death of her husband.
http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/Jury-deliberates-fate-of-housewife-convicted-of-11955509.php