Daniel was the work of cowards in the 160s BCE.
Chapter one talks of food issues. Compare to 2 Macc 6
Chapter 2 is where the Aramaic starts and matches chapter 7, 8. however you list matches the WT list and is wrong.
There is NO HISTORIAN that will claim Daniel was talking about anything beyond 165BCE The 'Kingdoms divided' were the Seludicds and the Ptolomys.
Chapter 3 speaks of Idolary and should be compared to 2 Maccabees 7
Futher chapter 4 might indeed speak of a legend from ancient Babylon however it is greatly disorted and propaganda toward Antoichus.
chapter 5 has 4 major historical inaccuracies.
Chapter 6 is comcerning prayer and is related to the final chapter os 2 Macabees
Chapter 9 is messinic and for the point of this review lets just say there is no way the book of Jeremiah would be considered canon had Daniel lived then! (Back to Hebrew)
10,11,12 are a interesting history that is maybe 70% accurate up until chapter 11 vs 33 and 34. These verses are the KEY TO UNLOCKING THE BOOK! 33 tells us whoever wrote this were Rabbis. vs 34 referances the Macabees with a passing glance indicating the time of date. It also show the writers as cowards.
After that this 'history' falls apart and becomes a battle God ends. Daniel in chapter 12 it told to 'seal up the book for the time of the end'. Yeah ...lol... right... This book was amazingly 'found' in the second centery BCE LOL.... The end never came and the 'little help' rules for 100 years.
The writers of Danile likely fled to the Dead Sea region and started a cult ... welll that another story...