Posts by OneEyedJoe

36

Could "this generation" inspire a new "1975 debacle"?

by Island Man in

i think that it's possible that they're getting ready to issue a new end time date insinuation like they did with 1975. now i know what some of you are probably thinking: why would they be so stupid as to repeat such a mistake, knowing what happened in 1975?

well here're two reasons why i think they could do it:.

first, it's important to remember that they are deluded.

OneEyedJoe

no. 1975 had a 7 year lead time. David Splane's spiel introduced the typical generation of Joseph. He lived to be 110. Anybody born (not just alive) during those 110 years is part of that generation.

My understanding (though I confess I haven't watched Splane's video) from the WT article about the overlap was not that they had to have overlapping lives, but that the generation applied only to anointed ones that had their "heavenly calling" overlap with the lives of anointed ones that had their "heavenly calling" prior to 1914. That's why fred franz was a good example for Splane's explanation because he would've been 21 in 1914 and likely had started partaking by then. So given that any overlappers would have to be partaking before 1992 to catch Franz (and well before that if you want to catch any significant portion of the first group of the overlap) that puts the minimum age of the second group of the overlap at ~40 today. But in 1992 almost all the partakers were much, much older (the youngest I'd ever met that was partaking then would be in his 70's now) due to the (now defunct) 1935 "sealing" of the anointed. So given that, the math works out pretty well to predict an end date of ~2034. That also has the convenience of matching the 120 years of Noah, which they've mentioned a few times in the last year or so.

Obviously, it could easily be twisted (just as they did with the original generation teaching) to extend the overlap well into 2075, but that's not what they're saying now (even in the literature they've said that the second group are themselves getting up in age) and I think they're more likely to set a date than to revise the teaching to extend the date (until they absolutely have to)

36

Could "this generation" inspire a new "1975 debacle"?

by Island Man in

i think that it's possible that they're getting ready to issue a new end time date insinuation like they did with 1975. now i know what some of you are probably thinking: why would they be so stupid as to repeat such a mistake, knowing what happened in 1975?

well here're two reasons why i think they could do it:.

first, it's important to remember that they are deluded.

OneEyedJoe

I think they'd risk losing too much credibility, even amongst JW loyalists.

I think I'd argue that they're not too worried about that. Afterall they did recently redefine the word generation with no relevant scriptural citation (even taken out of context the one scripture they cite doesn't support this 1+1=1 nonsense) and not too many people have gotten upset about it. And most that found a bad taste in their mouth are still trapped because "where else would I go?"

Additionally, it's entirely possible that they've done too good a job erasing 1975 with their revisionist history. The leadership themselves might not realize how big a deal it was. And in 10 years the only people who remember 1975 will be in their 60s at least and at that point I suspect that their mortality and their being unwilling to accept that they've wasted 50 (or more) years on a cult when they should've known better will keep them in. No one else will remember 1975 as anything more than a year that was occasionally mentioned in hushed tones in their youth. If they set a date in 10 years (my personal favorite is 2034, so 10 years would be about the right timing for them to start pushing it) no one will be thinking "here we go again" they'll be thinking "finally!"

Not saying they're definitely going to do it - I can just totally see it happening and I don't think anyone would object to it until after it passed. Even then they'd only lose the ones that weren't helping them much anyway. The very reason date setting works so well is because it's something that everyone should see through right away. The problem is that they get excited before they think rationally and then by the time they stop to use their reason they're already invested and they use their power of reason not to think objectively but to rationalize what they already want to be. After that, no one wants to believe that they've been duped by what is obviously bullshit so they stick with it.

18

Suicide Prevention Counseling

by MrCellophane in

in the 1980's when i was an elder, i don't remember the society providing any guidance to elders on suicide prevention counseling.

i realize much has changed since then.

can any current/recent elders update me on what the current position of the local elders would be if approached by someone in the congregation contemplating suicide and seeking help?.

OneEyedJoe

Not (never was) an elder but my guess would be to read some generic scripture about how god is your refuge, then lay on the guilt by explaining that suicide would result in loss of a hope of resurrection and then send them on their way.

I think I remember someone posting that a video was played at a recent elders school and the scene included the elders doing something about as effective as the above.

35

If Someone Touches Woman’s Breast and Covers it up…

by John Aquila in

one of the elders schools i attended, we dealt with a person who touched a girls breast and covered it up and kept it secret until it was revealed through a source.

the instructor first laid the ground work for a guilt trip.

he read this scripture;.

OneEyedJoe

Sounds like the mob - if you don't report when you know someone's skimming, the kingpin will go after your family.

One of the contradictions that always annoyed me in this cult was the issue of "stumbling" someone else and being responsible (and possibly dying at armageddon) for it vs if you are stumbled and leave you still die at armageddon. It's not "life for life" it's two lives lost unnecessarily because god's killing you both. If I'm stumbled by someone who's sufficiently guilty of causing my stumbling that god's perfect justice demands he pay with his life, doesn't that mean that I ought to survive armageddon? Or if I stumble someone and they're going to die at armageddon doesn't that mean that they were guilty of leaving and I wasn't at fault? I'm glad my parents were better than Jehovah - if they followed his example they would've killed me and my brother the first time we got into a fight.

14

Today's JWs

by jws in

jw
friends

so i posted earlier in the year that one of my son's friends is a jw.

he can never do anything on wednesdays because it's a meeting night.

same for sunday early afternoons.

OneEyedJoe

Back when I was a JW, "suggestions" against something were like a written law.

It depends on the family and the congregation. If your parents are hard-liners then this is still the case. If they're more social JWs (and especially if the father is either not appointed, or not in the picture) then the kids are more likely to be allowed to do after-school activities. If a kid is doing this sort of thing and seeking any privileges or maybe just if they talk to the wrong person, they or their parents are likely to get a talking to from the elders discouraging it.

17

Four "Sisters" killed in a car crash , Texas

by BluesBrother in

jw
friends

if this has been posted before - sorry.... the comment that they were dubs comes in the 8th paragraph down.

http://www.wfaa.com/story/news/local/dallas-county/2015/09/06/four-women-die-dallas-crash/71808290/.

a tragedy , j w's or not ........

OneEyedJoe

The woman placing flowers at the scene is obviously not a JW. I guess no JW's could be bothered to do so!

Not sure why you'd say that. I know of a number of JW women that dress very similarly to that, especially in the spanish congregations (this story is local to me...) around here. Obviously not while they're at meetings or in service, but any other time, especially on 100* days like we've been having, they'll be in short shorts and a tank top

And it'll probably add fire to people like Trump saying Mexicans are killing people.

Nah...trump doesn't care if mexicans are only killing other mexicans.

36

Could "this generation" inspire a new "1975 debacle"?

by Island Man in

i think that it's possible that they're getting ready to issue a new end time date insinuation like they did with 1975. now i know what some of you are probably thinking: why would they be so stupid as to repeat such a mistake, knowing what happened in 1975?

well here're two reasons why i think they could do it:.

first, it's important to remember that they are deluded.

OneEyedJoe

I actually think that in a lot of ways it's in their best interests to push a new hard date like 1975. They'll get one last good push out of any fence-sitters, and they'll likely rake in a lot of money from the die-hards. They might even get enough short-term growth out of it to sell the idea that they really do need more KHs built in the US. Then once it comes and goes the fence-sitters will leave allowing them liquidate a lot of the real-estate assets and get down to a slightly smaller, but fiercely loyal following that will generate higher profit margins. They'll have lower overhead but I suspect those that they lose are probably already not donating very much so they could actually come away with more profit in absolute terms as well.

Those that they're left with after the disappointment will likely be even more loyal to the cult than they are today - this is seen time and again in doomsday cults, when the prophecy fails those that stay double down on their dedication to the cult and often are invigorated into proselytizing. Having shed those that already had their issues with the cult and further securing the loyalty of those that remain, they'll find it easier to make the sweeping organizational changes that they need to make in order to maintain viability with less "murmuring" going on at the grassroots level.

The GB is getting old (again) and they no doubt want desperately for the end to come soon. The cult is "under attack" from the authorities for their child abuse and shunning policies too, so they probably believe the end is near if they're true believers. This time around I do think they'll be more careful and keep the date prediction to CO talks, convention talks, and maybe online-only content, so when it doesn't happen they won't have to work so hard to hide their failed prediction. If they do put anything in print, you can be sure they'll edit it after the fact in their online library.

36

What ARE the fruits that the JW tree produces?

by TTWSYF in

my brother [the elder] often refers to this line as to 'knowing a tree by it;s fruits'.

so,my question is what are the jw fruits?.

just asking....sincerely.

OneEyedJoe

Judgement

Passive aggressive manipulation

Emotional manipulation

Black and white thinking

Blind obedience

128

Participate In The EX-JW Personality Test!

by C0ntr013r in

first of all; i must admit that i'm not a huge fan of putting people in boxes like this, it is not an exact science.

but i still think the data can be quite interesting and i intend to collect it and share it in a structured way with you guys.

so without future ado here are the details.. link to test: .

OneEyedJoe

It would be interesting if anyone else tries & compared

Human metrics test:

Introvert(84%) iNtuitive(47%) Thinking(100%) Judging(56%)

16 personalities test:

100% introverted, 27% intuitive, 97% thinking, 44% judging

Not really a significant difference, but I found myself choosing the middle option a lot more on the human metrics test. But I'm not sure what that means.

128

Participate In The EX-JW Personality Test!

by C0ntr013r in

first of all; i must admit that i'm not a huge fan of putting people in boxes like this, it is not an exact science.

but i still think the data can be quite interesting and i intend to collect it and share it in a structured way with you guys.

so without future ado here are the details.. link to test: .

OneEyedJoe

Controller - your charts are really meaningless without normalizing based on the general population. You're surprised at how even the distribution has been, but that in itself is significant since, for example, INTJs are less than 1%of the population. The fact that INTJs are about as common here as other personalities either means that they're MUCH more likely to wake up, or that they're much more likely to talk about it online, or some combination thereof (I'm in the "combination of the two" camp).