Posts by OneEyedJoe

42

Evolution is a Fact #10 - Non-Coding DNA

by cofty in

every cell in your body contains a big book of how to build another you.. although it's approximately 3 billion letters long only a small fraction of it contains instructions on making humans.. imagine trying to use a workshop manual but it reads like somebody messed up at the publishers.

there are a few paragraphs of meaningful text followed by pages of gibberish, another page or so of useful instructions then 9 more of random words.

some of it looks like copies of original text but full of typing errors.

OneEyedJoe

There is.

Please, do share.

42

Evolution is a Fact #10 - Non-Coding DNA

by cofty in

every cell in your body contains a big book of how to build another you.. although it's approximately 3 billion letters long only a small fraction of it contains instructions on making humans.. imagine trying to use a workshop manual but it reads like somebody messed up at the publishers.

there are a few paragraphs of meaningful text followed by pages of gibberish, another page or so of useful instructions then 9 more of random words.

some of it looks like copies of original text but full of typing errors.

OneEyedJoe

There is no basis whatsoever to dispute that the earth is round (oval) It is an indisputable fact.

There is no basis whatsoever to dispute that all species on earth evolved from a common ancestor. It is an indisputable fact.

How am i doing?

In case you're having trouble with it, my point is that there is a preponderance of evidence that evolution is factually accurate. If you want to come in and declare it not to be a fact, then you'll need to present some sort of evidence to support your claim. Otherwise your claim can be dismissed as easily (and appropriately) as you dismissed my claim that the earth is flat.

Edit: Arg! Cofty beat me by a millisecond!

42

Evolution is a Fact #10 - Non-Coding DNA

by cofty in

every cell in your body contains a big book of how to build another you.. although it's approximately 3 billion letters long only a small fraction of it contains instructions on making humans.. imagine trying to use a workshop manual but it reads like somebody messed up at the publishers.

there are a few paragraphs of meaningful text followed by pages of gibberish, another page or so of useful instructions then 9 more of random words.

some of it looks like copies of original text but full of typing errors.

OneEyedJoe

Facts cannot be disputed. Since there is basis to dispute evolution, it is not a fact.

Facts cannot be disputed. Since there is basis to dispute that the earth is round, it is not a fact.

I can do it too!

13

2015 WT CD ROM Trying to Hide the Past

by The Searcher in

when installing, it asks if you'd like to receive automatic updates via the internet.. in other words, "we will re-write our history without you knowing what was written previously.".

the corporation knows that many will never exchange their cd rom for the puerile online library, so doctoring their previous "truths" is the best solution.. a bit like the creed painted on the barn door in "animal farm.

" .

OneEyedJoe

Steve2 - I agree that there's nothing intrinsically wrong with it, but the way the WT does it is deceptive. If you read online news articles you'll often see a list at the bottom of what they changed since first posting the story. I've read articles 10 minutes after they were posted and they had already gotten a correction or two made and listed at the end - it would be easy in cases like that to fix it and hope no one saw it, but they don't because they have some journalistic integrity. The watchtower, on the other hand, prints hard copies of their magazines and leaves the version up for months only to change it later without acknowledgement of any kind. Look at the January 2015 awake that they changed - you'll find absolutely no acknowledgement anywhere of the change.

17

The Governing Body does just what they say Apostates do

by Watchtower-Free in

.

OneEyedJoe

I'm interested to know the back story of the photo.

13

2015 WT CD ROM Trying to Hide the Past

by The Searcher in

when installing, it asks if you'd like to receive automatic updates via the internet.. in other words, "we will re-write our history without you knowing what was written previously.".

the corporation knows that many will never exchange their cd rom for the puerile online library, so doctoring their previous "truths" is the best solution.. a bit like the creed painted on the barn door in "animal farm.

" .

OneEyedJoe

Or it could be just a way of updating the software that runs the library - but you carry on being overy suspicious and paranoid

Is it really overly suspicious when they have a well verified history of changing their past literature when what they previously printed becomes inconvenient? They changed many statements that referenced 1975 to remove the year for a more general phrase. They changed references to the preaching work being completed in the 19th century, to be more general after the year 2000 came and went. They've more recently removed a misquote from a biologist when it became too embarrassing (don't tell me they did this out of altruism, because if they had they would've printed a retraction in addition to removing the quote) for them.

They have a well established past of using whatever means possible to revise their history to make it more palatable. You assert that it's overly suspicious and paranoid to expect this of them, I assert that it would be incredibly naive not to.

46

Evolution a Fact - Agreed but So What?

by LAWHFol in

in many debates between believers and non believers (nb), the nb uses evolution as some sort of proof to support the non existence of god.. i agree that evolution is a fact, however i feel that evolution is proof of some sort of benevolent original cause.. if i were to create an a.i.

, i would program into it the ability to self-refactor and evolve.. i would also randomly inject viruses into the program (evil) where the a.i.

would be forced to stretch its current capabilities & modify it's operating functions in order to get through the random virus, and continue living.. with a steady flow of different viruses, the a.i.

OneEyedJoe

Evolution is unavoidably in conflict with the doctrine of fundamental Christianity.

I tend to agree with what u heard from the platform at a JW meeting: if evolution is true then there was no Adam. If there was no Adam then there was no original sin. If there was no original sin then there is no need for Jesus.

The speaker thought he was making a case against evolution but was really making a case against Christianity

49

"If I wasn't born a JW, I would never have become one."

by OneEyedJoe in

i've seen it mentioned by a few on the forum that at some point there was a realization that had they not been born a jw, they never would've converted no matter how many times the jws tried to study with them.

this was my experience too, and i'm wondering how universal it is for those that were born-in but eventually left.

i think i started having this thought (more specifically that if i were not born a jw, i would surely have become an atheist by now) in my late teens.

OneEyedJoe

I've seen it mentioned by a few on the forum that at some point there was a realization that had they not been born a JW, they never would've converted no matter how many times the JWs tried to study with them. This was my experience too, and I'm wondering how universal it is for those that were born-in but eventually left.

I think I started having this thought (more specifically that if I were not born a JW, I would surely have become an atheist by now) in my late teens. For a decade I lived with this thought popping up frequently whenever I had a moment to think abstractly about things or when I pondered cosmology, evolution or morality. But all the while I continued believing (or trying to) and praying (usually as a hedge) and attending meetings and saying all the right things. In hindsight my ability to empathize with the "worldly" people at the door who might have good hearts but would want nothing to do with JWs was probably a large part of my apathy towards the ministry.

Because of this nagging thought, a sense of relief accompanied all the feelings of betrayal, loss, foolishness, and anger that washed over me in the moment I realized that, without a doubt, I had been born into a cult. I knew at that moment that while I had been lied to, manipulated and exploited by everyone I'd ever cared for that I was also finally free to be honest with myself. I was free from having to ask something of others that I knew I never would have done myself.

For those that were born-in, did you ever realize that you never would've joined if not for the circumstances of your birth? If you did, how long did you live with that knowledge before finally and fully waking up?

46

Starlight in a Young Universe

by Perry in

the scientific method begins with a faith statement called a hypothesis, and then goes on to look for evidence, for or against support of the faith statement.. secular materialists often change their ideas on exactly how things have made themselves, but never whether they did.. the manifesto for this self imposed mental ban seems to be summed up by geneticist richard lewontin:.

‘our willingness to accept scientific claims that are against common sense is the key to an understanding of the real struggle between science and the supernatural.

we take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism.. it is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated.

OneEyedJoe

Thanks Perry. I'm now stupider for having read that.

67

Is proselytizing less condescending when evolutionists do it?

by paul from cleveland in

is it just me?

OneEyedJoe

I have that answer quite unsettling.

I think this may be a fundamental difference between theists and atheists. The discomfort of not having certainty about everything is too unsettling so the possibility is rejected regardless of merit.

No amount of copy and paste about our DNA or common ancestor and whatever which change the fact in a relatively short period of time or milli-second in evolutionary terms can explain who one species went from cave paintings to putting a man on the moon.

The vast majority of the difference between those who made cave paintings and those that put men on the moon come down to incremental technological advances which in turn paved the way for societal and organizational advances, which further supported more technological advances. In short, we've had all the genetic machinery for the capability to put men on the moon for a very long time, it's just taken us a long time of writing down every generation's advancements so that the next had a little more of a head start. In short, the primary difference between the humans that were living in small tribes in caves and us today is that when we got here there were already schools and books explaining generations worth of knowledge to us.