Bible prophecies that came true are abundant. The prophecy about Babylons fall in one night, and the name of the person who would lead the charge to fell it - Cyrus. The prophecy of Cyrus has been verified as having been written long before his birth as well. You could argue that the name Cyrus was only used AFTER his taking down Babylon - but even that wouldn't change the means of Babylons defeat being prophesied and actually succeeding. To imagine that the Babylons of the time weren't aware of the prophecy is foolish, so even with knowledge of the prophecy against them they still were brought down by it.
We've covered this. The book of Daniel was written after the fact. Why would it be foolish to "imagine" that the babalonians where unaware of the prophecy?
The prophecies about Jesus were all fullfilled by his own chosen actions, true. But the sheer number of them make it improbable that he'd be able to do it, let alone the fact that free will was always a variable - what if they actually acceptd Jesus and didn't put him to death? That absolutely was a possibility because God has never and will never take away a persons freedom of choice.
I think you're underestimating how montivated someone might be to represent themselves as the son of God. He also was kinda a dick to the powers that be of the time (pharasees and romans) and considering the culture of the day, and how romans treated the folks they conqured, it's not hard to imagine that Jesus could've gotten himself killed if he was under some delusion that he was the messiah. That's all assuming that the Jesus (as represented in the bible) existed at all, which is questionable.
The flood is a questionable one I suppose, but when you factor in that every culture in humanity has a legend about a global flood it makes it far less improbable. Why would such a story span across cultures that were even separated by the oceans? Even the religions of old were built around the flood, the tradition of the easter egg comes from the Egyption story that a Goddess was preserved in an egg upon the sea, the traditions involving halloween are tied to the celebrated remembrance of the people who the flood destroyed. The fact that even the ancient pagan cultures held within them the FACT of the flood (in their minds), though from a different opinion of it being a vile evil thing, gives credence to the flood itself.
This has been covered numerous times here on the forum, and if you'd like to do some more reading, there's a great article on jwfacts about it too. The bullet points are that most ancient civilizations where situated around a body of water, because that was the easiest place to live (there's fish, you can get around on a boat, and in the case of freshwater rivers/lakes there's water for people, livestock and crops). Floods happen periodically around essentially all bodies of water, so it's not shocking that everyone has their own flood story. The details of a great many of these flood stories diverge almost immediately once you look at anything beyond the fact that it's about a flood. There's also evidence that many civilizations (the egyptians being the best known example) lived right through the time of the flood without noticing. How dare they! Then when you consider that the flood story in the bible is essentially a point-by-point retelling of the epic of gilgamesh (which, incedentally, was actually written prior to when the biblical flood was supposed to have happened) it seals the deal. The flood is bunk.
The fall of Jerusalem by Rome was foretold, and only those who listened to Christ's direction to, "Flee to the mountains" survived.
This has already been addressed in this thread.
Further, Daniel had his vision in which he saw the beasts which the angel then identified for him as certain world powers by name - this all came true, even down to the fine details of Alexander dying early and his kingdom being split in four.
Again, written after the fact.
There are numerous Bible prophecies that came true.
We're still waiting for one....
