Indeed, in many of his answers, Geoffrey Jackson has misled the RC
43 Q. So, for example, if they had become inactive or sought
44 to fade without formally disassociating, and the elders
45 came to visit and found them celebrating Christmas or
46 a birthday, they would be found to be in transgression of
47 the rules, would they not?
1 A. That is not my understanding. But again, as I said,
2 it is not my field, that goes into policy with regard to
3 those type of things, but from my personal experience,
4 that's not the case.
G. Jackson said that those policies are not of his "field". So, it seems that he is the watchman of Bethel, instead of a GB member.