Hear this song and see how the singer is worshipping :
opusdei1972
JoinedPosts by opusdei1972
-
24
Heavy metal
by Godsendconspirator ini have always loved heavy metal music (thrash metal to be more specific).
since heavy metal is usually associated with satan and occult themes many christians and jws in particular stray away from it.
in my teenagehood i was listened to it obsessively until i started studying and got baptized at age 18 and i started listening to other genres.
-
-
-
19
What's your response to Matthew 10:37 (greater love for mom and dad then Jesus)???
by jam inused to justify shunning..
-
-
opusdei1972
Then Jesus came to them and said, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me".(Matt 28:18)
If this is true, Jesus is responsible for doing nothing against the injustice of this world. If he has authority on earth, why he could not stop many crimes in his name???....On the other hand, if he has no authority, he was also a liar, because he said that it was given to him.
-
19
What's your response to Matthew 10:37 (greater love for mom and dad then Jesus)???
by jam inused to justify shunning..
-
-
opusdei1972
If Jesus were the anointed Son of God, I would die for him. However, he did not fulfill his prophecy of the second coming during his generation. He permitted forgeries in the New Testament, such as the Gospel of Matthew, whose author misquoted the Old Testament. Jesus permitted false teachings and false prophecies in his name, and did nothing to get the unity of the christian churches. Jesus permitted contradictory accounts written in the four Gospels. So, Jesus caused many division and wars between different christians. Thus, Jesus can't be the head of the congregation, because he does not say which is currently his Church. There are many churches claiming to be the true church, and all of them propagate contradictory statements.
Many people destroyed their lives waiting for a person who is totaly absent and never fulfilled what he promised.
Accordingly, why should I love a person more than my family, if he is always absent ????
-
4
The History Of Yahweh ..(The Hebrew God Of The Bible)
by opusdei1972 ininteresting video:.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gc3nxoft9no.
-
-
opusdei1972
Doug Mason Thanks for the reference.
-
4
The History Of Yahweh ..(The Hebrew God Of The Bible)
by opusdei1972 ininteresting video:.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gc3nxoft9no.
-
-
opusdei1972
Interesting video:
-
101
A question for Athiests.
by new hope and happiness ini am now an athiest myself, but i think being an athiest its a bit like having a faith.
some get very hooked on it and "preash" others (like me) simply get with with there lifes.
i am sure that some athiests like to have discussions about the non existence of " god" in a similar way that "thisists" do about the existence of god.
-
-
opusdei1972
Viviane I am even living in a country in which I have to speak neither in Spanish nor in English. I can't say which country, because JW Apologists will know who I am .
-
101
A question for Athiests.
by new hope and happiness ini am now an athiest myself, but i think being an athiest its a bit like having a faith.
some get very hooked on it and "preash" others (like me) simply get with with there lifes.
i am sure that some athiests like to have discussions about the non existence of " god" in a similar way that "thisists" do about the existence of god.
-
-
opusdei1972
Viviane when I wrote "but", I meant an implication "then" in my mind , which of course is not the same. It is not easy to think in spanish and to write in English at once.
-
101
A question for Athiests.
by new hope and happiness ini am now an athiest myself, but i think being an athiest its a bit like having a faith.
some get very hooked on it and "preash" others (like me) simply get with with there lifes.
i am sure that some athiests like to have discussions about the non existence of " god" in a similar way that "thisists" do about the existence of god.
-
-
opusdei1972
Viviane I meant that , though I did not write it formaly.
-
101
A question for Athiests.
by new hope and happiness ini am now an athiest myself, but i think being an athiest its a bit like having a faith.
some get very hooked on it and "preash" others (like me) simply get with with there lifes.
i am sure that some athiests like to have discussions about the non existence of " god" in a similar way that "thisists" do about the existence of god.
-
-
opusdei1972
That's wrong. You are trying to shoehorn a logical implication truth table mapping into your original statement and say "Hypothesis!". Even in your orginal statement there is no implication, you aren't even using the right type of logic! You keep switching between -> and => (if and then), neither of which were part of your original statement, you used "but" which isn't a logical conjunction at all, you should have used ^ (and). You've variously switched between the layman, scienctific and logical uses of the word.
Also, your example that initially gave is NOT, not even CLOSE either logically or scientifically to what you just wrote. It's absolutely clear you are learning on the fly. Your orginal statement was NOT and IF-THEN as you now write, it was "God DOES exist AND he doesn't interfere".
There was NEVER, in any sense whatsoever in your orginal statement a hypothesis. The example you NOW use CLEARLY is a hypothesis. Your original statement was never any such thing.
Did you really think no one would notice?
Ok, what I meant was this, if you prefere:
If God exists, then, he does not interfere in our life.
"God exists" is not now the hypothesis?, yes or no?
-
101
A question for Athiests.
by new hope and happiness ini am now an athiest myself, but i think being an athiest its a bit like having a faith.
some get very hooked on it and "preash" others (like me) simply get with with there lifes.
i am sure that some athiests like to have discussions about the non existence of " god" in a similar way that "thisists" do about the existence of god.
-
-
opusdei1972
Viviane you said :
"God exists" is the premise, the antecedent of the proposition.
Now read the following taken from Wikipedia:
A different meaning of the term hypothesis is used in formal logic, to denote the antecedent of a proposition; thus in the proposition "If P, then Q", P denotes the hypothesis (or antecedent); Q can be called a consequent. P is the assumption in a (possibly counterfactual) What If question.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypothesis
So, in formal logic hypothesis denotes the antecedent, yes or no?