depending on the instance (if someone is raped or robbed, you don't say "shouldn't have walked down that alley" to the person) - very poor example. Walking down any alley is within the law and is therefore anybody's right to do so, unlike racially abusing soccer players or disobeying cops' orders (both illegal).
Do you agree that during the time it takes for this great societal change to happen, responsibility and hard work must be stressed for disadvantaged black people (and disadvantaged people of any other colour) as a way for self-improvement?
So to combat that, you would try to change those surrpunding influences en masse. There are a lot of ways to do this - although living standards have risen steadily in England the only thing that did change was English football's zero racism policy, 'kick racism out of football'. Racist behaviour can lead to lifetime bans from football grounds. The surrounding influences were hardly ever mentioned, let alone changed. But the zero policy on racism has largely worked - although not 100% perfect (nothing ever is) English football grounds are just about the least racist in europe. How do you feel about this? Was the harsh zero racism policy the wrong approach?