Posts by LoveUniHateExams

15

What is wrong with Hollyweird?

by LoveUniHateExams in

so, the trailer for the new batwoman series was released a few days ago.. proof positive that hollywood, cw network and other movie/tv producers live in their own bubble and are continuing to push their sjw agenda.. the trailer itself has unbelievable levels of cringe at times.. batwoman happens to be a woman (if you hadn't already guessed) and an out and proud lesbian.

of course, there's nothing wrong with any of this, it just feels so forced.

within a few seconds of the trailer you get some girl-on girl action, just to hammer home the sexuality thing.

LoveUniHateExams

So, apparently the first episode of Batflange has been shown.

I haven't seen it but here is a review by a youtuber called JLongbone.Yeah, she's pretty hilarious. XD

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqcRTzsW0mU

13

My appreciation e-mail to Irwin Zalkin Law firm ( Child abuse )

by smiddy3 in

hi friends ,i sent an e-mail to the irwin zalkin law firm in the usa ,i`m in australia ,thanking them for going to bat for all those sexually abused in the jehovah`s witness religion.. just letting them know that what they are achieving is not going unnoticed by ex -jw`s around the world with the success they are having and hopefully will continue to do.. that was yesterday .. today i received a reply ,thanking me for my kind words ,and that they are doing the best they can.. it was nice for such a prompt reply.. i just thought i would share that with you all..

LoveUniHateExams

Hi Smiddy - well done mate.

Here's my email to the ARC that I sent a few years ago, entitled A few thoughts on the Jehovah's Witnesses (Watchtower Society):

Dear Mr Stewart

I've been watching with interest the recent testimony of Spinks and O' Brien before the Australian Royal Commission into the response of the Jehovah's Witnesses organisation (Watchtower Society) to child abuse.

Both yourself and His Honour, Justice McClellen, are doing a great job of dissecting and analysing the response (or lack of it) of the WTS to the recommendations made by the Commission in 2015.

I'm a baptised Witness who has managed a successful fade. I belong to an exJW discussion forum and faders like me are in a minority.

People who don't want to be a JW anymore often experience shunning to some degree. Although I've faded, I myself experienced being shunned by a JW 'sister' whom I knew from a time when I lived in SE England. I greeted her, she refused eye contact and blanked me, saying nothing. Granted, this was mild and I'm lucky I don't have family 'in'. But most people aren't so lucky.

Another thing: you and Justice McClellen asked "why do JWs shun people who disassociate?" ... and answer came there none. You were very close to the truth when you suggested "you shun disassociated people because the bible says so" - JWs shun disassociated people because the JW hierarchy says so. In this instance, unlike cases of disfellowshipping, there are no scriptural references, as far as I'm aware.

There have been talks at the kingdom hall where the JW speaker (usually an elder) has held up a black bible and said "if the Governing Body told me this was red, I'd say it is red!" and nobody in the audience disagreed.

The Watchtower Society has cult-like characteristics. Governments need to monitor and persuade this religion to make changes, the 'big three' being the issues of child abuse, blood, and shunning.

The Australian Royal Commission is working towards this end.

Keep up the good work!

Yours sincerely

LUHE

I also sent a similar email earlier in 2015, using my uni email and received a reply from Angus Stewart's office. I don't have that at hand but I appreciated the reply at the time.

I spelled Justice McClellan's name incorrectly but I'm sure that wasn't too bad. He does have one of those weird, Gaelic names, unfortunately. XD

But he also happens to be an excellent judge and a fine bloke, as you Aussies would say.

It definitely is nice when you receive a reply from these fine people.

39

Candace Owens interviews Douglas Murray

by LoveUniHateExams in

yeah, so the candace owens show is apparently in london and douglas murray is the person interviewed.. they cover a range of topics that are current and connected to murray's new book (the madness of crowds: gender, race and identity).. i've not got his new book but it seems to be good.

owens and murray both make good points and it's a joy to listen to them together.. enjoy .... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4o9yqrby9q.

LoveUniHateExams

Murray makes a good argument that of all the methods used, searches for online porn are probably the most reliable indicator - well, if Murray said that then I disagree with him.

How do we know that those searching for gay porn are actually gay?

They could be bisexual. And bisexual people are not gay.

39

Candace Owens interviews Douglas Murray

by LoveUniHateExams in

yeah, so the candace owens show is apparently in london and douglas murray is the person interviewed.. they cover a range of topics that are current and connected to murray's new book (the madness of crowds: gender, race and identity).. i've not got his new book but it seems to be good.

owens and murray both make good points and it's a joy to listen to them together.. enjoy .... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4o9yqrby9q.

LoveUniHateExams

I also think re the issue of marriage being destabilised ...

There was a time when minorities didn't have rights. It was entirely proper and right to correct that.

And some, maybe most, members of these minorities only wanted those rights.

But slipped into the mix was that at least some of these people were/are cultural Marxists.

It was one goal of cultural Marxists to destabilise traditional marriage.

39

Candace Owens interviews Douglas Murray

by LoveUniHateExams in

yeah, so the candace owens show is apparently in london and douglas murray is the person interviewed.. they cover a range of topics that are current and connected to murray's new book (the madness of crowds: gender, race and identity).. i've not got his new book but it seems to be good.

owens and murray both make good points and it's a joy to listen to them together.. enjoy .... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4o9yqrby9q.

LoveUniHateExams

Gay marriage destabilises the concept of marriage regardless of the intention - uh, really?

The vast majority of people are heterosexual and most marriages are between one man and one woman.

A very small minority of people are gay and not all gay people want to marry. So the percentage of people in a gay marriage is a minority of a minority.

I just can't see how this destabilises marriage.

39

Candace Owens interviews Douglas Murray

by LoveUniHateExams in

yeah, so the candace owens show is apparently in london and douglas murray is the person interviewed.. they cover a range of topics that are current and connected to murray's new book (the madness of crowds: gender, race and identity).. i've not got his new book but it seems to be good.

owens and murray both make good points and it's a joy to listen to them together.. enjoy .... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4o9yqrby9q.

LoveUniHateExams

There are gay men who in times past would have married and had a family, now choose not to do so because they feel free to live life as they would rather it - this is true, and it's good.

There are women would have stayed in unhappy marriages in times past now have greater economic freedom and choose to not to stay in such a marriage - ditto.

yet they clearly also undermine the frequency and normativity of marriage - this is correct, although such number of cases wouldn't be large.

Gay marriage clearly destabilised the whole notion of what marriage and family are - no, I don't think so.

We've taken to gay marriage relatively smoothly. It was even a Tory PM who passed it through Parliament.

I think something else has been used to attack the traditional family.

39

Candace Owens interviews Douglas Murray

by LoveUniHateExams in

yeah, so the candace owens show is apparently in london and douglas murray is the person interviewed.. they cover a range of topics that are current and connected to murray's new book (the madness of crowds: gender, race and identity).. i've not got his new book but it seems to be good.

owens and murray both make good points and it's a joy to listen to them together.. enjoy .... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4o9yqrby9q.

LoveUniHateExams

because the same economic forces that gave women the vote and decriminalised homosexuality also destabilised the family unit and called into question the boundaries of gender and sexuality - no, I don't think so.

Women got the vote and homosexuality became decriminalised. I don't see how either would destabilise the family.

39

Candace Owens interviews Douglas Murray

by LoveUniHateExams in

yeah, so the candace owens show is apparently in london and douglas murray is the person interviewed.. they cover a range of topics that are current and connected to murray's new book (the madness of crowds: gender, race and identity).. i've not got his new book but it seems to be good.

owens and murray both make good points and it's a joy to listen to them together.. enjoy .... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4o9yqrby9q.

LoveUniHateExams

Modern culture doesn't necessarily do much for women - modern culture maybe lies to women to some degree, too.

It effectively says to young women 'you can go to uni, get a PhD, become a director of the board, AND have as many babies as you want.'

Well, ladies, you can't. Only a tiny number of people (men and women) are that capable, and even they get where they get to by making sacrifices.

Y'know, some of my mates from childhood are now married with kids. When I look at their wives' FB page, it'll say something like 'full-time mummy and proud of it'. They are happy. They want to be mums to their kids, like most women do.

Of course, let ambitious people realise their ambitions, or have the best possible chance to realise their ambitions.

39

Candace Owens interviews Douglas Murray

by LoveUniHateExams in

yeah, so the candace owens show is apparently in london and douglas murray is the person interviewed.. they cover a range of topics that are current and connected to murray's new book (the madness of crowds: gender, race and identity).. i've not got his new book but it seems to be good.

owens and murray both make good points and it's a joy to listen to them together.. enjoy .... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4o9yqrby9q.

LoveUniHateExams

Ask people how to define Marxism and you get everything from far left to far right notions. It's a catch all label for ideologies as widely separated as Leninism and Nazism - no, not true. Nobody mixes up Nazism and Marxism.

There is some confusion between socialism and communism, mainly because the Oxford dictionary definition for both is virtually identical. Also, both socialists and communists take their ideas from Karl Marx.

But whether it's called socialism, communism or Marxism, it's fairly common for political gays to carry signs and banners that say 'smash capitalism', etc.

^^^ see?

39

Candace Owens interviews Douglas Murray

by LoveUniHateExams in

yeah, so the candace owens show is apparently in london and douglas murray is the person interviewed.. they cover a range of topics that are current and connected to murray's new book (the madness of crowds: gender, race and identity).. i've not got his new book but it seems to be good.

owens and murray both make good points and it's a joy to listen to them together.. enjoy .... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4o9yqrby9q.

LoveUniHateExams

Candace Owens .... yeah, we're at Candace Owens now - by all means criticise Candace Owens or critique her comments. She's not perfect.

^^^ But this comment just isn't good enough. XD