If a couple in good standing is actually denied marriage just because the brother is not a ministerial servant, then the couple should definitely go to a Catholic church and get married there as a big F-you to the WTS! They would have every right to do so, and if they end up getting disfellowshipped as a result of it, then they should have an article about their experience printed in the local newspaper. That would only be fair. How dare the corrupt WTS try to enforce their kooky little rules on people even more than before!
Posts by SAHS
-
14Will Elders Still Perform Marriages If The Sister Doesn't Marry At Least A Ministerial Servant?
by minimus inbased upon the last big meeting this past weekend, would it be proper for an elder to perform a wedding ceremony if the brother is not at least a mini servant?.
.
.
-
-
-
45
My Breaking Point -- 11/9/14
by game1914over ini have enjoyed reading your comments during the past four years.
deep down inside, i have always been agnostic.
the first few chapters in genesis are contradictory and differing.. no one has ever been able to answer my question: "why was satan ever created?".
-
-
SAHS
To “AnnOMaly”: Thank you for your clarification. You’re absolutely right. It was Raymond Franz who was the one commissioned by the GB to take a fresh look at the 607 BCE teaching as part of his compilation of the Aid to Bible Understanding book. Carl Olof Jonsson was simply researching an enquiry he came across from a householder in the field service – and he certainly did quite a fine job of it! When he decided to show his findings to the GB, they weren’t too thrilled with the results of his research – and for good reason, as it completely took out the 1914 card out from the bottom of their little house of cards. My hat is off to Ray and Carl – they were two men with balls of steel and hearts of gold.
To “game1914over”: Great pick for a user name. That name is the real truth – and a most bitter truth to swallow for the WTS!
-
22
Weekend of November 15-16 "Outrageous sock day at your local KH!"
by Separation of Powers ini am encouraging everyone here to go out a buy some outrageous socks for next week's meetings.
make a statement!
thank you to poster oppostate for the idea!!!.
-
-
SAHS
“Theredeemer”: “Tight pants and socks!!”
How about tight leather pants, with some chrome studs and chains and some Armor All car dashboard protector spray to give it all a shine. Sort of Village People style.
“cultBgone”: “I love the white socks with black pants idea . . . it's Apostasy that cannot be called apostasy.”
No, it’s not called “apostasy.” It’s called “brazen conduct” – which, incidentally, is apostasy.
-
45
My Breaking Point -- 11/9/14
by game1914over ini have enjoyed reading your comments during the past four years.
deep down inside, i have always been agnostic.
the first few chapters in genesis are contradictory and differing.. no one has ever been able to answer my question: "why was satan ever created?".
-
-
SAHS
To: “game1914over”: Welcome officially to the discussion board! From your user name it is obvious that you have seen enough to realized that the WT’s 1914 teaching is totally false. A former JW, Carl Olof Jonsson, was asked by the GB to research any historical evidence to support the WT’s 607 BC/1914 CE model. What Mr. Jonsson found was irrefutable evidence that the WT had stretched the historical chronology by exactly 20 years in order to accommodate its precious 1914 chronology. He published a detailed book called “The Gentile Times Reconsidered,” which totally and absolutely blows the 1914 thing right out of the water, and reading it only re-confirmed to me that the JWs are, in fact, false prophets acting toward their own self-serving agenda.
-
8
November 2015 article- "Boxers or Briefs? The Biblical position on girding your loins"
by Separation of Powers inthere is no room for self-expression in a cult.
this weekend's condemnation fest proved that.
looking forward to the november 2015 article, "boxers or briefs?
-
-
SAHS
Maybe to justify their stance on not wearing spandex pants, they will point to the great pyramid of Giza in Egypt and also the Soviet space satellite “Sputnik 1” and say something like this:
“Well, we can see that none of the mummies found in the tombs were shown to be wearing any spandex products. Of course not! Why? Because, according to the encyclopedia, ‘Spandex or elastane is a synthetic fiber known for its exceptional elasticity. . . . It is a polyester-polyurethane copolymer that was invented in 1958 by chemist Joseph Shivers at DuPont's Benger Laboratory in Waynesboro, Virginia.’ And, as you know, 1958 was a year which overlapped the 12-month year period beginning on October 4, 1957, on which day saw the launch of the first artificial earth satellite, called ‘Sputnik 1,’ which the Soviet Union launched into an elliptical low earth orbit – thus ushering in the age when strange sights would be seen in the heavens; i.e., the space age. So, therefore, is it not logical to conclude, brothers, that this worldly and debased spandex stuff was never intended by Jehovah, as clearly none of the mummified corpses we see in the Egyptian tombs in the pyramids have any traces of it, and also the year of its invention, 1958, overlaps the 12-month year period beginning in October 1957, the year which saw the introduction of those strage sights in the heavens? So, would spandex be something for Christians? Did Jesus ever wear spandex? Govern yourselves accordingly, brothers!”
Ya, I can just hear them saying something like that to try to justify their usual not-so-iron-clad reasoning.
-
33
I have two take aways from the zoned out meeting
by Sour Grapes inout of three hours only two things really caught my attention.
i was surprised there was no special annoucements or more new light.
the first thing is that we know that the org is having a difficult time having young males reach out to be a ministerial servents to carry microphones and adjust the height of the podium.
-
-
SAHS
“StarTrekAngel”: “Would your faith not be tested if you came to find out that your beloved God is a bad parent? I mean, c’mon, how worst can it possibly get? Jesus did not even get baptized by age 23, much less become an MS. What kind of father spends millions of years teaching his son with such poor outcome?”
Well, maybe they were just a spiritually weak family. (You know, God and Jesus.) I guess they should have the GB arrange a shepherding call for them. They have such infinite wisdom to share with them, don’t you know.
-
36
David Splane Destroys the Very Foundation of 1914- Corp. Meeting New Light
by scotoma inat the corporate meeting david splane discusses the use and misuse of types/antitypes.. the main qualifier of a type is that an account must be represented in the scriptures as a. type of some future event.. he quoted schroeder who said if an account isnt explained in the scriptures as a type than you.
shouldnt use the event as a type.. splane summed up his talk by saying if the bible is silent - we must be silent.. but they go right on celebrating the 100 years from 1914 which was determined by improperly.
going beyond anything written in the bible about nebuchadnezzars tree dream.. the bible specifically refers to the immense tree as representing nebuchadnezzar.. daniel explained it and that should be the end of the matter.. .
-
-
SAHS
“Finkelstein”: “God has provided with new light and the new light tells us that Jesus didn't take his heavenly throne in 1914 because in reality there was no calculation to be made by his living devoted servants.”
Precisely. And to back it up most conclusively, all I have to say is: “The Gentile Times Reconsidered,” by Carl Olof Jonsson. That book, which I have read, TOTALLY and THOROUGHLY blows the WTS’ spurious 1914 crap right out of the water . . . BIGTIME!
-
36
David Splane Destroys the Very Foundation of 1914- Corp. Meeting New Light
by scotoma inat the corporate meeting david splane discusses the use and misuse of types/antitypes.. the main qualifier of a type is that an account must be represented in the scriptures as a. type of some future event.. he quoted schroeder who said if an account isnt explained in the scriptures as a type than you.
shouldnt use the event as a type.. splane summed up his talk by saying if the bible is silent - we must be silent.. but they go right on celebrating the 100 years from 1914 which was determined by improperly.
going beyond anything written in the bible about nebuchadnezzars tree dream.. the bible specifically refers to the immense tree as representing nebuchadnezzar.. daniel explained it and that should be the end of the matter.. .
-
-
SAHS
“Vidiot”: “From what I've seen, hardcore True Believers would rather go down with the ship then jump ship, because jumping ship is tantamount to acknowledging that the ship is going down in the first place, and I'm sorry, but I simply can't imagine the WTS ever admitting that to such a degree (even if just by their actions).”
That certainly appears to be true, considering the more contemporary popular cults such as David Koresh’s Branch Dividians, Marshall Applewhite’s Heaven’s Gate, etc. – they do tend to try to play their game right to the bitter end (or sometimes a big fireball, literally).
“Simon”: “Eventually they end up balanced high atop a house of cards that only has one direction to go.”
I think that the WT has been trying to assemble their little house of cards in a big windstorm, because everything they try to construct (or contrive) just ends up being blown down by those two significant enemies of theirs: recorded history, and obvious logical fallacy.
“EdenOne”: “This recent view of Gog opens the door to an interpretation of an aggression from ANY type of enemy of God's people. And THAT may well be the media, the courts, etc.”
That reminds me of how “Judge” Rutherford would initiate those very provocative altercations whereby people would start preaching blatantly and defiantly against false religion and even the government right out in public, and any backlash they received was, of course, deemed “persecution.” You are right that “by forcing the hand of the authorities to persecute them,” that was just playing right into the hand of Rutherford’s contrived “win-win situation.” He might have thought that to be rather clever, but that only can be played out for so long (before people start to catch on, that is!).
Personally, I think that in terms of either the GB’s awareness or their plain stupidity of what they’re doing (or trying to do), it’s probably a bit of both: the GB knowing full well that things aren’t exactly adding up smoothly regarding the outworking of their WT prophecies; BUT, at the same time, I think that they overestimate their own capabilities and that they are, at least to some degree, self-misled – they just aren’t aware of how much they are. And, of course, in the end they are just yet another example of those who are consumed by their own defects of character – namely pride and greed. Religious charlatanry has always been thick on the ground – some make it big financially, some don’t. But to more and more folks, like me, it’s all really just a big bubbling cauldron of dirty puke!
-
32
Circuit assembly symposium: help those who have become inactive
by rosyray ini just discovered that the circuit assembly my family is attending tomorrow contains a symposium entitled:.
help others to seek jehovah's righteousness: those who have become inactive.
i poked around a bit on here and didn't find any comments about this.
-
-
SAHS
“Powermetal4ever”: “I must have been daydreaming through the whole assembly.”
I did better than that. I was napping as much as I could all through the whole assembly.
“BluesBrother”: “The reason that they do not pursue the inactive so much is that it does not go onto their report as hours in " the ministry" . Think, if they speak with you once you might ask them back and want to study . Think how much that would take off of their precious Report Hours? - Cannot have that !”
Which makes me ask regarding the elders, What good are they!
-
13
JW Net documentary
by snare&racket ini would like to make a documentary with help from the same technology that got me free of watchtower, namely the internet.
also via the same people that helped me leave, namely...you lot!.
i want to make the documentary that jw's find when they google jw.org.
-
-
SAHS
Actually, I would be quite interested in participating in this. I think that it could have quite a significant impact considering that it’s freely available on YouTube. It could be an ongoing open series in perpetuity. As many of us are already aware, there is already an independent professional documentary called “Truth Be Told” produced by Gregorio Smith, who did an extremely good job (the official Web site is “http://www.hereliesthetruth.com”), but of course there is always room on YouTube for other productions of the free, “home-made” variety. (Gotta love those webcams!)
One tip I have for everyone, which I would also do myself, is to use free online software to disguise my voice (just do an online search with the words “free online software to disguise your voice”) and, of course, use video editing software to add my own blur to sufficiently obscure my face. (I already have iMovie on my Mac for this, which should do the job fine.)
I was never an elder, regular pioneer, or even a ministerial servant; however, I was born into a very strongly JW family in 1966 (I’m 48 years old now), and my dad is a well-known, long-time elder. Currently I’m actually living with my parents right now due to circumstances (long story), who are in their mid-70s. Let’s just say that I’ve seen a lot of verbal and even some physical violence done to my mother and myself while growing up. (Not exactly what you would expect from a “mature elder,” that’s for sure!) I’m sure you could always use a variety of “testimonials” to sort through in making your compilation.
I wish you the best of luck with your endeavors. Please be sure to keep us apprised of any developments.