ninja_matt

Joined

• started 0 topics
• posted 4 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by ninja_matt

• 
  46

  Does egyptian history conflict with bible history

  by ninja_matty69 in

  1. members
  2. adult

  it is said to contain some 255 names if we start from column 2 row 11 (pharaoh menes).

  we could ignore its omission of chaires and later cheneris mentioned by manetho as this is probably just an error on manethos part as no other lists appear to validate this entry.

  statistically speaking this means that the saqqara tablet only contains 25% of the pharaohs it should contain during these timeframes, or conversely it is 75% incorrect.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  ninja_matt

  Crazyguy

  "the evidence shows the Israelites being mostly of canaanite orgins" - don't get too hung up on this because they have indeed shared the same lands for 1000's of years so no problem

  "king David and Solomon most likey did not exsist" this doesn't mean anything - in 100 years ppl might say you didn't exist but it is a pointless statement supported by nothingness

  "the bible is full of stories taken from even older writings" - the easy answer is for me to say its the other way around my friend. Again pointless statement that you cannot substantiate and i cannot be bothered to substantiate. Why don't you try and answer my paper on egyptian history?

  You mention babel so i will conclude by mentioning Excavations in and around the ruins of ancient Babylon have revealed the sites of several ziggurats, or pyramid like, staged temple-towers including the ruind temple of Etemenanki. One fragment found states “The building of this temple offended the gods. In a night they threw down what had been built/ They scattered them abroad, and made strange their speech. The progress they impeded |Bible and Spade, 1938, S. L. Caiger, page 29|

  No need to fear persecution from bible groups with that one because it supports the bible... now why don't they teach that in schools today?
• 
  46

  Does egyptian history conflict with bible history

  by ninja_matty69 in

  1. members
  2. adult

  it is said to contain some 255 names if we start from column 2 row 11 (pharaoh menes).

  we could ignore its omission of chaires and later cheneris mentioned by manetho as this is probably just an error on manethos part as no other lists appear to validate this entry.

  statistically speaking this means that the saqqara tablet only contains 25% of the pharaohs it should contain during these timeframes, or conversely it is 75% incorrect.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  ninja_matt

  Bart Belteshassur i can't explain why eygptologists place "dates for pharaoh Shishak's date as far back as 1828, and why Necho is given as 924BCE" because i have never heard this said. Shishak is said to be sheshonk who didn't appear on the scene in standard chronology until the 22nd dynasty which is after all the old king lists. I concentrated my studies on the old king lists so i also cannot easily advise how they position the later kings but i imagine the same method - but using later lists. If you see my initial paper it identifies all the lists i have studied and shishak doesn't appear on these - he is much later.

  As to how egyptologists generally date things my studies suggest they use multiple and varied sources. King lists (engraved or paper), monuments, inscriptions etc. In some cases they can use dating techniques, incl star constellations see my report about these and the dating for the pyramids themselves, and also if there are other references they can cross date to other known historical dates. Whats really interesting is that over the past couple of hundred years the dates have varied wildly by perhaps a 3000 swing. I propose that they do in fact need to swing this back a little bit.
• 
  46

  Does egyptian history conflict with bible history

  by ninja_matty69 in

  1. members
  2. adult

  it is said to contain some 255 names if we start from column 2 row 11 (pharaoh menes).

  we could ignore its omission of chaires and later cheneris mentioned by manetho as this is probably just an error on manethos part as no other lists appear to validate this entry.

  statistically speaking this means that the saqqara tablet only contains 25% of the pharaohs it should contain during these timeframes, or conversely it is 75% incorrect.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  ninja_matt

  Thanks bohm
• 
  46

  Does egyptian history conflict with bible history

  by ninja_matty69 in

  1. members
  2. adult

  it is said to contain some 255 names if we start from column 2 row 11 (pharaoh menes).

  we could ignore its omission of chaires and later cheneris mentioned by manetho as this is probably just an error on manethos part as no other lists appear to validate this entry.

  statistically speaking this means that the saqqara tablet only contains 25% of the pharaohs it should contain during these timeframes, or conversely it is 75% incorrect.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  ninja_matt

  Leolaia why have you never responded to these posts? As an avid reader of history you no doubt recognise the difficulties raised and it is vital you allow the truth back into your life. You can pm me anytime with your contact details and i can share other information i have researched with you if you want?