My eyes aren't that great...and I don't want to go full screen. Is Jackson keeping his eyes closed for stretches at a time?
It seems like his eyes are shut...maybe it is his glasses.
okay, i know the royal commission hasn't started yet.
but i'm confident enough that he will be telling some whoppers.
so i thought i'd be the first to get a thread started for something that will begin... very soon now!.
My eyes aren't that great...and I don't want to go full screen. Is Jackson keeping his eyes closed for stretches at a time?
It seems like his eyes are shut...maybe it is his glasses.
.
https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney.
Fuck, He played the typical patriarchal court card. The ""poisoning of the mind" by a mother.
What a bastard. I have faced that very same accusation over and over for years in court by a now dead psychopath. I have heard that term far more times than I would like to remember.
What a jerk - he actually thinks that elders are qualified to make that judgement???
Holy shit. I want to punch my screen...stop me now!
okay, i know the royal commission hasn't started yet.
but i'm confident enough that he will be telling some whoppers.
so i thought i'd be the first to get a thread started for something that will begin... very soon now!.
Huh. He says that the GB has made changes in response to sex abuse court cases they are dealing with.
I wonder if he meant when they went from "not having a clergy class" to claiming confidential privledge under the "clergy" clause.
Changes? Organizational changes that defy past doctrine.
okay, i know the royal commission hasn't started yet.
but i'm confident enough that he will be telling some whoppers.
so i thought i'd be the first to get a thread started for something that will begin... very soon now!.
Here we go!
Child baptism.
okay, i know the royal commission hasn't started yet.
but i'm confident enough that he will be telling some whoppers.
so i thought i'd be the first to get a thread started for something that will begin... very soon now!.
Whoa.
Jackson is becoming aurgumentive with Mr. Stewart.
Not a good move on Jackson's part.
.
https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney.
Thursday: My sister was raped in her late teens, date rape from what I was told,...
My sister was raped, too, by a wordly man - who happened to be buddies with the police in our small town. My mom called the cops right away.They were awful and blamed my sister and wouldn't press charges. They protected their drinking buddy.
So my sister went to the elders. They put her on probation for a year. For being in a place that allowed the rape to happen.
.
https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney.
BBonds: anyone have a time stamp on when Jackson said JW's don't spank?
Start watching about 50 minutes in - Justice McClelland starts questioning Jackson on the role of the father in disipline.
i thought at the end, stewart made brilliant use of scripture (about establishing fornication or other sexually immoral practises) how, in such a clever way stewart used scripture to point out that some one could basically stake out someone's house to see if a person stayed over night be they homosexual or heterosexual............that on the basis of a sort of stakeout, the two witness rule was ambivalent yet it prevailed.
due to sufficient suspicion.. and therefore why did this "suspicion" not prevail with child sexual abuse.
Poor pathetic Pope Jackson. He doesn't realize what he is up against.
He sits there with silver sword in hand and makes disparaging remarks to the Commission about their lack of knowledge of the Bible. What a jerk. Little does he know what kind of minds he is up against.
Stewart and McClelland have no problem with logical and rational thinking. It is those qualities that have got them to where they are. You don't become a courtroom lawyer or judge without having a razor sharp mind. Jackson is a blubbering fool - huh...the Bible is nothing compared to the knowledge these guys have have inside their head.
Jackson is so deluded. A deluded fool. Session Two could be a bloodbath.
.
https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney.
Dumplin: Orphan I just posted an article that lists them all.
Cool.
There is a lot of scholary research that has been done into the role of women in Old Testament times. I took a class when I was in University that was an exegesis of the Old Testament. Interestingly, the first 3 months were taught by a woman Jewish scholar.
I had a hard time keeping my head above the water line in that class - lots of Religous Studies majors. I remember Judge Deborah because I did my final paper for that first semester on the role of women and specifically examined Deborah.
Jackson has no clue about what he is talking about. He keeps lecturing the Commission on how to take scripture in context and he does the complete opposite when it comes to anything to do with a woman's authority.
Damn, I wish my prof from that class could set the idiot straight. She knew her stuff - and she was a woman teacher. She could sure school that boy some, I would think.
.
https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney.
Umber: She held great authority..........Damn, what's her name. I'll send it straight off if I find out.
Judge Deborah.
Judges 5, I think.