OrphanCrow

Joined

• started 195 topics
• posted 4,799 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by OrphanCrow

• 
  175

  Implications of gay marriage ruling

  by Rattigan350 in

  1. social
  2. current

  while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.

  but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.

  five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OrphanCrow

  Spectre:
  "I see. You are love illerate. Love ignorant."
  Of course! I was raised a Jehovah's Witness.

  That's no excuse.

  So was I.
• 
  175

  Implications of gay marriage ruling

  by Rattigan350 in

  1. social
  2. current

  while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.

  but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.

  five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OrphanCrow

  Rat: Wow, I totally agree with Junction Guy. A first time for everything. He is making sense because it is not about religion but in how proper law should be enacted.

  
• 
  175

  Implications of gay marriage ruling

  by Rattigan350 in

  1. social
  2. current

  while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.

  but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.

  five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OrphanCrow

  Rattigan: And a State's decision to maintain the meaning of marriage that has persisted in every culture throughout human history can hardly be called irrational...

  ...aaannnd...that is where I quit reading.

  We have different ideas about what constitutes rationality. And a different understanding of cultural history.

  Okay...carry on.....I shall observe your species...at which stage would you place your development? Oh right...somewhere back in one of those metal ages or something like that...pardon me for asking. As I said...carry on....
• 
  128

  Participate In The EX-JW Personality Test!

  by C0ntr013r in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  first of all; i must admit that i'm not a huge fan of putting people in boxes like this, it is not an exact science.

  but i still think the data can be quite interesting and i intend to collect it and share it in a structured way with you guys.

  so without future ado here are the details.. link to test: .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OrphanCrow

  Umber: It would be interesting if anyone else tries & compared.

  Okay...you talked me into it. I will share even though it goes against my personality type.

  INTJ. The System Builder. Pretty consistent percentages across traits. Pretty dead-on on most points.

  Hello to all of you who are INTJ - I saw a few of you back on this thread but I can't remember who you are...sorry! I am horrible at remembering names...faces, photos, paintings...I always remember. Names...nope. Not so good at that.
• 
  175

  Implications of gay marriage ruling

  by Rattigan350 in

  1. social
  2. current

  while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.

  but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.

  five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OrphanCrow

  SSC: Goddamn OC, you're good!

  Thank you.

  But heck, that ain't nothing. You should see me play snooker.

  :)
• 
  175

  Implications of gay marriage ruling

  by Rattigan350 in

  1. social
  2. current

  while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.

  but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.

  five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OrphanCrow

  Spectre: I don't even know how two women can make love.....unless they just sort of scissor.

  Ah. And therein lies your answer. You don't know that making love is not something that requires one penis and one vagina for it to happen.

  I see. You are love illerate. Love ignorant.

  And, I might add, you have no imagination. Which I find odd, considering you base your understanding of the world on a fantasy book.
• 
  175

  Implications of gay marriage ruling

  by Rattigan350 in

  1. social
  2. current

  while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.

  but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.

  five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OrphanCrow

  Junction: I only use the King James Bible!

  Ah. there ya go. We do have some common ground. I like the KJV too. Because it has unicorns in it. I really hate that the new bibbles took the unicorns out...

  I really miss those unicorns.

  :p
• 
  175

  Implications of gay marriage ruling

  by Rattigan350 in

  1. social
  2. current

  while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.

  but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.

  five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OrphanCrow

  Junction: They came here so "we the people" could determine our own destiny as a nation instead of having power concentrated in the hands of a few.

  Yeah, well...you can't escape history, can you?

  Those "we the people" decided quite some time ago (okay...a while back but not that long), that the destiny of the nation was to respect and uphold the rights of a minority in the face of majority opposition.

  ...it stands against everything I hold dear--freedom of speech, freedom of religion, etc etc.

  You just shot yourself in the foot with that statement. Those principles are exactly the principles that legalizing gay marriage is based upon - the right of the minority. Without that right, your freedom of speech and freedom of religion would be flushed down the toilet.

  It does NOT stand against everything you hold dear - it is because of what you hold dear that this ruling came about.

  
  
• 
  175

  Implications of gay marriage ruling

  by Rattigan350 in

  1. social
  2. current

  while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.

  but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.

  five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OrphanCrow

  Rattigan: Five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.

  That isn't what happened.

  You speak of "amendments". Those "five unelected federal officials" made their decision based upon the First Amendment which protects the rights of minorities. Surely you must remember that one...we have the WTS to thank for that.

  Look it up - a SOTUS ruling...I think it is the Barnette case. It is the case that the "policy" you speak of rests upon.

  I don't think you understand the democratic structure.
• 
  13

  Update on Royal Commission - "Child sex abuse inquiry hears 4000th testimony"

  by OrphanCrow in

  1. watchtower
  2. child-abuse

  newcastle heraldchild sex abuse inquiry hears 4000th testimonyby joanne mccarthy sept. 10, 2015, 10:30 p.mthe royal commission into institutional responses to child sexual abuse held its 4000th private hearing in a jail in august as britain followed australias lead in tackling child sexual abuse.the royal commission heard evidence on august 19 from a prisoner who had been sexually abused as a child.in britain, the head of its newly established independent inquiry into child sexual abuse praised the remarkable response to the australian commission.in a speech to australian church leaders on thursday, royal commissioner justice peter mcclellan said he was pleased the british inquiry would closely follow successful australian arrangements.more than 1500 people were waiting for a private hearing and about 40 people a week requested a private hearing, justice mcclellan said.the royal commission has received 16,361 allegations involving 3566 institutions since it was established in november 2012 following the newcastle heralds shine the light campaign for a royal commission into historic child sexual abuse.more than 7000 allegations relate to religious institutions, with 4418 against the catholic church, and more than 3600 against government institutions.allegations against other churches are: anglican, 871; uniting church, 411; presbyterian, 123; methodist, 69; salvation army, 519; jehovahs witnesses, 137; jewish, 80; baptist, 59; seventh day adventist, 56; australian christian churches, 50; lutheran, 32; brethren, 30; mormon, 18; coptic orthodox, 4; and greek orthodox, 2.justice mcclellan said the royal commission had referred 727 matters to police to investigate with a view to prosecuting alleged offenders.in the past few weeks, the royal commission had reported to the federal government on a national redress scheme for victims of abuse.it was clear that time limits presented a considerable, and sometimes an insurmountable, burden for survivors wishing to commence civil proceedings against child sex offenders and institutions, he said.the royal commission should also mark the end of the societal norm that children should be seen but not heard, he said.when the required silence of the child was accompanied by an unquestioning belief by adults in the integrity of the carer ... the power imbalance was entrenched to the inevitable detriment of many children, justice mcclellan said.we must ensure that in the future the institution does not silence the child.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OrphanCrow

  username: If the government are trying to suppress child abuse allegations made against their own MP's ,

  Username, I don't think that Australian MPs had child abuse allegations made against them. There were government institutions investigated and allegations made against employees of those institutions, but nowhere have I read that allegations against MPs were covered up.