I really, really want to read this article:
http://muse.jhu.edu/article/627989
If anyone has access and can send me a copy...much appreciated
i really, really want to read this article:.
http://muse.jhu.edu/article/627989.
if anyone has access and can send me a copy...much appreciated.
I really, really want to read this article:
http://muse.jhu.edu/article/627989
If anyone has access and can send me a copy...much appreciated
jehovahs witnesses think that just the bible is proof that god exists but they are wrong.
there is another mode for how he exists.
now we all know many scientists who are creationists now weren’t creationists until they examined the evidence for themselves.
The problem with "Intelligent Design":
https://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/intelligent-design-lacked-adequate-peer-review
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/aug/12/jehovahs-witnesses-under-pressure-over-handling-of-sexual-abuse-claims.
wasanelderonce: Obviously they don't use the records to any practical effect
I can think of a practical use for such records.
Records like that would give whoever held them a tremendous amount of power over the ones named in the records. Hell...if someone's name was on there...maybe someone who has a prominent position...that person would sure have to toe the line
Records that reveal criminal behavior are a powerful tool in the hands of power junkies
*think: criminal syndicates...how do they control the guys who play front line? They hold dirt on them...they hold power over them. The front line guys have to be loyal. Loyalty or their ass is toast
jehovahs witnesses think that just the bible is proof that god exists but they are wrong.
there is another mode for how he exists.
now we all know many scientists who are creationists now weren’t creationists until they examined the evidence for themselves.
I don't find it obvious
You do
Please share
jehovahs witnesses think that just the bible is proof that god exists but they are wrong.
there is another mode for how he exists.
now we all know many scientists who are creationists now weren’t creationists until they examined the evidence for themselves.
But 'God"...please define
jehovahs witnesses think that just the bible is proof that god exists but they are wrong.
there is another mode for how he exists.
now we all know many scientists who are creationists now weren’t creationists until they examined the evidence for themselves.
hope: God created it. Easy, huh?
What is "it"?
Please define "it"
jehovahs witnesses think that just the bible is proof that god exists but they are wrong.
there is another mode for how he exists.
now we all know many scientists who are creationists now weren’t creationists until they examined the evidence for themselves.
hope: ...And since when is defining God a tough question?
You da God expert
Go...easy question...for someone who knows the answer like you claim. So simple? Not tough?...let's hear it. Please explain
jehovahs witnesses think that just the bible is proof that god exists but they are wrong.
there is another mode for how he exists.
now we all know many scientists who are creationists now weren’t creationists until they examined the evidence for themselves.
I pray for you
*kisses
xxxxxxxxx
i'll let you decide.
https://youtu.be/cam-nzcaa_q.
Nah...I will pass
7(!) ads attached??! No thanks...click bait video. Someone wants to make money
jehovahs witnesses think that just the bible is proof that god exists but they are wrong.
there is another mode for how he exists.
now we all know many scientists who are creationists now weren’t creationists until they examined the evidence for themselves.
Hope: Why ask me to define something when it's as clear as glass?
Oops. Sorry to bother you. I did a little searching around and found an explanation
I'm good to go
clear as glass...or is that ass?
kisses
xxxxxxxx