I would like to make a comment about something that Mike and Kim said in their video. Around the 8:00 mark, they claim that the Watchtower of July 1, 1951 - which is included in this bound volume - had said it was okay for Jehovah's Witnesses to use their conscience in deciding to get blood transfusions.
This is an error of interpretation. The article does not say that. That particular answer was given in response to the question as to how JWs regard other people - not them. The Watchtower did not say JWs could use their conscience.
This is the quote in full and it comes at the very end of adamant opposition to blood of any form for JWs. It is a concern as to whether JWs oppose blood transfusions for people other than themselves:
• Then are we to conclude that Jehovah's witnesses
oppose the people's use or transfusions'?
That would be a wrong conclusion, Jehovah's
witnesses do not oppose the people's use of
transfusions, but allow each 'one the right to
decide for himself what he can conscientiously
do. The Israelites felt bound to abide by Goer's
law forbidding the eating of meat with the blood
congealed in it, but still they had no objection
whatever to those outside God's organization
doing it, and even supplied unbled carcasses
to outsiders who regularly ate such things
anyway. (Deut. 14:21) Each one decides for himself,
and bears the responsibility for his course.
Jehovah's witnesses consecrate their' lives to
GOD and feel bound by his Word, arnd with these
things in view they individually decide their
personal course and bear their personal responsibility
therefore before God. So, as Joshua once
said to the Israelites, "If it seem evil unto you
to serve Jehovah, choose you this day whom
ye will serve; ... as for me and my house.
we will serve Jehovah."-Josh. 24:15, AS.