i have been doing research on the arc as some people on here have suggested.
i find it interesting on the case file analysis some of the findings.
it looks like queensland and new south wales had the biggest problems with this.
RO: ...how the ARC staff broke down those numbers into different categories. Obviously, the ARC staff felt that the person's status was important in determining culpability of the organization in these terrible acts
Don't be stupid.
The ARC staff is presenting us with how the WTS broke down those numbers. The ARC staff are only working with what was given to them!!!
Ask yourself why the WTS broke the numbers down that way and kept them on record
beardless jesus in watchtower publications between 1930s and 1960s.
a simple detail 'deliberately' left out.
the question is why?.
You are right, David_Jay, the Cold War culture in America produced images of smooth, clean American men.
The masculine ideal in advertising images of that era was slick and smooth:
beardless jesus in watchtower publications between 1930s and 1960s.
a simple detail 'deliberately' left out.
the question is why?.
The 1958 Jesus in the Paradise book was Asian - he probably was Chinese. No chest hair on them...
https://www.facebook.com/thisisreveal/videos/1265278083563107/?utm_source=reveal+newsletters&utm_campaign=41ea55c5ef-the_weekly_reveal_01_10_17&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_c38de7c444-41ea55c5ef-229964425.
january 5, 2017. reporter trey bundy discusses his reporting on allegations of sex abuse among jehovah’s witnesses.
.
Vidiot:
cha ching - "...the WT has not paid one cent of the $4,000 a day yet."
Not even the slightest bit surprised at this point.
Hell, at the rate the tab's adding up, the amount's gonna overshoot the size of regular guilty-penalties or settlements before too long.
I am not at all surprised either.
The $4000 a day fine is so tiny as to be almost non-existent when taken in perspective. No wonder the WTS isn't paying - it is a really, really cheap way to avoid complying with the court order
$4000 a day for one year comes to $1,460,000
The 2017 Yearbook reported the average publisher number for 2016 as 8,132,358.
If each publisher gave the WTS $0.25 during the year - just once - if each publisher donated just a quarter- that would come to $2,033,089. More than enough to cover the fine for a full year on a single donation of only 25 cents with lots left over
No wonder the WTS wants the kids' ice cream money. It would only take all the little JW kids doing that once during the year to more than cover the fine that the WTS isn't paying
The fine is a joke. It is peanuts
https://www.facebook.com/thisisreveal/videos/1265278083563107/?utm_source=reveal+newsletters&utm_campaign=41ea55c5ef-the_weekly_reveal_01_10_17&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_c38de7c444-41ea55c5ef-229964425.
january 5, 2017. reporter trey bundy discusses his reporting on allegations of sex abuse among jehovah’s witnesses.
.
Thank you Barbara.
This is so excellent
i cannot think of a single doctrine that is so clearly laid out in the bible that every christian sect teaches the same point.
are there any doctrine where there is total consensus amongst all christian religions, including jehovah's witnesses?.
jwfacts: I cannot think of a single doctrine that is so clearly laid out in the Bible that every Christian sect teaches the same point. Are there any doctrine where there is total consensus amongst all Christian religions, including Jehovah's Witnesses?
I can.
This one is so easy.
God is male.
That is the one unchanging doctrine that is consistent in ALL Christian religions. Try changing that one and the whole f***ing mess comes crashing down
i have the goal of digitizing all wt statistical data, as much as possible, as far back as possible.user 88jm.
i recently did 1980 and i had a friend help me with 1979 and 1978.. do we have any volunteers to help me with previous years??.
it's a lot of work, but if you know excel you can make some macros that will speed up the work..
I have the list of countries as listed in the yearbook...
Haha! Yeah..."lands", according to the org
A person has to be careful when extrapolating figures from the yearbooks so that actual countries are represented. For example, for many years Newfoundland reported their own figures that were separate from the Canadian report. Likewise with Alaska, Hawaii etc
I recently did some number crunching using the old yearbook numbers and it was really frustrating to deal with the way that the org breaks down the figures into their idea of what makes up a "land" as opposed to a country
I remember Angus Stewart touching briefly on this issue during Jackson's testimony and I was puzzled about it at the time. After I worked with the yearbook figures, it occurred to me that Stewart may have been trying to highlight how the org doesn't respect secular boundaries
i think everyone here is under the impression that i am a watchtower sympathizer, i am not.
i just like facts and when people say things, which are their opinions but that facts point out as not being true, than that is when i get so motivated to make a comment.
i have read posts here, listened to six screens and read jwsurvey and seen things that people say, which are opinion, but pass them off as fact.. there are legitimate things that people on here and former jws have concerns over without manipulating what is said or trying to pass off opinion as a fact.
It was to highlight that as a society we need to focus on things that are verifiably true and things that masquerade as fact even though they are opinion or feelings.
Really? Then why was the title of this thread "Not a sympathizer"?
And besides...you have demonstrated that you only think you know what those terms mean. Or...maybe I should use your lexicon here...you only feel that you know what those terms mean
i think everyone here is under the impression that i am a watchtower sympathizer, i am not.
i just like facts and when people say things, which are their opinions but that facts point out as not being true, than that is when i get so motivated to make a comment.
i have read posts here, listened to six screens and read jwsurvey and seen things that people say, which are opinion, but pass them off as fact.. there are legitimate things that people on here and former jws have concerns over without manipulating what is said or trying to pass off opinion as a fact.
Honestly i am not going to describe my feelings on this in this forum...
Lol!
So why did you start a thread that claims you are not a sympathizer/apologist if you are not willing to back up your claim?
Seriously? You think you can just waltz on here and make a statement and expect us to accept it?
Hahaha!
I love this forum. Too much fun. :) better than comedy central sometimes
i think everyone here is under the impression that i am a watchtower sympathizer, i am not.
i just like facts and when people say things, which are their opinions but that facts point out as not being true, than that is when i get so motivated to make a comment.
i have read posts here, listened to six screens and read jwsurvey and seen things that people say, which are opinion, but pass them off as fact.. there are legitimate things that people on here and former jws have concerns over without manipulating what is said or trying to pass off opinion as a fact.
I know all that, Richard. I am aware that you have said all of that.
The exercise I proposed involves you and your feelings.
This is your thread. State your feeling/opinion on each of the points listed.
Tell us exactly why you feel you are not a sympathizer of the org.
