I would like to add to this discussion another doctor quote used by the WTS that I just tracked down.
In another thread about Russia banning the JWs, I had posted a court transcript from Russia and within that transcript, an expert's opinion on bloodless surgery was used. Mr. Stephen Pollard is a surgeon in the UK. I sent Mr. Pollard an email inquiring about his report and he gave me permission to use his quote. So, here is the email conversation.
Dear Mr Pollard,
I am doing research into bloodless medicine and I have discovered that you had the opportunity to prepare a statement for the Russian courts for the Jehovah's Witnesses in support of bloodless medicine.
Would you be able to give me some information on that?
"British surgeon Professor Stephen Pollard said in his expert opinion prepared for the Golovinsky court: "Everything is becoming more common treatment of patients are not Jehovah's Witnesses (especially doctors), to abstain from blood transfusions based solely on their knowledge of the risks associated with transfusion (consultant surgeon University Hospital St. James, Leeds, United Kingdom)."
Thank you
Mr. Pollard's reply:
I have been forwarded your e-mail. This statement must have been many years ago and I have no record or recollection of it.
I can be fairly sure that it would have been prepared at the request of a super chap called Jon Patterson, who was the JW hospital liaison officer at St James's Hospital for many years and with whom I had many dealings is the 1990s, so he might be your best starting point.
Good luck!
Steve Pollard
Me again:
Dear Mr Pollard,
Thank you so much for taking the time to respond to my inquiry.
I hope you don't mind if I ask you one more question?
Are you still of the opinion that 'bloodless' surgery is preferable to blood transfusions? And is this method actually becoming more common outside of the JW population, "especially doctors"?
Thank you
Mr. Pollard:
I am not against blood transfusion but I have always felt that if you avoid a transfusion it is better; in particular if you set out to not lose blood it keeps your surgical skills crisper, the outcomes are better (and cheaper - transfused blood is expensive and the NHS is broke). Also blood availability can be an issue at Christmas and during the summer when people are away.
I have not really seen any change over the past 20 years to be honest.
Best wishes,
Steve
It seems like the WTS has a habit of taking doctor opinion out of context. When you read the court transcript, it sounds like Mr. Pollard is advocating for abstaining from blood for all patients, including doctors. The quote gives the impression as though "even doctors" are making the choice to abstain from blood. "Abstaining from blood" translates into "NO Blood".
However, when you read Mr. Pollard's email reply, this is, and was not, his position - avoiding the over-use of blood is far, far, different than 'abstaining from blood'.