gnd...oh geez...you didn't read the brief, did you?
The brief is from a recent court case. (05/2015) It sets precedent. It is not a generalized document. Everything I have said, I have supported with documentation.
What more do you want???????
Just because nobody has successfully challenged the WTS copyright take down notices to date, doesn't mean that the notices cannot be successfully challenged. The brief I linked to proves that.
The law can continually be challenged. It is the nature of it.
Frankly, I don't think you understand the legal documents that I have linked to. Or the legal process at all.