this is unbelievable!
theocratic warfare with the courts?.
elder states that jw's do not shun: (listen to his weak definition of shunning).
Idealistic, I guess so. But I have access to people who make the changes. The people I am speaking with now have no idea this is going on and it is making a mockery of them. The Justice Department is also interested.
I can't sit back and do nothing. I won't.
this is unbelievable!
theocratic warfare with the courts?.
elder states that jw's do not shun: (listen to his weak definition of shunning).
Ya I had a good judge but he crumbled and didn't fight the religious thing.
My ex is in contempt of the whole order. The judge quit the case. We are sent to a mediator who says he has no power to enforce the order. Dead end. So I'm not a big fan of the justice system. I have since taken the course to become a CASA and got sworn in in October. This shouldn't happen.
this is unbelievable!
theocratic warfare with the courts?.
elder states that jw's do not shun: (listen to his weak definition of shunning).
In hindsight, do not mention religious issues so the JW doesn't hide behind the first amendment. Simply mention parental alienation...let them claim it's religion. Nail...coffin.
this is unbelievable!
theocratic warfare with the courts?.
elder states that jw's do not shun: (listen to his weak definition of shunning).
Ruling by the court:
Custody Case 1997-2005 USA
"Mr. M shall not directly or indirectly expose or allow the children to be exposed to shunning of their mother, or to engage in any family contacts or religious activities that directly or indirectly suggest or expose them to teachings, scriptural interpretations or declarations that Mrs. M is anything less than a good and honorable person and fully worthy of designated, implied, inferred, promised, reserved, assumed, or otherwise available, obtainable or receivable, so called spiritual blessings or rewards which might be obtained or available to faithful religious persons, including faithful members of the JW church. This shall include his exposure of the children to family members, church teachers, preachers, or other advocates of the JW church or to any condemning doctrines or activities. Mr. M shall not have, suggest or cause any religious communications with the children, advise them regarding religion or direct or advise them regarding what their personal conduct or religious activities should be, or monitor their activities to determine if they are in compliance with his religious beliefs, while they are with Mrs. M."
"The court believes this conduct negatively affecting the children's relationship with their mother should stop or be condemned. This church judgementalism, coupled with the malicious use of false accusations against their mother and her husband by their father, has nearly frightened these children away from their mother and her husband even though she is a sincere caring mother. Recognizing the children's concerns and fears, the Court ordered that Mr. M be granted custody of the children, at least for the past year. This was granted notwithstanding the terrible wrongs he has perpetrated against his ex-wife and her husband. (Defendant) is treated as spiritually dead by the JW church and the extended family who are members. This ridiculous concept of people judging others appears to be a strong part of the religious judgementalistic doctrine and is apparently required of the members of the church."
this is unbelievable!
theocratic warfare with the courts?.
elder states that jw's do not shun: (listen to his weak definition of shunning).
And yes, I'd like to mail him a thank you card for showing theocratic war strategy in action.
this is unbelievable!
theocratic warfare with the courts?.
elder states that jw's do not shun: (listen to his weak definition of shunning).
This is a video from my custody/divorce hearing where we were arguing that giving custody to a JW would alienate the children from the non-JW parent. The judge did have a copy of the custody brochure on his desk so he saw the lies. And a former elder also testified before this that he did know of the packet.
Long story short: I won custody. My ex went to the state and claimed religious prejudice. The judge chickened out and gave him the kids. But many court cases have used this video to show alienation and spiritual warfare. They won their cases.
please find below a basic form that can be modified for your particular circumstance.
this should be filed with schools, attorneys, doctors, hospitals, etc.
as a counter to the no blood card.. .
Bump because I think new cards come out in January.
Just thinking about Ian this time of year. And sending warm thoughts to Claire.
please find below a basic form that can be modified for your particular circumstance.
this should be filed with schools, attorneys, doctors, hospitals, etc.
as a counter to the no blood card.. .
It would have to be notarized. There is a space at the bottom for that or it isn't a legally binding document. This is for use when two parents are divorced and one in a non-JW and knows there are NO BLOOD cards being carried on behalf of a minor that you have joint LEGAL custody of. The JW parent won't let you know if a medical emergency arrives so having it at schools or hospitals can speak when you're not there.
This will hold water. And the hospital or doctor will be quick to jump on your support of their decision. They have their own legal departments.
please find below a basic form that can be modified for your particular circumstance.
this should be filed with schools, attorneys, doctors, hospitals, etc.
as a counter to the no blood card.. .
If you have legal or joint legal custody of a minor, please file this! Be sure to include legal certified copies of your legal papers stating your rights. The JW guardian WILL NOT phone you in the event of a crisis! Think ahead! (just remember to change the dates on here. I had trouble starting a new thread and posting this again, sorry)
