so sad.
i love europe.
i love going there not as a tourist, but just blending in and spending time with locals in non-touristy local gems.. islam seems to be spreading their religion of peace throughout the continent.
You're talking about the wahabit and salafist sharia here... For these one, you're right...
But you know that in fact Islam doesn't exist. Islam, like Christianity, doesn't exist by itself, except in theological views.
To reproach wahabit sharia at a suffi, It's like to reproach at a roman catholic what it's written in the WT
so sad.
i love europe.
i love going there not as a tourist, but just blending in and spending time with locals in non-touristy local gems.. islam seems to be spreading their religion of peace throughout the continent.
so sad.
i love europe.
i love going there not as a tourist, but just blending in and spending time with locals in non-touristy local gems.. islam seems to be spreading their religion of peace throughout the continent.
"Islam is bad for the world" : Of course, it's a religion.
It wasn't the subject to know if Islam is great or not, but the subject was about the fact than muslim are all potentially terrorists.
"Islam is bad for the world" : I answer YES
"Islam is intrinsically terrorist" : I answer NO
so sad.
i love europe.
i love going there not as a tourist, but just blending in and spending time with locals in non-touristy local gems.. islam seems to be spreading their religion of peace throughout the continent.
so sad.
i love europe.
i love going there not as a tourist, but just blending in and spending time with locals in non-touristy local gems.. islam seems to be spreading their religion of peace throughout the continent.
All the muslims I know are upset by ISIS.
ISIS kill far more muslims than another people!
And If muslims were really sleeping terrorists, a country like mine, France, with its 10% of muslim, would be constantly on fire and blood.
And we was attacked, not by foreigners, but by insiders... not by real muslims, but by lobotomized recently converted muslims (who was drinking alcohol, smoking and dancing in night club only 8 months before the attack)
reading this and it made me think, god cannot do everything.
god is holy and he cannot.
sin.
It's the concept of Almighty God who's impossible. The same logic prove omniscience is impossible.
If god exist, he can't be Almighty and he can't be omniscient! :)
so sad.
i love europe.
i love going there not as a tourist, but just blending in and spending time with locals in non-touristy local gems.. islam seems to be spreading their religion of peace throughout the continent.
tonight i watched the latest episode of fringe.
i think the walter bishop character has become one of the most fascinating in recent tv scifi history.
did you see tonight's episode and what did you make of it?
I discovered Fringe few days ago. And right now i'm looking at the middle of the fourth season!
There is some very great ideas in that series. I always liked the stories about parallel universes..
And, my god, how I like Olivia Dunham! :)
two jehovah's witnesses congregations abolished by courts.
today, 11 february 2016, an administrative lawsuit by the prosecutor of belgorod province for finding the local religious organization of jehovah's witnesses in the city of belgorod to be extremist and liquidated was granted by decision of the belgorod provincial court.
yesterday the provincial court issued a decision on the administrative lawsuit of the provincial prosecutor for liquidation of the local religious organizations of jehovah's witnesses in the city of stary oskol.. the above quote is from one of 5 articles at link.. the fourth article, doctors in court: "jehovah's witnesses died after refusing blood transfusions", gives a synopsis of the hearing in the belgorod provincial court on feb 8.. two doctors were summoned into court as witnesses in order to learn whether religious convictions have affected the state of health of jehovist patients and whether they could be the cause of the death of patients.
"christ, not this again!
there's a serious point to be made here however.
somebody published a study in the journal of personality and social psychology showing that disagreements about what constitutes a circle depend on your political perspective.
That's not what says this article...
This article doesn't speak about circle, but about tolerancy and psycho-rigidism.
It doesn't change the definition of a circle, but only the way we tolerate the deviancies from this definition.
A circle is round (in the classic euclidian plan with the clasic norm of distance) by formal definition, not by what we see... and if someone say "it's a circle" and it doesn't fit the formal definition, he say "It looks close to a circle". But the circle is round
