Scholar: My concern for the translation of these documents is well justified and I continue to urge you to carefully evaluate the fact that chronology is based upon methodology and interpretation. Carl Jonsson the principal advocate of the Jonsson hypothesis highlights a similar concern with these materials for in his GTR, 3rd edn, pp.321-332 there is considerable confusion in the interpretation of these documents even though Jonsson claims that these documents provide regnal years for the complete Neo-Babylonian period. It is far wiser to accept the biblical period which proves a twenty year gap with the Babylonian data.
Neil --
"Considerable confusion"? Ummm, no. That's simply not so.
You either misunderstand or misrepresent the case. The issue is that sometimes people make mistakes in copying, in transcribing, or in translating texts. How are these mistakes caught? By other scholars who re-examine the texts.
Are you familiar with the verb "collate," when used with the meaning "to compare texts critically"?
When there is a question about how a particular text has been transcribed or translated, the original will be rexamined ("collated") by one or more scholars who will then confirm or correct the reading.
I have been meaning to post a message about one instance of this in the case of a text from Amel-Marduk's reign for many months now, but have been sidetracked with other matters.
If you were to do reading and research on the actual texts you would understand the nature of these occasional errors and realize that they in no way cast doubt upon the names and regnal lengths of the neo-Babylonian kings, which have been established by a plethora of documents.
Jonsson claims that these documents provide regnal years for the complete Neo-Babylonian period
Neil, these documents DO provide regnal years for the complete neo-Babylonian period. Yours is an uninformed response. You have no knowledge of the documents themselves. This has nothing to do with some "claim" by Jonsson. This is an established fact. Ask any professor in the field.
Regards,
Marjorie Alley