Aztec - Really, I am speaking of no one in particular. I have noticed a few threads that are infested with know-it-alls, the worst BB pest. Nobody stood out to me in particular..... yet.
chknjetski
JoinedPosts by chknjetski
-
35
Jesus & God is not the same
by U.2.K. Tha Greate$t ini have proof that jesus is not god , not in the sight of eyes but in words.
alright check this out!
im not gonna give out too many details only a few, some might agree & some might not agree,.
-
35
Jesus & God is not the same
by U.2.K. Tha Greate$t ini have proof that jesus is not god , not in the sight of eyes but in words.
alright check this out!
im not gonna give out too many details only a few, some might agree & some might not agree,.
-
chknjetski
ellderwho-
Me thinks some newbie posters played hookie from the book study tonight.
Hey! I think I should be offended by that. Let me ask someone...
-
35
Jesus & God is not the same
by U.2.K. Tha Greate$t ini have proof that jesus is not god , not in the sight of eyes but in words.
alright check this out!
im not gonna give out too many details only a few, some might agree & some might not agree,.
-
chknjetski
Aztec- Hi. Welcome to the site. Who're 'you people'? Just curious.
Feh. I am just generalizing about some of the posters here. Thanks for the welcome. Where does a fella find a quick tutorial about the ins and outs of the board? As you can see from my quoting abilities above, I am in serious need.
-
35
Jesus & God is not the same
by U.2.K. Tha Greate$t ini have proof that jesus is not god , not in the sight of eyes but in words.
alright check this out!
im not gonna give out too many details only a few, some might agree & some might not agree,.
-
chknjetski
What I find funny is that you people claim to know anything. The evidence is biased in all directions. If you take the scriptures and quote them against each other, then there are only three options:
1. One of you two are misinterpreting the quote.
2. The text is screwed by punctuation errors, or improper translation.
or,
3. The bible is in direct contradiction with itself making it mathematically false.
Which is more likely?
Why not just say that those quotes are notable as well as your own and that there is no definitive explanation for the mess and that there is no sure answer.
Much better than
"jesus is god. See Baal. 6:18." or
"jesus is not god. Check out Satan 2:46."or
"jesus was only a magician. See some rabbi."