I wonder if any of the authors they misquoted has ever sued them or at least crtiticised them.
Well, there was this case back in 1988 when "From Our Readers" in Awake acknowledged a letter from a ticked off Professor who said he was misquoted.
It began with this paragraph:
***
g87 4/8 p. 22 Speaking in Tongues?Is It From God? ***Dr. Vinson Synan of the Pentecostal Holiness Church stressed the dilemma sincere worshipers face concerning the role of speaking in tongues. He said: "Speaking in tongues is an embarrassment to us." Why? Dr. Synan noted that tongues today may not seem to make sense to us. "Embarrassing as it may be," he continued, "glossolalia [speaking in tongues] is the gift that God has chosen at strategic points in history to expand and renew the Church."?Italics ours.
Then Dr. Synan protested how he was portrayed, and the WTS acknowledged it and apologized:
***
g88 2/8 p. 28 From Our Readers ***I have received copies of your article where I was grossly misquoted. (April 8, 1987, "Speaking in Tongues?Is It From God?") You misconstrued my words to make it appear that I am embarrassed by speaking in tongues, when that is definitely not the case. In truth I was quoting C. S. Lewis, who said that tongues were an embarrassment. Then I proceeded to tell the mighty importance of tongues in church history, i.e. why it should not be an embarrassment to the church. . . . This misquotation actually makes it seem that I oppose tongues, which I certainly do not.
Vinson Synan, United States
We
regret that we inadvertently attributed the statement of C. S. Lewis, "Speaking in tongues is an embarrassment to us," to Vinson Synan. However, we correctly quoted Dr. Synan?s statement appearing in the publication "One in Christ": "Embarrassing as it may be, glossolalia is the gift that God has chosen at strategic points in history to expand and renew the Church." We did not quote Dr. Synan to indicate that he was opposed to speaking in tongues but to show that he acknowledged that the matter of speaking in tongues could be a dilemma for some sincere worshipers today. In that article Dr. Synan indicated a possible dilemma for some: "I agree with Larry Christenson who stated . . . ?God has sovereignly chosen to use the gift of tongues as a cataly
st for renewal . . . it may not make sense to our own reason . . . but he comes knocking where he chooses . . . ?" We hope that this clarifies Dr. Synan?s position with regard to speaking in tongues, which differs from ours.?ED.