Psychdigg, your comments were directed to Simon, but as this is a public board and this discussion is as well:
The Catholic Church fell under scrutiny because of the victims and their advocates continuing to speak up in spite of being told that they had no credibility. Over time, people listen. Numbers come out. Lawsuits are won. It's all over the news. Regardless of whether records are public or private, in many states in the US it is now law that even in confidential relationships such as therapists, doctors, or clergy, if any evidence of child molestation has occured, that information cannot be kept private, it must be divulged to public officials so that it can be examined in light of the law.
How would you qualify the evidence being brought forth by the victims and their advocates in terms of anecdotal versus statistical? Whose authority would you accept in determining the statistics? Regardless of these labels, the fact remains - CHILDREN HAVE BEEN SEXUALLY MOLESTED. This has happened in the context of religion, and many of the perpetrators have not been held accountable, and continue to operate in an environment free from restraint, so that they certainly have the capability to abuse again.
As to the issue of religions being directed by god or not, it's an irrelevant argument from my standpoint. Another red herring. The issue here is child molestation, not the divorce rate of JW's. It is also not about the rate of drug use in the US, prostitution, or even the blood transfusion issue. It is about child molestation, and a religion permitting it to occur.
Finally, as for your contention that the parents are responsibile for what has happened to their children, your attempt to blame-shift away from the WT really tells me that you are working for their defense here. That's the typical response whenever the WT gets taken to task for something - shift the blame to individuals within the organization, whether that's local elders, congregations, or in this case, the parents. How dare you insinuate that the parents are to blame. The only thing they are to blame for is trying to act faithfully within the context of the brainwashing they've undergone in the name of religion. They are told that nothing as horrible as that could happen amongst "god's chosen people." They are taught to deny any sense of scrutiny they might have towards the organization because they are "the faithful and discreet slave" that god uses to "dispense spiritual food at the proper time." If you are a WT loyalist, deep down you *know* this. Fortunately, some parents woke up to see what was happening, and left so that their children will be protected.
By your argument, the best thing that parents can do to protect their children is to leave the JW religion to make them safe from pedophiles who will continue to persist. I must say, I agree with that, but I'm not sure that's the conclusion you are hoping people reach.
Again, what's your angle? What is driving you here to make the arguments that you have? You have obviously had at the very least association with the JW's, and its more likely that you are a long-time JW yourself due to the inferences you have made ("Half of Jehovah's Witness marriages end up in divorce (from my experience of 70 witness weddings in the last 40 years that I have attended"; "I
personally would like to see a drama at assemblies about this
issue." and the like) and the loyalty you have displayed towards the WT by attempting to silence its critics. What's your motivation?
Cheers,
~arachnia
Say not, "I have found the truth," but rather, "I have found a truth."
-Kahlil Gibran