Finkelstein stated:
The theological concepts between the Free Mason organization and C Russell are obviously there, once its clearly realized what
is the meaning behind what the Free Masons and the Knights Templar represent/are. Russell described himself as a Freemason
although he may not have been deep within that organization as a designated member.
The correlation although between the two got faded away during Rutherford's take over of the WTS. and Rutherford threw Pyramidology in the trash.
When the IBSA finally broke away from Rutherford, they still stuck closely to the Free Masons and are still closely associated with
that organization to this day.
Since the tens of thousands of pages of Russell's works overwhelmingly testify that Russell was not in support of any alleged "theological concepts" of the Free Masons, I can only assume that the above is being stated out of ignorance of what Russell actuallly did teach and believe. Russell described himself and all Christians as freemasons for Christ, yes, but he was not advocating that Christians become members of the Freemasons' organization. Indeed, he advocated just the opposite.
I have no reason to call upon the spirit of human imagination so as to imagine and assume that Biblical study of the Great Pyramid as God's Witness in Egypt has something to do with supporting the Freemasons. In reality, it does not!! Such a thought has to be imagined and assumed!!!!
I know that I am not in support of the Freemasons, and I don't know of any of the Bible Students who are. Generally, if a member of Freemasons becomes associated with the Bible Students fellowships, they disown their membership in the Freemasons. I know beyond any shadow of a doubt that Russell certainly never stuck closely to the Freemasons, and I know beyond any shadow of a doubt that I certainly do not stick closely to the Freemasons. Indeed, the teachings of the Bible Students in generally are totally out of harmony with the Freemasons.