Thankfully it ended in a charge for this man (the man accused of manslaughter). He got 13 years in the new trial.
http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/Kevon-Neal-Sentenced-13-Years-Prince-Georges-Officer-Adrian-Morris-262402381.html
ILoveTTATT2
JoinedPosts by ILoveTTATT2
-
51
Jehovah's Witness juror - The actions of this juror are a complete disgrace, said Prince Georges County States Attorney Angela Alsobrooks.
by Sol Reform inhttp://www.csnwashington.com/article/juror-email-leads-mistrial.
juror email leads to mistrial.
that juror now faces a possible contempt of court charge.the trial of a man involved in a high speed crash that killed a prince george's county police officer last year ended in a mistrial.. one of the jurors told the judge via email thursday morning that judging others was a violation of her religion as a jehovah's witness, news4's prince george's county bureau chief tracee wilkins reported.. kevon darnell neal, 23, was charged with vehicular manslaughter and fleeing and eluding following the death of officer adrian morris, 23.. morris and his partner were pursuing a stolen silver acura when their cruiser ran off interstate 95 near the powder mill road exit in august 2012. morris died after being ejected from the vehicle.
-
-
ILoveTTATT2
-
29
Major fail on last convention video
by ILoveTTATT2 inas noted on reddit,.
the last convention video,.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d43eygztxl4plagiarized the sound from this album:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2udtlqwtjd4 .
-
-
ILoveTTATT2
Does that suggest that the WTS didn't purchase the rights to use the song?
I am not sure what it suggests... all I know is that Audiomachine is getting money and not the WT every time that video is played... -
29
Major fail on last convention video
by ILoveTTATT2 inas noted on reddit,.
the last convention video,.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d43eygztxl4plagiarized the sound from this album:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2udtlqwtjd4 .
-
-
ILoveTTATT2
I uploaded the last convention video onto Youtube, got a "copyright claim" from Audiomachine, which I happily obliged to.
I put my comments and criticism of the WT video before hand, but still the JW's are looking at the videos like crazy...So WT is making money for Audiomachine, and I get to make thousands of JW's read some apostate material.
Win win!! -
29
Major fail on last convention video
by ILoveTTATT2 inas noted on reddit,.
the last convention video,.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d43eygztxl4plagiarized the sound from this album:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2udtlqwtjd4 .
-
-
ILoveTTATT2
Steve, just listen to the convention video and then the song... They're identical!!
-
29
Major fail on last convention video
by ILoveTTATT2 inas noted on reddit,.
the last convention video,.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d43eygztxl4plagiarized the sound from this album:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2udtlqwtjd4 .
-
-
ILoveTTATT2
They lacked the budget for cgi, and apparently, for making original music. Jehovah's hand must be short...
-
29
Major fail on last convention video
by ILoveTTATT2 inas noted on reddit,.
the last convention video,.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d43eygztxl4plagiarized the sound from this album:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2udtlqwtjd4 .
-
-
ILoveTTATT2
*** w83 1/15 p. 8 Modern Trends in Music—Can They Sway You? ***
In view of what Paul said to the Ephesian Christians about wicked spirit forces, would it be reasonable for a modern-day Christian to have records in his personal collection that exalt demonism and spiritism? If he knows that some groups are deeply involved in occult studies and practices, would it be safe to assume that none of that influence would creep through into the lyrics, the beat or even the record-album cover?
-
29
Major fail on last convention video
by ILoveTTATT2 inas noted on reddit,.
the last convention video,.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d43eygztxl4plagiarized the sound from this album:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2udtlqwtjd4 .
-
-
ILoveTTATT2
As noted on Reddit,
The last convention video,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d43EyGZTXL4
Plagiarized the sound from this album:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UdtlQWTJD4(Listen past 36:15)
This is the Album Cover:
I know many of you are non-believers (myself included), but remember the time when you were a believer. I would have been scared of this picture and would have thought the album was Satanic or something...
MAJOR FAIL!
Plus the plagiarism, of course. They might have bought it, but who knows.At best, it's poor investigation, at worst, it's plagiarism.
-
62
Convention Videos: Someone messed up royally
by ILoveTTATT2 in.
when i first saw the video, i was like, "wait... is that her... panties showing through the dress"?and it seems like it is so.turns out that if you look at the middle right of the video, there are some letters.
it reads, "footage provided by pond5".if someone wants to purchase that video to confirm, you can purchase it here:http://depositphotos.com/63621499/stock-video-violinist-girl-walking-through-a.htmli think that this was a royal mess up because i doubt they would put footage of a sister in a skimpy, revealing dress.doesn't the gb approve this?this will probably go down as another of the "subliminal images"...if there are thongs in paradise... might not be so bad after all!.
-
-
ILoveTTATT2
Here's the thing: the video supposedly portrays paradise, where everything is "perfect" according to JW standards. There are a lot of detaila in the video that are just non-sensical or may be considered "new light"... For example, there's cheese among what the dubs are eating in paradise. I thought there wasn't going to be animal products there?
Also, wouldn't a dress that is thin enough to show the panties not be allowed in the JW paradise? Especially if those panties are thong-like (not granny panties)?
If the GB doesn't allow that for visiting Bethel, or probably for any occasion where the person is outside the home, the fact that it is on the "paradise" video is a major fail.
If they bought stock video, then they should have made sure that the stock video did not contain elements they wouldn't approve of.
I am criticizing based on their own standards.
-
62
Convention Videos: Someone messed up royally
by ILoveTTATT2 in.
when i first saw the video, i was like, "wait... is that her... panties showing through the dress"?and it seems like it is so.turns out that if you look at the middle right of the video, there are some letters.
it reads, "footage provided by pond5".if someone wants to purchase that video to confirm, you can purchase it here:http://depositphotos.com/63621499/stock-video-violinist-girl-walking-through-a.htmli think that this was a royal mess up because i doubt they would put footage of a sister in a skimpy, revealing dress.doesn't the gb approve this?this will probably go down as another of the "subliminal images"...if there are thongs in paradise... might not be so bad after all!.
-
-
ILoveTTATT2
In the video it's a lot clearer... or it could be idk.
-
62
Convention Videos: Someone messed up royally
by ILoveTTATT2 in.
when i first saw the video, i was like, "wait... is that her... panties showing through the dress"?and it seems like it is so.turns out that if you look at the middle right of the video, there are some letters.
it reads, "footage provided by pond5".if someone wants to purchase that video to confirm, you can purchase it here:http://depositphotos.com/63621499/stock-video-violinist-girl-walking-through-a.htmli think that this was a royal mess up because i doubt they would put footage of a sister in a skimpy, revealing dress.doesn't the gb approve this?this will probably go down as another of the "subliminal images"...if there are thongs in paradise... might not be so bad after all!.
-
-
ILoveTTATT2
When I first saw the video, I was like, "wait... is that her... panties showing through the dress"?
And it seems like it is so.
Turns out that if you look at the middle right of the video, there are some letters. It reads, "Footage provided by Pond5".
If someone wants to purchase that video to confirm, you can purchase it here:
http://depositphotos.com/63621499/stock-video-violinist-girl-walking-through-a.html
I think that this was a royal mess up because I doubt they would put footage of a sister in a skimpy, revealing dress.
Doesn't the GB approve this?
This will probably go down as another of the "subliminal images"...
If there are thongs in paradise... might not be so bad after all!
