Look, I keep hearing all this garbage that the war is illegal and blah blah blah goes against international law but get this:
In 1991 Iraq signed a cease-fire agreement that basically said in agreeing to all it's requirements US promised to stop blowing the crap out of retreating Iraqi units. the requirements were:
Submitting to UN weapons inspections and disarming themselves of WMD
Allowing No-Fly zones (which means not shooting at them)
maybe some other stuff i cant remember...
So, in theory, since a cease-fire aggreement is NOT an official armstinance, which is a formal end to war, but merely a cessation of hostilities as long as certain requirements are met, then in theory, when the UN inspectors were forced to leave in 1998 and since the first time a US aircraft was shot at in the no-fly zone, then the Iraqis have been in Violation of this LEGAL aggreement and therefore subject to military strikes...Basically, Clinton's impotent strike in 1998 was the first salvo and now we are in the endgame....So, because the iraqis have violated the cease fire aggreement, then we have the legal right to re-engage in hostilities...
hmmmm....am I brilliant, or have I missed something?