how could ANYONE not see the sarcasm in my statement? It was blatantly obvious... even for me.
the problem is: i've seen enough people who actually mean it. so it's really hard to decipher sarcasm in this context...
googlemagoogle
JoinedPosts by googlemagoogle
-
54
Death of innocent people
by Norm inagain we have been witnessing a hideous, horrible act of terrorism where cowards and maniacs have blown up innocent people.
it is thoroughly distressing and revolting.
being a bit cynical about it this it is in all probability a payback to britain for blairs staunch support to george bush.
-
-
googlemagoogle
-
54
Death of innocent people
by Norm inagain we have been witnessing a hideous, horrible act of terrorism where cowards and maniacs have blown up innocent people.
it is thoroughly distressing and revolting.
being a bit cynical about it this it is in all probability a payback to britain for blairs staunch support to george bush.
-
-
googlemagoogle
of course we can all be friends, we are not fighting here i hope, we are discussing...
If somebody does anything to me... I'm JUSTIFIED in killing their countrymen in retaliation.
but i'd appreciate you'd use the same measure here as you use for "your country".
if someone says "the americans are ultra-conservative oilheads telling lies", i bet some of you americans would disagree and reinforce that there are people who think different.
if some mexican steals your purse, you are NOT entitled to roam around in mexico and steal cars.
if some saudi shoots your baby, you are NOT entitled to bomb his village. but IF you do: you'll just generate hunderets of new terrorists, for YOU have killed THEIR babies. -
54
Death of innocent people
by Norm inagain we have been witnessing a hideous, horrible act of terrorism where cowards and maniacs have blown up innocent people.
it is thoroughly distressing and revolting.
being a bit cynical about it this it is in all probability a payback to britain for blairs staunch support to george bush.
-
-
googlemagoogle
one of the problems i see is that more effort is put into exterminating the results instead of fighting the cause or source.
you can kill terrorists, and their "countrymen" for whatever reason (if you're thinking like u/d, i'd call this racism), but you can't kill terrorism. not with violence. each and every violent act will just force more violence.
while there should be put a lot of effort to avoid terrorist attacks, there should be put even more effort in avoiding and removing circumstances that lead to terrorism.
thanks go to the US for effing with our world. -
15
Challenge for Atheists: Proof of creation!
by googlemagoogle inhere is the proof!
i don't think you can explain that away!
not even you, funkyderek!
-
-
googlemagoogle
like oh so many, tetrapod chose to twist exegesis of the inspired scrolls in order to justify his immoral, selfish lifestyle, eating ham instead of mushrooms.
don't fool yourself, tetrapod! i suggest, everyone reading this thread to further ignore tetrapod's untrue and false word, for they are nice to the ear, as many people like ham or even eggs, so you may be lead astray by his influence. keep reading the inspired scrolls, eat mushrooms, not ham, and wait for the information i'll soon release so you will be saved.
HE IS A BLUE OYSTER FOLLOWER! -
-
-
googlemagoogle
YAM (yet another messiah)
MansonSux
iOwNyOu
Pr34cH3rM4n
GWBlikezME -
42
Recycling: Not for True Christains
by jeanniebeanz inso, i'm sitting here sorting out my recycling since tomorrow is trash day, and i remembered something that happened years ago that gave me a chuckle.. it was a sunday botchtower study and the topic was things that we should be doing to prepare for life in the new system.
even as a child, i didn't answer from the magazine and they never knew just what i was going to say; they would usually not let me hold the mic myself just for that reason... .
i had been learning about recycling to preserve our natural resources in school (6th grade, i was 10) and had my comment ready to go:.
-
-
googlemagoogle
i also remember a talk (not too long ago.. maybe a year or so) and the elder told us from the platform that it's stupid to support organizations who protect the environment/human rights/animal rights/whatever as those organizations can't solve issues forever. jesus was known as a teacher, not a healer, you know. so you're better off supporting the WTS, not amnesty international.
about the trees and paper... i always got SO angry, when they were talking about how many tons of paper they were using every month to print literature. there even was an article one day about "trees being used for spiritual food" or so. this made me SO angry!!! you know, i asked why they don't use recycled paper. the answer i got was, because this paper is better quality... omg.
i guess that was when i stopped reading the mags and didn't feel bad about it anymore. -
14
The Atheist's Book of Bible Stories - Ch. 10 - The Hard Way to Start a Fire
by RunningMan inthis is truly one of the most ridiculous stories in the bible.
even when my kids were young, they said, "this couldn't have happened.
" as always, if you want a complete copy of the book, drop me a pm with your email address.. the hard way to start a fire.
-
-
googlemagoogle
that's what they call "firefox".
-
-
-
googlemagoogle
michael
meLIKEZfish
OMG -
-
-
googlemagoogle
91nchN41Ls
pharitell
gottawoody
illBback -
15
Challenge for Atheists: Proof of creation!
by googlemagoogle inhere is the proof!
i don't think you can explain that away!
not even you, funkyderek!
-
-
googlemagoogle
just a note about the iconography in tetrapod.sapiens post:
that image is merely a representation of Her Pinkness and should not in any way be taken as a True Likeness. As the Grand High Llama Rich Daniel has proclaimed "Dear Heretic, Only the faithful can see Her. 'Nuff said"
however, true believers are always struggling with sectarians (and i start to think tetrapod.sapien is one of those), who use icons of the IPU, but this only shows their lack of faith. the TRUE follower of our LADY IPU (peace be upon HER) does not need any icons. our Lady IPU reveals Herself on whom she liketh, and she shure as the blue oyster (of doom) does not like icons.
tetrapod also quotes from apostate material stating our Lady IPU (peace be upon Her) prefers ham to mushrooms and mushrooms are from the blue oyster (of doom). every logically thinking human knows, that unicorns (whether our Lady IPU [peace be upon Her] or the common unicorn) do NOT enjoy meat, but are vegetarians. thus we can safely say that obviously our Lady IPU (peace be upon Her) prefers mushrooms to ham.
i suspect the blue oyster (of doom) influenced tetrapod in posting such apostate material.