ok, not really, but i had to much to do on thursday to post.
so who are you picking?.
i am glad to see my 49ers back in contention, though i believe that seattle will give them a run for their money.. my superbowl picks?
OK, not really, but I had to much to do on Thursday to post. So who are you picking?
I am glad to see my 49ers back in contention, though I believe that Seattle will give them a run for their money.
My Superbowl picks? Cowboys and COlts with the Colts spoiling the Cowboys homefield Superbowl.
What say you?
we just watched it from standard dvd format on our 36" flatscreen.
it was a good flick - but i bet it is fabulous in 3d and theater quality.. jeff.
uninteresting, unoriginal, irrelevant, poor execution............ I give it a 0.6 Bill.
Given your posting history, you should know.
we just watched it from standard dvd format on our 36" flatscreen.
it was a good flick - but i bet it is fabulous in 3d and theater quality.. jeff.
The general consensus on those forums is that the CGI was great but the story wasn't.
Yes, that's the truth, but then how many multi-million dollar movies have they made? lol
we just watched it from standard dvd format on our 36" flatscreen.
it was a good flick - but i bet it is fabulous in 3d and theater quality.. jeff.
LOL, 'Nuff said!
Bimbo eruption!
we just watched it from standard dvd format on our 36" flatscreen.
it was a good flick - but i bet it is fabulous in 3d and theater quality.. jeff.
there is always someone with a bucket of cold water to cast.
That's funny, Jeff. Sorry my opinion offended you, but Avatar was a poorly written rip-off of Dances With Wolves. Simple as that. Don't take it personal that there are people who are not astounded by typical Hollywood pablum.
the title pretty much says it all.. it's true that there are many classics that simply can't be topped but it doesn't stop people from trying anyway.
and what do ya know; occasionally someone does succeed.
here i will post at least one notable example.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-o9gf_sofbm&p=301f39587863d18d&playnext=1&index=3.
we just watched it from standard dvd format on our 36" flatscreen.
it was a good flick - but i bet it is fabulous in 3d and theater quality.. jeff.
No, beksbks, you are ASSuming facts that you don't know, then again, what post from you wouldn't be an ASSumption?
we just watched it from standard dvd format on our 36" flatscreen.
it was a good flick - but i bet it is fabulous in 3d and theater quality.. jeff.
I tried to watch this movie, but found the story tedious and tired. When my wife and I finally walked out about half way through I told her that it was Dances With Wolves in CGI.
this is the first post examining the manuscript and scriptural evidence for an early dating of the four gospels.
again the author is looking for both positive and negative feedback, as well as spirited good-natured debate with those that may not agree with his opinions.
all posts will be allowed provided they are civil and use appropriate language (inapporpriate language will be removed, but the post will not)..
Except that I wasn't trying to pretend to be objective
I know. You were just being a prick.
this is the first post examining the manuscript and scriptural evidence for an early dating of the four gospels.
again the author is looking for both positive and negative feedback, as well as spirited good-natured debate with those that may not agree with his opinions.
all posts will be allowed provided they are civil and use appropriate language (inapporpriate language will be removed, but the post will not)..
the scholarly and research quality of the new WT brochures on life.
Nice use of "loaded language" ;-)
