You stole my point, kind of.
And at least you believe Jesus existed, ha!
According to reports, some of Jesus’s statements related to the end-times might have been misinterpreted. (John 21.23)
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ouye3e0fypc&t=183s&pp=yguzd2h5igkgzglzbglrzsblc2noyxrvbg9neq%3d%3d.
please take the time to watch.
i am not good with words but i have heard someone so eloquently explain how i feel about something.
You stole my point, kind of.
And at least you believe Jesus existed, ha!
According to reports, some of Jesus’s statements related to the end-times might have been misinterpreted. (John 21.23)
a black mass is a ceremony celebrated by various satanic groups.
it ... is intentionally a sacrilegious and blasphemous parody of a catholic mass.
- wikipedia.
I recognise the rhetorical terms as a throw back and I think I have an idea of the argument you’re making, but I’m not sure. Could you explain what the argument is first. Who exactly is a child murderer and why?
a black mass is a ceremony celebrated by various satanic groups.
it ... is intentionally a sacrilegious and blasphemous parody of a catholic mass.
- wikipedia.
nicolaou, 2010 called and it wants its New Atheist talking point back
uw chap.
15 p. 121 par.
9 how does jehovah direct his organization?.
At the moment they’ve got an Australian, a Canadian, and an Austrian member, and in the past they’ve had members from Greece, Germany, and the UK. I don’t know any other “lands” represented. They’ve not exactly gone out of their way to try to be representative in terms of nationalities.
They probably do genuinely think they are not conducting themselves as “masters over your faith”. Whether that’s a reasonable perception many others would dispute.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ouye3e0fypc&t=183s&pp=yguzd2h5igkgzglzbglrzsblc2noyxrvbg9neq%3d%3d.
please take the time to watch.
i am not good with words but i have heard someone so eloquently explain how i feel about something.
Did Jesus dislike eschatology? Or people that couldn’t define academic terms, for that matter?
a black mass is a ceremony celebrated by various satanic groups.
it ... is intentionally a sacrilegious and blasphemous parody of a catholic mass.
- wikipedia.
You said a black mass is “intentionally sacrilegious” and then posed the question “Do JW's perform a similar Parody”. If you didn’t mean to malign the intentions of ordinary JWs then you could have at least expressed this differently.
Your sympathies for the Watchtower are duly noted.
Noted where and for what purpose? I agree with JWs on some things and disagree on others, could you write that down too, wherever this record is being kept.
Over 20 million attend the memorial, not 10.
a black mass is a ceremony celebrated by various satanic groups.
it ... is intentionally a sacrilegious and blasphemous parody of a catholic mass.
- wikipedia.
I think that ordinary JWs overwhelmingly practice their religion sincerely and attempts to portray them otherwise are inaccurate and prejudicial. If you think they are not correct in how they conduct their memorial service then argue the point, don’t portray them as secretly worshipping Satan or other nonsense.
i just made a video every jw should see.
the aim of this video is to help jehovah's witnesses be more open to constructive critisism, especially from their own members, that are swiftly excommunicated /disfellowshipped/ removed from the congregation if they dare to point out their religion's flaws concerning doctrine and practises, even when there is scriptural evidence.
i have first hand experience of that.. https://youtu.be/71zcv7lux3g.
No, that’s totally off putting. There is no way your real presentation wouldn’t have been better than that.
philip goff, professor of philosophy at durham university, in the past few weeks has said that he has become a christian of a fairly liberal and perhaps somewhat heretical variety.
it’s been a long journey from staunch atheism in his teens, to questioning the basis of his atheism and a purely materialist conception of reality as a professor of philosophy specialising in consciousness, to now considering himself a christian.
he says it’s the result of coming to terms with the fact that atheists and theists both have good arguments and looking for a middle ground that accommodates the best arguments of both.
Yes, on the one hand the history of life is a sequence of extinctions and nature is against survival. But on another deeper level, why does reality exist in such a way that life and consciousness are even possible at all. Why should it? It’s bit like pointing out bad weather makes survival more difficult but ignoring the question why there’s a planet on which weather is even possible in the first place. It seems to me that the existence of reality does reasonably call for an explanation, and invoking a being that is outside of existence as we understand it approximates what might look like some explanation. This is why I think God is likely but I don’t know for sure.
I’m more sure about other mundane things that others have different opinions on. For example I’m 90% sure the covid virus came from a lab in Wuhan and I have been sure of that from the start. I’m 90% sure Russia didn’t blow up its own gas pipeline but it was probably the US with or without help from others. I’m 90% sure that senior officials have been knowingly covering for Biden’s dementia for years. These things seem obvious to me to the point that many people have failed a basic kind of societal level intelligence test in not seeing the obvious.
philip goff, professor of philosophy at durham university, in the past few weeks has said that he has become a christian of a fairly liberal and perhaps somewhat heretical variety.
it’s been a long journey from staunch atheism in his teens, to questioning the basis of his atheism and a purely materialist conception of reality as a professor of philosophy specialising in consciousness, to now considering himself a christian.
he says it’s the result of coming to terms with the fact that atheists and theists both have good arguments and looking for a middle ground that accommodates the best arguments of both.
Because of suffering and because it might, I suppose, be possible that everything we know exists just exists all by itself, although that seems unlikely to me. There’s always the simulation hypothesis too, although I think it doesn’t really help with the question of God either way because there still needs to be an explanation for base reality. Maybe there is a third option outside of “God” and “no-God” that is even stranger than we can imagine?
For the Bible, I’m not even sure what I mean by “inspired”. I think it’s a unique book and history points toward it being prompted or instigated by God. But there’s a chance that’s wrong too. I think 70% and 40% are relatively high confidence levels to have in such widely disputed concepts. What do you believe and how confident are you?