The video, audio, and even the script appear to be AI generated. Can it be trusted to be accurate?
It’s probably accurate in the main points but I wouldn’t trust AI on any details without double checking.
https://youtu.be/tmcl4gizjii?si=xoapw8c1nug_ffuz.
The video, audio, and even the script appear to be AI generated. Can it be trusted to be accurate?
It’s probably accurate in the main points but I wouldn’t trust AI on any details without double checking.
i have a hard time watching the org's vids and reading the publications.
however, that's not the case with others here.
hence this post.
When was the announcement on beards made?
From what I can find it was December 2023.
So the image in the January 2024 Watchtower is in a publication that is dated after the announcement, but it would have been released before the announcement, and probably produced by the artist some time before that.
But I love the idea of a bearded patriarch being resurrected to Norway for light refreshments and a Bible Study on a balcony overlooking a fjord. 🥖 🥤 🏔️
it’s been discussed before that few jw leaders, past and present, have had children.
this is in contrast with other groups, such as the mormons, whose leaders have had a lot of children.
i wonder if this has impacted jw growth.
It says Schroeder had no children, which is false.
It says Geoffrey Jackson is “believed to be married”. I think it is public information that he has been married twice and his first wife died.
Why does it say Samuel Herd “was married before full time service”? He remained married.
It is wrong when it says that the trend has been toward celibacy since Knorr. If anything the opposite. Most GB members since Knorr have been married.
It says most GB members “remained unmarried”. This is false, most GB members have been married.
I don’t think it’s correct that Rutherford had his son before joining the Bible Students.
I am pretty sure it is wrong that Morris’s sons have been disfellowshipped. Quite the opposite, the gossip has been that they remain good JWs in the face of their father’s removal.
Why does it say of Rutherford’s son: “Malcolm Cammerer, before marriage”? Does it think he changed name after marriage? Or he was born before his parents married? Or what?
It doesn’t mention that Guy Pierce had children.
Some of the other stated facts may also be false but I am not in a position to say for sure because of the gaps mentioned above.
All in all pretty poor. Do not rely on ChatGPT!
it’s been discussed before that few jw leaders, past and present, have had children.
this is in contrast with other groups, such as the mormons, whose leaders have had a lot of children.
i wonder if this has impacted jw growth.
A good chance to test ChatGPT !
I asked
Can you give me a list of Jehovah’s Witness leaders, including presidents of the Watch Tower Society, and Governing Body members, and list the number of children each had
And this was the response:
Here is a list of key leaders of Jehovah’s Witnesses, focusing on:
Presidents of the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania, the main legal entity used by Jehovah’s Witnesses.
Prominent members of the Governing Body, especially those who played notable roles historically or are currently active.
Where known, number of children is listed — but note that many Watch Tower officials, especially since the mid-20th century, have remained unmarried and childless due to their belief that full-time service is a higher calling, particularly given the belief in the imminence of Armageddon.
Name | Term | Children |
---|---|---|
Charles Taze Russell | 1881–1916 | 0 |
Joseph Franklin Rutherford | 1917–1942 | 1 (a son, Malcolm Cammerer, before marriage) |
Nathan Homer Knorr | 1942–1977 | 0 |
Frederick William Franz | 1977–1992 | 0 |
Milton George Henschel | 1992–2000 | 0 |
Don Alden Adams | 2000–2016 | Unknown (likely 0; no record of a spouse or children) |
Robert Ciranko | 2016–present | Unknown (very little public personal information) |
(Only a few have publicly known information regarding children. Most remained unmarried.)
Name | Lifespan (if applicable) | Children |
---|---|---|
Raymond Franz (left in 1980) | 1922–2010 | 0 (married, no children) |
Fred Franz | 1893–1992 | 0 |
Milton Henschel | 1920–2003 | 0 |
Albert D. Schroeder | 1911–2006 | 0 |
George D. Gangas | 1896–1994 | 0 |
Lyman A. Swingle | 1910–2001 | 0 |
William Lloyd Barry | 1916–1999 | 0 |
Samuel F. Herd | 1935– | Unknown (was married before full-time service) |
Gerrit Lösch | 1941– | 0 (married, no children) |
Stephen Lett | 1949– | 0 (married, no children) |
David Splane | 1944– | 0 (married, no children) |
Anthony Morris III (recently removed) | ~1950s– | 2 sons |
Kenneth Cook | – | Unknown |
Mark Sanderson | 1965– | 0 (never married) |
Geoffrey Jackson | 1955– | Unknown (believed to be married; children unknown) |
The trend since Knorr has been toward celibacy or childlessness among top leaders, partly due to the increasing emphasis on "not marrying in this system of things" and the nearness of the end.
Early leaders like Rutherford had children before they were involved with the Witness movement (he became active in the 1890s but fathered his son earlier).
Anthony Morris III is one of the few modern Governing Body members known to have children — both sons were reportedly disfellowshipped, which was a topic of public interest.
Would you like this list in a downloadable format (PDF or spreadsheet)?
2/2it’s been discussed before that few jw leaders, past and present, have had children.
this is in contrast with other groups, such as the mormons, whose leaders have had a lot of children.
i wonder if this has impacted jw growth.
Compare and contrast with Mormon leaders!
(Including children who died in childhood)
Joseph Smith (d. 1944) - 9 with his wife, perhaps dozens with other secret wives
Brigham Young (d. 1877) - 57 with 56 wives
John Taylor (d. 1887) - 34 with 8 wives
Wilford Woodruff (d. 1898) - 34 with 9 wives
Lorenzo Snow (d. 1901) - 42 with 9 wives
Joseph F. Smith (d. 1918) - 48 (43 biological, 5 adopted) with 6 wives
Heber Grant (d. 1945) - 12 with 3 wives
George Albert Smith (d. 1951) - 3 with 1 wife
David O. McKay (d. 1970) - 7 with 1 wife
Joseph Fielding Smith (d. 1972) - 11, had 3 wives (consecutive)
Harold B. Lee (d. 1973) - 2, had 2 wives (consecutive)
Spencer Kimball (d. 1985) - 4 with 1 wife
Ezra Benson Taft (d. 1994) - 6 with 1 wife
Howard Hunter (d. 1995) - 3, had 2 wives (consecutive)
Gordon B. Hinckley (d. 2008) - 5 with 1 wife
Thomas S. Monson (d. 2018) - 3 with 1 wife
Russell M. Nelson (incumbent) - 10, has had 2 wives
Not a single one without children.
it’s been discussed before that few jw leaders, past and present, have had children.
this is in contrast with other groups, such as the mormons, whose leaders have had a lot of children.
i wonder if this has impacted jw growth.
The notice of Guy Pierce’s death in the Watchtower in 2014 said the following:
Guy Pierce was born in Auburn, California, U.S.A., on November 6, 1934, and was baptized in 1955. He married his beloved wife, Penny, in 1977 and raised a family. His experience as a family man contributed to his fatherly manner. By 1982 he and Penny were busy in the pioneer work, and in 1986 he began 11 years of service as a circuit overseer in the United States.
It doesn’t even say how many children he had, or boys or girls. Does anyone know? I guess the fact they weren’t mentioned specifically perhaps means they didn’t get baptised or else left JWs. I vaguely remember that he had a granddaughter who was not a JW who made some online posts and said he as far as she was concerned he was a good grandfather, which caused some discussion. I may be misremembering these details.
it’s been discussed before that few jw leaders, past and present, have had children.
this is in contrast with other groups, such as the mormons, whose leaders have had a lot of children.
i wonder if this has impacted jw growth.
Yes, I agree with all that no-zombie.
Another interesting aspect is that the exceptions in themselves are telling.
Rutherford had a son but became estranged from him to the point that his son wanted nothing to do with JWs and he wouldn’t answer any questions about his father from curious people who tracked him down.
Albert Schroeder had a son but it was an accident that breached the bethel no child policy and he only retained his position in bethel because of his status and connections. (I think he was already Gilead instructor when his wife became pregnant) His son by some accounts had a rather curious upbringing being the only child in bethel. In adulthood the society paid for him to study law, making him exceptional yet again in an organisation that discourages higher education.
Did Lyman Swingle have children? I have a vague recollection that he might have done, and possibly Lloyd Barry. Or I might be confusing this because I also heard that Swingle, Barry and a few others had college education.
I have greater suspicion that Guy Pierce did have a family. I should go and read his life story to find out. The very fact that it’s so vague whether Pierce and a handful of others had children is telling because it does not feature prominently in their public biographies. This is true of life stories in the magazines in general where mention of children definitely comes after outlining their theocratic career, almost as an apologetic addendum.
Tony Morris was one of the few JW leaders ever to have children. He was atypical as a GB member in being a convert who was elevated to the position, and of course also unusual in being unceremoniously removed from the GB.
As for the newer ones, I guess the general assumption is that most are lifelong Bethelites and therefore don’t have children. It doesn’t even seem to arise as a question when people are appointed. People are interested if they are married, how long they’ve been at bethel and so on, but whether they have children seldom comes up because it’s unlikely.
it’s been discussed before that few jw leaders, past and present, have had children.
this is in contrast with other groups, such as the mormons, whose leaders have had a lot of children.
i wonder if this has impacted jw growth.
i just read this.
don’t know if anybody here has seen the video.. the intended result of this is to obviously scare ‘faders’ out of the shadows.
now, they are being threatened with loss of association with their loved ones and friends.
No club is unconditional, it’s a matter of degree. I am in some groups where you can be excluded or at least ostracised for opposing trans ideology or opposing abortion. There are other groups that exclude you for taking the opposite view on those issues. Karl Popper argued that complete toleration is self-destructive and that democracies need to be intolerant of ideologies that threaten its survival. There are no absolutes, there is no such thing as unconditional. But I do appreciate that the degree of control, censorship, and surveillance among JWs is greater than many other groups and many find it something along the range of stifling to completely intolerable. If you happen to agree with JW leadership on most things it can be worth biting your tongue over a few things you don’t agree with. If you think God is in control of the organisation overall then it can even be perceived as the loyal and right thing to do. It’s a personal choice.
as it’s nearly the new year my prediction over the next decade or so will see the sense of urgency dwindle.
then some huge huge changes.
for example by 2034 in a decades time, they will have address the 1914 issue and will come out and say we can’t be dogmatic.
Different religious groups have different ways of counting membership. JWs have one of the strictest measures of any religious group and the Mormons are at the opposite end of the spectrum claiming many more members than reality. Scholars interested in establishing some sort of fair comparison between groups have used censuses to evaluate membership totals. The result in the table below compares the number of members claimed by the group compared with the academic estimate of “adherence” on the basis of census results.
The figure of 15 million for JWs makes sense because if asked to estimate the number who consider themselves to be JWs then a figure in between publisher number and the Memorial attendance sounds about right because many inactive JWs still consider themselves JWs but not everyone who attends the Memorial. The Mormon figure of 7 million also makes sense because it’s widely known the Mormon church grossly inflates their numbers by counting everybody they’ve ever baptised even though many of them never return to the church after rushed baptisms.