@kate
just reading your subject line again - would you agree its a bit ambiguous?
Did you mean to convey:
1 - Why organic chemistry proves Gods exist. <statement>
2 - How does organic chemistry prove Gods exist? <question>
so bring it on, and lay the evidence on me, kate (but perhaps you should start a new thread).-adam.
it does not prove god exists, there is no substantial evidence god is real.
if one is a self labeled atheist, one has no desire to see gods fingerprints in organic chemistry.
@kate
just reading your subject line again - would you agree its a bit ambiguous?
Did you mean to convey:
1 - Why organic chemistry proves Gods exist. <statement>
2 - How does organic chemistry prove Gods exist? <question>
so bring it on, and lay the evidence on me, kate (but perhaps you should start a new thread).-adam.
it does not prove god exists, there is no substantial evidence god is real.
if one is a self labeled atheist, one has no desire to see gods fingerprints in organic chemistry.
A journalist who has been assigned to interview lottery winners may come to feel that some special providence has been at work on their behalf, but he should keep in mind the much larger number of lottery players whom he is not interviewing because they haven't won anything. Thus, to judge whether our lives show evidence for a benevolent designer, we have not only to ask whether life is better than would be expected in any case from what we know about natural selection, but we need also to take into account the bias introduced by the fact that it is we who are thinking about the problem.
so bring it on, and lay the evidence on me, kate (but perhaps you should start a new thread).-adam.
it does not prove god exists, there is no substantial evidence god is real.
if one is a self labeled atheist, one has no desire to see gods fingerprints in organic chemistry.
kate - when you use the word "theory" do you do so in the strict scientific sense, or the popular definition?
so bring it on, and lay the evidence on me, kate (but perhaps you should start a new thread).-adam.
it does not prove god exists, there is no substantial evidence god is real.
if one is a self labeled atheist, one has no desire to see gods fingerprints in organic chemistry.
@kate
It does not prove God exists, there is no substantial evidence God is real.
true. no arguments there. we agree.
If one is a self labeled atheist, one has no desire to see Gods fingerprints in organic chemistry.
"Objection! Conjecture, Your Honour...the witness is speculating on atheists thought process".
Some atheists (me included) would be delighted to see evidence for the existence of God - I would still wonder why he is such a jerk though.
If one is a believer as I am, we think of God all the time and see him in work, play and education.
Confirmation bias.
muslim person - if they can read english direct them to www.jwfacts.com
good luck!
say hi to dannalight here.... she made a post http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/jw/friends/46/12/welcome#4909211 but it made more sense to make a new topic for her....
I dunno - send her a PM explaining it :-)
say hi to dannalight here.... she made a post http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/jw/friends/46/12/welcome#4909211 but it made more sense to make a new topic for her....
say hi to dannalight here...
she made a post http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/jw/friends/46/12/Welcome#4909211 but it made more sense to make a new topic for her...
erm - you can start your own thread - we have room for more threads than just the first one ever....:-)
Hi tho.
so, harold camping has died at the age of 92. no more end of the world predictions from him.
he apparently went into hiding after his last predictions didn't come true..
and Ronnie Biggs Great Train Robber died - I prefer Biggs method of getting rich - more transparent...