In what way did I fail to address the issue? I asked you a very specific question about the issue.
Who said you failed to address the issue? I just asked if you had issue with what was posted. Clearly you do have issue with the idea it would seem. But why ask me? Can't you address the assertion directly?
You could've addressed the post with "what the charter says is/is not" or "I think the charter implies that criticism is/is not" etc. I find your tack rather personal in nature, which is unnecessary but seems a pattern.
Besides I don't "owe" you anything.
Do
you think that means that other people are not allowed to challenge
your beliefs? Do you think that it the intention of the Declaration?
The only people that try to change other people's beliefs are religious people, in my experience. I don't listen to 'em but it's their right to espouse their beliefs, like anyone. Equality and respect, me thinks is the idea.
If the Declaration intends that beliefs shouldn't be challenged then it would say so, wouldn't it? Does It?
Would that not make all religious preaching a breach of the Declaration too?
Does it? Because if it does, then the people who wrote this should be informed.
Don't you think you have misunderstood the Declaration?
Not at all. I merely take it at face value for what it does say, not what it doesn't.
How should it read?