Because you read that as "sport scar," Dr. Freud might wonder what YOU are into, m'dear.
Projection, for starters...
Lol
when i first met my wife and on that so important first date i was 21 years old and sadly broke, she was an 18 year old au pair.
any way i treated her to mcdonald's but she had to pay for the meal.
now over 20 years later and still together, i realize how lucky i was she didn't say on that first date " if you can't afford to pay "our" mcdonald's meal f...off" .
Because you read that as "sport scar," Dr. Freud might wonder what YOU are into, m'dear.
Projection, for starters...
Lol
it is a pain that certain individuals pride themselves on hating god, who created everything.
like it's understandable that you choose to not believe in him because of your selfishness or thinking skills but to hate him is forcing it a bit.
i'm very thankful that those such as myself have the courage to believe in the lord.
OP
Eh, whatever
just thought id let you all in on some info i found on northeasttruth.com.
that magical moment where the moon blocks out the sun!
but only just enough to perfectly cover the suns disc, whilst still allowing us to see the corona of light and other electromagnetic forces radiating from it.. this only happens because the moon diameter is exactly 1/400th the size of the suns and is positioned at exactly 1/400th of the distance between earth and the sun!so, when we see it from the surface of earth, we are in the only place this can ever be seen, at the only time it could ever happen.
yes, standing waves tha could be the result of interference of the many pulsation sources in the sun, grid, or standing waves resulting from interference with another frequency, 160 minutes from beyond. like ocean waves, that, if reflected form patterns too, and leave their more permanent mark in the sand, only faint traces of the ,3 AU wavelength and 9.6 AU wavelength might now have been found.
What pulsation sources in the sun?
As mentioned, standing waves are a specific wave interference pattern requiring a fixed point where the wave is reflected back to the source. Please identify the fixed point in the solar system that would cause this to happen.
Wave interference between different frequencies does not create standing waves, by definition. Just for fun, answer me this; what are the points called where interfering waves reinforce each other and where they reduce each other?
PS: when I worked on this I was in volontary confinemt on a tropical Island, surfing, a "full in" witness, considering the bible inerrant, and of course everything was waves , accoustics. "God said":
Are you saying God told you "everything is waves?"
PS. I tried to crack Bode by analysing where it varies, and by how much from the true values. Not the glaring ones like neptune, but Mars, Mercury, Saturn, and a common factor came up 186 000 ( I had got my papers in Waikiki), so "c" waves were involvesmay be light creates not only rainbows but curved rings in the ecliptic too.
Do you mean to say now that light is a factor that proves exceptions to the Titius-Bode rule? How does light affect the planets' orbits?
just thought id let you all in on some info i found on northeasttruth.com.
that magical moment where the moon blocks out the sun!
but only just enough to perfectly cover the suns disc, whilst still allowing us to see the corona of light and other electromagnetic forces radiating from it.. this only happens because the moon diameter is exactly 1/400th the size of the suns and is positioned at exactly 1/400th of the distance between earth and the sun!so, when we see it from the surface of earth, we are in the only place this can ever be seen, at the only time it could ever happen.
you see the similarity of the Pluto real orbit and the Bode law prediction for "Neptune neptune does not belong in a bode type, double the spacings system. The same is true of the start of the series, where doubling does not start 3rd planet out.doebling stopped with Neptune, but was always there in the form of Pluto.
According to Titius' formula stated in the article, the series begins with Mercury and doubling happens with each successive planetary orbit. No end point is specified since gravity has no "end", technically.
Between the graph and table of info provided, I see what the author sees, in that Neptune and Pluto do not fit the predictions. Not sure what you see, your horrendous prose notwithstanding.
Of course for a witness it did not help that 10 for the Earth is staring you in the face.
No clue what you mean by this. What do you mean by "witness"?
just thought id let you all in on some info i found on northeasttruth.com.
that magical moment where the moon blocks out the sun!
but only just enough to perfectly cover the suns disc, whilst still allowing us to see the corona of light and other electromagnetic forces radiating from it.. this only happens because the moon diameter is exactly 1/400th the size of the suns and is positioned at exactly 1/400th of the distance between earth and the sun!so, when we see it from the surface of earth, we are in the only place this can ever be seen, at the only time it could ever happen.
Prologos,
In your theory of the solar system, assuming the sun is the origin of "gravity waves", where is the fixed point opposed to it that sets up standing waves?
Standing waves
The modes of vibration associated with resonance in extended objects like strings and air columns have characteristic patterns called standing waves. These standing wave modes arise from the combination of reflection and interference such that the reflected waves interfere constructively with the incident waves. An important part of the condition for this constructive interference for stretched strings is the fact that the waves change phase upon reflection from a fixed end. Under these conditions, the medium appears to vibrate in segments or regions and the fact that these vibrations are made up of traveling waves is not apparent - hence the term "standing wave".http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/waves/standw.html
just thought id let you all in on some info i found on northeasttruth.com.
that magical moment where the moon blocks out the sun!
but only just enough to perfectly cover the suns disc, whilst still allowing us to see the corona of light and other electromagnetic forces radiating from it.. this only happens because the moon diameter is exactly 1/400th the size of the suns and is positioned at exactly 1/400th of the distance between earth and the sun!so, when we see it from the surface of earth, we are in the only place this can ever be seen, at the only time it could ever happen.
"iii. If the Titius-Bode laws of the solar system are more than pure numerological speculations, they may be simply interpreted as the signature of the scale and rotational invariance of the protoplanetary system."
"We conclude that, if a model of planet or satellite formation leads to such geometric law for orbit diameters, this does not constitute a diagnostic of the model's validity, but only reflects its implicit scale and rotational invariance."
Titius-Bode laws in the solar system. 1: Scale invariance explains everything
just thought id let you all in on some info i found on northeasttruth.com.
that magical moment where the moon blocks out the sun!
but only just enough to perfectly cover the suns disc, whilst still allowing us to see the corona of light and other electromagnetic forces radiating from it.. this only happens because the moon diameter is exactly 1/400th the size of the suns and is positioned at exactly 1/400th of the distance between earth and the sun!so, when we see it from the surface of earth, we are in the only place this can ever be seen, at the only time it could ever happen.
"In conclusion, linear or non-linear Titius-Bode laws can now be firmly considered as at worst, numerology, at best, an outcome of some simple symetries, but even the value of the constant K does not set any relevant constraint on cosmogonic models of solar system formation"
Titius-Bode laws in the solar system. 2: Build your own law from disk models
just thought id let you all in on some info i found on northeasttruth.com.
that magical moment where the moon blocks out the sun!
but only just enough to perfectly cover the suns disc, whilst still allowing us to see the corona of light and other electromagnetic forces radiating from it.. this only happens because the moon diameter is exactly 1/400th the size of the suns and is positioned at exactly 1/400th of the distance between earth and the sun!so, when we see it from the surface of earth, we are in the only place this can ever be seen, at the only time it could ever happen.
Prologos
Are you the "unnamed correspondent" in the following article?
Reflections: The Titius-Bode Rule, Part 2: Science or Numerology?
just thought id let you all in on some info i found on northeasttruth.com.
that magical moment where the moon blocks out the sun!
but only just enough to perfectly cover the suns disc, whilst still allowing us to see the corona of light and other electromagnetic forces radiating from it.. this only happens because the moon diameter is exactly 1/400th the size of the suns and is positioned at exactly 1/400th of the distance between earth and the sun!so, when we see it from the surface of earth, we are in the only place this can ever be seen, at the only time it could ever happen.
Prologos
Have you ever submitted your theories to a university or scientific journal for review?
just thought id let you all in on some info i found on northeasttruth.com.
that magical moment where the moon blocks out the sun!
but only just enough to perfectly cover the suns disc, whilst still allowing us to see the corona of light and other electromagnetic forces radiating from it.. this only happens because the moon diameter is exactly 1/400th the size of the suns and is positioned at exactly 1/400th of the distance between earth and the sun!so, when we see it from the surface of earth, we are in the only place this can ever be seen, at the only time it could ever happen.
That there are mathematical relationships in nature isn't monumental; it's just physics.
That you attempt to infer meaning behind "hidden patterns" (that only you see) is more the question. What would be amazing is if what you say was actually true, in which case actual scientists would correlate your theories. If that happens let us know.
Otherwise you're just a crazy old man spouting off pseudoscience about music of the spheres and deism (neither of which has any basis in science). Be the poet you wannabe; leave science to the scientists.