you see the similarity of the Pluto real orbit and the Bode law prediction for "Neptune neptune does not belong in a bode type, double the spacings system. The same is true of the start of the series, where doubling does not start 3rd planet out.doebling stopped with Neptune, but was always there in the form of Pluto.
According to Titius' formula stated in the article, the series begins with Mercury and doubling happens with each successive planetary orbit. No end point is specified since gravity has no "end", technically.
Between the graph and table of info provided, I see what the author sees, in that Neptune and Pluto do not fit the predictions. Not sure what you see, your horrendous prose notwithstanding.
Of course for a witness it did not help that 10 for the Earth is staring you in the face.
No clue what you mean by this. What do you mean by "witness"?