James_Woods, yeah i have never head that one before. And what exactly is 'the service in the ministry'???
isaacaustin
JoinedPosts by isaacaustin
-
123
New here
by Change Name ini had been studying with the jehovah's witnesses for the last couple years.
they have been interesting study sessions and have learned quite a bit about them and their beliefs.
much of what they teach is what i had learned through personal bible study.. growing up was normal.
-
-
-
123
New here
by Change Name ini had been studying with the jehovah's witnesses for the last couple years.
they have been interesting study sessions and have learned quite a bit about them and their beliefs.
much of what they teach is what i had learned through personal bible study.. growing up was normal.
-
-
isaacaustin
Agreed James_Woods...his story does not add up at all...except to being a troll.
-
123
New here
by Change Name ini had been studying with the jehovah's witnesses for the last couple years.
they have been interesting study sessions and have learned quite a bit about them and their beliefs.
much of what they teach is what i had learned through personal bible study.. growing up was normal.
-
-
isaacaustin
Nice attempt at this kind of charade "Change Name"...obviously you're just an apologist trying to give a different guise.
-
529
Analysis of anti-607 BCE Rebuttals
by Ethos ini agreed yesterday to engage in the '607' topic.
i've read numerous threads and am well aware that this topic has been addressed and dissected quite thoroughly.
therefore, if you are uninterested in participating, that's fine.
-
-
isaacaustin
pathethicos, Your whole 'argument' has been a and paste of apologist sites refuted many times over in the past...your own assertions, and simply lying about what others said. If you want answers I'd suggest you review past threads on this site about this...I doubt you are really looking for answers though.
-
529
Analysis of anti-607 BCE Rebuttals
by Ethos ini agreed yesterday to engage in the '607' topic.
i've read numerous threads and am well aware that this topic has been addressed and dissected quite thoroughly.
therefore, if you are uninterested in participating, that's fine.
-
-
isaacaustin
Sounds like Ethos method of trying to defend JW BS is not even using canned arguments...its just lying about what others said.
-
529
Analysis of anti-607 BCE Rebuttals
by Ethos ini agreed yesterday to engage in the '607' topic.
i've read numerous threads and am well aware that this topic has been addressed and dissected quite thoroughly.
therefore, if you are uninterested in participating, that's fine.
-
-
-
529
Analysis of anti-607 BCE Rebuttals
by Ethos ini agreed yesterday to engage in the '607' topic.
i've read numerous threads and am well aware that this topic has been addressed and dissected quite thoroughly.
therefore, if you are uninterested in participating, that's fine.
-
-
isaacaustin
I would love to jump into this, except Ethos has made no points worth the effort...basically he has rehashed a few points other apologists have attempted (and been badly refuted on). The only difference is Ethos 'argues' these points with much less competence.
-
529
Analysis of anti-607 BCE Rebuttals
by Ethos ini agreed yesterday to engage in the '607' topic.
i've read numerous threads and am well aware that this topic has been addressed and dissected quite thoroughly.
therefore, if you are uninterested in participating, that's fine.
-
-
isaacaustin
Outlaw,
Ethos 'scholarly' efforts have not convinved you of the 'validity' of 607BCE? LOL
I would say he is probably one step more braindead than Scholar was.
-
529
Analysis of anti-607 BCE Rebuttals
by Ethos ini agreed yesterday to engage in the '607' topic.
i've read numerous threads and am well aware that this topic has been addressed and dissected quite thoroughly.
therefore, if you are uninterested in participating, that's fine.
-
-
isaacaustin
Ethos said: “607 is selected because it the only date of destruction for Jerusalem that will not undermine the prophecied 70 year servitude and exile in Babylon to appease conjectured secular evidence.”
My reply: 586/7 works just fine regarding the prophecied 70 year servitude of the nations to Babylon. There is no 70 year exile spoken of in the accounts. The ONLY conjectured secular evidence that is not appeased by the 586/7 year as the destruction of Jerusalem is that of the Watchtower, for obvious reasons.
-
49
Christ Alone vs IsaacAustin (blood)
by isaacaustin inthe wt arbitrarily imposes a ban of 'whole blood' on its members, resulting in heartache, difficulty/delay in receiving medical care, and in many cases death.
rather than focus on the relatively new allowance of blood fractions and the utter flaws in that logic to wt policy, we will focus on blood transfusions involving 'whole blood'.. christ alone, the restrictions on blood found in the ot, or hebrew scriptures if you will, were dietary restrictions on the eating of animal blood, and nothing more.
the mosaic law forbade the eating of animal blood, as it was to be poured out on the ground.
-
-
isaacaustin
CA:
What 1Sam 14:31-35 DOES show is that even in emergency situations where we could die, we are not to eat blood. There are occasions where even when committing an act that required the death penalty by God, He showed mercy and love and did not punish people as they ought to be punished. These people should have been killed for eating the blood, but they were shown mercy.
My reply: It shows that it was done, and it was not the tragic happening the GB makes it out to be. The 1 Sam account is a clear violation of what the law was.
Of course, the WT interpretation has not scriptural backing.
You have claimed the blood laws predate the Law, and used Genesis 9. However a review of the account shows blood, in that particular account, is being used as a metaphor for life...not the physical material we know as blood.
As examination of the context of Acts 15 shows that is is referring back to the days of Israel and what a gentile living in the land at that time was expected to abide by, in referring to the guidelines of Leviticus.