IP_SEC: By your standards the KJV should be fairly corrupt!! Remember, they are your standards, not mine.
Something to remember IP_SEC ....the translation of the KJV would have been the most accurate and most reliable comparing to what we have today. Note also I never said anything about the interpretation of it yet. Three very serious points to take into consideration of the bible :
1. Translation
2. Interpretation
3. Revision
The bible I have is printed in English. It was, however originally written in Hebrews (Old Testament) and in Greek (New Testament). The Authorised King James version was translated in 1611 by a committee appointed by the King himself for that work- King James! They did a great job but they did not have many of the ancient parchment and papyrus manuscripts that we have now. So tell me who do you think is the best reliable source to interpret these manuscripts in this present time? Man alone cannot do it. We still need a higher source for guidance. Spirtual and godly guidance because anybody could just say, "this is what this means" but someone else would say, "No, it means this!" You understand what I am getting at?
Could you determine who are genuine people and who are not? You can see from their fruits (what we give, how we treat others). Mind you be aware of wolves in sheep clothing. (Do not judge a book by it's cover).
hibiscusfire