Let's have a fun discussion I've heard spoken by people who believe humans were able to live long lives like Noah as we move towards "Trans Humanism" moving the Conscious in to half-robots and millions of nano-bots to keep part of us from dying. There is a article I read describing how the age of humans will get boosted to 150-200 before the 22nd Century that's pretty creepy. How do you know it's you that's inside or is it nothing more than a copy and not the original?
The question you need to ask is why did Noah's kids age fall off a cliff after the flood? Micheal Jackson belived this part of the story and sat in a hyperbaric chamber each day because it's suppose to mess with free radicals and add life to our short span.
Next is the theory that male sperm after age forty beings to deteriorate very quickly, the odds of having children with defects goes up with both men and women after age forty according to genetics articles. Noah was 500 years old when he had his kids, that might explain why their life span dropped rapidly as opposed to having kids when he was 40 in this Pre-Flood World. Adding the "Old Sperm" theory on top of the radiation that came freely because the water canopy no longer blocked out harmful UVs that age us to, that's part of the picture why people think we age quicker.
Why did Noahs kids, kids age fall down the raven too, that's a good question because you would think their DNA was still pretty strong since their only one generation away from prime DNA of Noah. Is it really hard to imagine if human beings unlocked the aging code we could no live to be two or three hundred years old if science made some incredible break-through with nanobots that re-generated the human cells making us look good?
Nobody here will participate with the Trans-human Experiment because were not rich enough and this would be set for people like Stephen Hawkings, Walt Disney and Bill Gates and that type of cream of the crop human beings!
If you have time please read this article on how Trans humanism will answer the questions we all long to learn because this will provide those who are able to live on for ever time to answer nagging questions we desire to understand!
Transhumanism Needs to Establish a Meaning to Life
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEVlyP4_11M
"s important to bear in mind Aldous Huxley’s 1932 science fiction novel Brave New World when discussing utilitarianism, especially when it is within a transhumanist context. Brave New World describes a dystopian society in which utilitarianism has run awry. The citizens of Brave New World are subject to a life totally free from conflict. There is no pain, no suffering and no failure. People are conditioned from birth to appreciate their lot in life using a variety of transhumanist techniques, such as hypnopaedic learning, subliminal advertising, genetic engineering and copious drug use. Illness in every form has been eliminated and citizens are conditioned to accept aging and death completely without worry. There are no families as that introduces too much variability into social order. Instead children are developed ex vitro using carefully refined laboratory techniques and raised through a very strict social structure.
From a utilitarian perspective, Brave New World is describing a utopia. Indeed, this utopia is in line with modern-day abolitionist ideology which seeks to use transhumanism to totally abolish the suffering of sentient beings (hence the name ‘abolitionism’). An important point to take away from Brave New World is that this utilitarian utopia has no use for freedom. Freedom gives one the choice to make poor decisions which could potentially lower the overall utility for the individual and perhaps even society as a whole. Many proponents of utilitarianism, both in the past and present, have defended individual freedom on the grounds that the individual knows best how to increase their own happiness. But these theories are describing humans, not transhumans. As Huxley argued, transhumans can be programmed against their will, so to speak, to be happier than if they were given the freedom to make decisions for themselves. And therein lies the conflict between utilitarianism and freedom."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEVlyP4_11M
