JW Facts: >>>>What hypocrisy. JWs can not get involved with politics even when their lives are at stake such as in Malawi, but make an exception if it is to save the Organization money.
I just sent this email to Janis;
Hi Janis,
I saw your article on giving Jehovah's Witnesses a tax break, and felt it worth responding. As a group Jehovah's Witnesses are encouraged to isolate themselves from ?the world?, apart from the evangelizing work that aims at growing their organization. They do not provide hospitals, schools or charities. The 2005 Annual report for the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Australia shows they had revenue of $16,434,005 but the total listed under Shepherding (hospital information, legal support, humanitarian relief work) was only $1,391.
Jehovah's Witnesses make use of Canadian infrastructure but do not give back to the Canadian system in the way mainstream religious groups do, so it is unfair for them demand equal recognition and tax breaks on the basis of religious or charity status.
JWFacts made good points. A non-profit charitable org. that substantially works to improve things for folks in THIS life perhaps deserve tax breaks. The WT/JWs do not.
Of course, as a former JW 'associate' I am interested to know if the JWs are being encouraged by the organtization to vote in this or if it is a rumor, local directive(which is unsupported by the WTBTS) or ?? I lived through Malawi/Mexico times. I would be angry if the org. was behind this, but understand if the locals 'lost their theocratic head' in it. We know that the WT will find a way to just make up the difference on the backs of the congregation-as always. Of course there are no answers here that will make me feel positive towards the WT, only some that will further cement my negative view of them.